Thread: 2400 vs #9
View Single Post
 
Old 07-10-2012, 07:03 PM
rck281 rck281 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 161
Liked 518 Times in 169 Posts
Default

I can't speak to #9 as I have never used the powder. Over the last 35 years I have loaded a lot of 44 Magnums with 2400 and W296. The older 2400 was quite dirty but it was changed a number of years ago to a much cleaner formulation. It also depends on loading density as to how much residue and unburned powder is produced. I like 2400 very much.
__________________
Dick
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: