View Single Post
 
Old 10-01-2013, 06:37 AM
chanroc chanroc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 51
Likes: 139
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelyfun66 View Post
Yes Sir,
I am ex-airborne infantry, and carried 60+ pounds of gear on my body in Iraq summers while under great duress from the enemy! A little ol' stainless revolver is not a problem, but I am wondering about the durability/shootability of the 66 vs 686.

Excellent advice and opinions from all you guys....
Never had a snub version of a K frame, but I do have a 2.5" 586. I love it and I can shoot it accurately. With that said, it resides as my nightstand piece. I've only tried a couple holsters but neither worked out for me. You may find one that does. The the others, try both out and keep which ever clicks with you.
I think both pieces will hold up just fine, unless you shoot a ton of hot hand loads. If that's the case, I'd give my nod to the 686. If you are looking for something small and rugged, I recommend selling both pieces and get a Ruger SP-101. (I know, blaspheme on a S&W forum. I love my Smiths. I have two J frames, two K frames, two L frames and a M&P 9mm, but the Ruger might just fit the bill).

Good luck and thank you for your service.
Reply With Quote