Thread: .22 Luger
View Single Post
 
Old 05-01-2012, 10:09 AM
dant's Avatar
dant dant is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 26
Liked 451 Times in 233 Posts
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by 310Pilot View Post
I used to get a lot of them brought in for repair when I owned a gun shop (in the 70s, while they were in production). The problems stemmed from poor quality parts and manufacturing, rather than under powered ammo. In fact, the most frequent problems were broken firing pins and broken toggle arms - more powerful ammo would have broken those parts even faster. They looked neat, but were completely unreliable. Cheap cast parts, poor tolerances and a lack of quality control were the culprits. I worked on one my brother had for a long time in an attempt to get it to work reliably, and finally gave up, the basic components were just too bad, and pot metal castings don't respond well to machining. They had a poor reputation when they were new, age hasn't improved them. Too bad, they would have sold like hot cakes if they had been decently made and reliable guns.
same here we went through LOTS of them, and they mainly got the nickname "jamamatic"...they came in either alloy or steel construction if I recall correctly,,,the alloy ones looked like '****' in little or no time with any amount of handling.................
__________________
dan
NRA Benefactor,PMA
Reply With Quote