Thread: Shield vs XDs
View Single Post
 
Old 11-19-2012, 02:53 PM
Jagrmaister Jagrmaister is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 8
Liked 111 Times in 47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kris7047th View Post
Top trainers don't particularly care for the XD line due to issues that plague them more often than the M&P line. Looks and feel isn't everything. Reliability and longevity is.
Where are you coming up with this? I've owned an XDm before. Out of all the rounds I shot through it, it had 1 failure to eject due to an underpowered load. From what I've read, that's most other people's experiences as well. I only own the XDs currently from Springfield, but have never had an issue with the XD line of pistols in terms of reliability.

The M&P, Glock, and XD line of pistols all have "defects" that have risen over the years. It's going to happen in any mass-produced firearm, as these aren't handmade customs. Just because I've read someone online posting about how their Glock blew up, their M&P can't hit a barn, or their XD won't feed a round, doesn't mean I buy any of it. These are isolated cases, and as said before these are mass produced firearms that are going to have a margin of defect inherent in their production.

I think you're making a very broad statement with no factual basis. Glocks and M&Ps probably are selected and used more in shooting events, but I strongly doubt it's because of reliability. It probably has to do with initial cost of the firearm (XD line is typically more expensive), aftermarket support, and ergonomic preference.
Reply With Quote