View Single Post
 
Old 09-30-2012, 09:25 AM
Cerberus62 Cerberus62 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 140
Likes: 22
Liked 55 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul5388 View Post
The image Skip posted was from the 1980 era, when it was Hercules 2400. The load I posted was using 2004 vintage Alliant 2400. That leads me to believe there isn't an appreciable difference between the two powders, at least in the lot I have.

If there was more than lot to lot variation, they would be calling the new powder 2399 or 2401, not 2400.
Excellent point! I hear the same said about old / new Unique.

If the powder's performance changed enough to make the pre-change data obsolete they would just re-issue it under a new name.

On another point, H110 and Winchester 296 were/are considered to be the same powder using identical data.

In the 80's I used both and the powders were physically different.

The 296 looked like it does now, dark, small balls. The H110 was a bright silvery gray and with much finer grains.

Performance was similar, but not identical in grain-for-grain loads.
Reply With Quote