View Single Post
 
Old 12-25-2009, 07:11 PM
davemercer davemercer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 111
Likes: 1
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 500 Magnum Nut View Post
Alx, I agree with your statement, but remember one thing.
Your dealing with 12 people who couldn't get off jury duty. Some of these people may not be too sharp, if you get my drift. On top of this, they could be in fact prejudiced against gun owners, the color of your skin etc.

The prosecutor is trying to paint you into a corner. So, why play with the idea of a modified gun in a defense trial?
I agree.

Has it happened? Who knows and how would you know? I love it when people say show me a case where this has been a factor. These people must think juries write decisions like judges explaining they "logic". Or that recorders are in jury rooms. Fact is we really don't know why juries render a particular verdict.

When in doubt play it safe is my approach.

Now when you think you may need an extra mag or gun, but that could be used against you, I say carry it. Then I accept the logic of survive first, worry later. But when you can buy used guns or new guns without the lock for carry, why carry a gun with a lock that may lock at wrong time or disable lock and give them something to use against you.

Last edited by davemercer; 12-25-2009 at 07:16 PM.