View Single Post
 
Old 04-15-2011, 05:26 PM
Outrider Outrider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 348
Likes: 180
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Default Glock 21 design flaw vs. M&P 45s?

Note: This is an out-take from the West Virginia State troopers keeping their S&W 4566s thread.

18DAI noted that Glock 21s appear to have a design flaw that causes them to not fire with disturbing regularity.

I'm not a Glock lover or hater -- but this question seemed appropriate to start another thread.

NOTE: I am NOT looking to start a brawl. I'm just looking for a clearcut answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18DAI View Post
...I would be VERY reluctant to stake my life on a Glock 21. Too much history of that model occasionally failing to go bang. Design flaw that evidently NOBODY talks about. Regards 18DAI.
What's the design flaw?

Let's talk about this!

I don't prefer Glocks -- but would own a 21SF 4th gen -- or a 20SF 4th gen -- as well as the 29 and 30.

So what RELIABLE documentation exists on this? Links would be appreciated!

Will a titanium striker fix it?

I've seen a second gen Glock 20 that wouldn't fire because of light strikes -- but it had oil, goop and gunk around the striker and channel.

I'd like to know the story -- and we can start a new thread if needed.

In most cases, I'd prefer a 4566 or 4506 -- but I can see some cases where I'd go with a Glock -- although not lovingly.

I'm still not sold on the M&P myself -- although I WANT to believe!

Last edited by Outrider; 04-16-2011 at 12:57 PM.
Reply With Quote