View Single Post
 
Old 02-28-2010, 09:31 PM
BigRich315's Avatar
BigRich315 BigRich315 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Newport, KY
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default

I'm mainly speculating here since I haven't personally compared the two, but in the case of the M&P's I would think the 45 may be more more shooter friendly. My M&P40c has a pretty snappy recoil that is much different from the smooth, powerful recoil of 45's I have shot, including my 4516. The 40 gives its power very quickly where the 45 is relatively more drawn out (the 40 is loaded to much higher pressures). In either caliber, the design of the M&P line helps absorb big recoil. Either is very manageable to shoot.

The 45 is also a bit bigger than the 40, with 4" barrel compared to the 3 1/2" plus a slightly longer grip. It's still very doable for CC and I plan to add one to the rotation. I'm very impressed with my 40c and expect the same with the 45c. They are definitely worth a good, long look before you decide.
__________________
Fast is fine;accurate is final
Reply With Quote