View Single Post
 
Old 06-28-2011, 09:15 PM
roaddog28's Avatar
roaddog28 roaddog28 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 185
Liked 214 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coaltminer View Post
We all know the Ruger is a heavy duty piece, but their trigger pull is no comparison to the Smith 29. Face it folks, you probably won't wear either one out in a lifetime. I get a kick out of the semi-auto endurance tests that seem to be popular. "We fired 10,000 rds. of this, or 20,000 rds. of that, the gun never broke." Whoopee, who cares. Ask the average handgun owner how many rounds he/she shoots in a year, most have no idea, or, "well, I go to the range every week or two and shoot 4 boxes." This would be a helluva a lot of shooting for most people, a lot more than the majority, and that's not figuring that they probably own more than one gun, rotating something each time they go out. The average is most likely several boxes a year through each gun. I shoot a lot, but I'll never wear one out, nor will my children or grandchildren. We are too busy working, raising families, maintaining the business of life to worry about it. Professionals, well, that's a different story. In reality, 10 or 20 boxes per year in each gun is about it, more than likely, less. So, why worry? There are exceptions, but I'm not one of them, and I've been a frequent handgun shooter for more than 40 years, owning close to 100 guns in that time period, not counting rifles and shotguns. Shoot and enjoy, life is too short
Amen! Most shooters will never see enough 44 magnums put through their model 29 to wear it out. This whole thread reminds me of the subject of K frame magnums not being able to handle a steady diet of 357 magnums. I say enjoy your revolvers and quit worrying about shooting the revolver too much and wearing it out. After all, I bought my revolvers to shoot not worry about using them too much.
Regards,
Howard
Reply With Quote