View Single Post
 
Old 08-09-2013, 05:56 PM
nitewatchman's Avatar
nitewatchman nitewatchman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 83
Likes: 8
Liked 31 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rngunner View Post
Any newspaper or documents I can post him, he has just started a website and have the Plinker advertised there.

He`s a good guy and I don`t want him to get things wrong.If you can post info here.

Thanks
Smith and Wesson Corp v. Plinker Arms LLC

Smith & Wesson v. Plinker Arms

Smith and Wesson v. Brookshire Tool and Manufacturing Company, Inc. d/b/a Promag Industries

Smith & Wesson v. Brookshire Tool and Manufacturing Company

Lightweight, low cost semi-automatic rifle magazine

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=p.../US8356439.pdf



One useful aspect for us of the 439' Patent is that is does have very complete disclosure of the details of the 15-22. In fact it describes and teaches more about the aspects of the rifle than the magazine. It would seem that this patent would have a lot of prior art and may not be very strong.

Of course it will cost you a couple of million to find out how strong the patent actually is. How many magazines would you have to sell to find out?

nitewatchman

Last edited by nitewatchman; 08-09-2013 at 06:02 PM.
Reply With Quote