View Single Post
 
Old 12-18-2013, 08:23 PM
shouldazagged shouldazagged is offline
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
Default

Maybe I'm just over-suspicious, but I have my doubts about that one. The fact that it cites a "Presidential Advisory Committee" smells odd. For an ivory ban, including antiques and pre-ban goods? It would involve changing the law, and I can't see it getting through Congress with everything else they have to fight about. Nor do I see it as the kind of issue a presidential committee would take a hand in.

I may be wrong. I am on occasion. Frequent occasions. But I doubt this one.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Reply With Quote