Thread: Nano vs Shield
View Single Post
 
Old 12-08-2012, 01:09 AM
mag318's Avatar
mag318 mag318 is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 22
Liked 1,356 Times in 451 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyro View Post
I don't think the Nano is a close comparison with the Shield. It is much closer to Kahr PM9 or PM40. I have owned three kahrs and have handled the Nano. It is a lot like a kahr, but a little chunkier and heavier. I suspect the Nano may be a little more comfortable to shoot than the Kahrs and is also a good pocket carry. The Kahrs are a dream to pocket carry. I am not sure what a previous poster meant by the Quote: "the Kahr was a problem from the get go and Kahr could never cure the issues with its two decades old design". I still have one of the first K9's that was ever produced and have never had a problem. If I could only have one of those guns however, it would be the Shield.
Pyro, I have to agree with you on the Kahr K9. I too have an early one and though all steel it's one of my favorite small pistols. The Kahr is still in my carry rotation. I almost feel bad for those still having trouble finding a Shield, I bought 2 of them within a week, one online for $420 then the second from my local dealer for $341. My XDs on the other hand was $548 and my Nano cost me $385.
Reply With Quote