View Single Post
 
Old 05-14-2012, 11:04 AM
baccusboy's Avatar
baccusboy baccusboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seoul and Iowa
Posts: 307
Likes: 3
Liked 81 Times in 53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brucev View Post
"For this very reason, I have no clue why Homeland Security went with the .357 Sig. Someone shoots one of those in an airplane and dozens of people are likely to get some pretty serious hearing damage. It's a lawsuit waiting to happen." You must remember, the decisions of the folks in HS as well as TSA, etc. are not predicated on what will best serve the paying customers. The choice of the .357 Sig. follows the same lines as decisions about intrusive searches, failure to profile, etc. It's not about the customer.
Well, I don't want to derail this into an anti-TSA thread (personally, I take my hat off to most of those people for doing the best with what they can).

I just meant to say that the .357 Sig isn't a good choice for airplanes due to the noise level. I do feel it's a tremendous round for highway patrol, for example.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: