View Single Post
 
Old 03-01-2012, 05:30 PM
buckshotshorty's Avatar
buckshotshorty buckshotshorty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 379
Likes: 86
Liked 298 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKFC05 View Post
When a manufacturer does not list certain of his powders for certain loads, I pick another powder.

Since the "speed" of a powder depends on how it is measured, you really have no idea of the relative speed of WST in a pistol loading relative to another powder.

Trying to guess loads based on rough guides of powder relative burning rate is extremely poor reloading practice, and a good way to blow up a gun. There are many proven loads for 147gr 9mm in the loading manuals. WSF and longshot, for example.
Cartridge Loads - Hodgdon Reloading Data Center - data.hodgdon.com

I would never use unpublished loads. I was just wondering why there weren't any published loads. He said to me that a great deal of testing goes in to each of these powders, and if no data is published it's because of no good results. Yet, so many people I speak to use and love WST in 9mm.
Reply With Quote