View Single Post
 
Old 03-11-2016, 10:36 AM
TexasG's Avatar
TexasG TexasG is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Cibolo, Texas
Posts: 323
Likes: 511
Liked 96 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevens View Post
Agree 100% that it reduces the "safety" of the pistol and admittedly it takes it outside of it's design. Many would argue that you should NEVER employ it in any manner of defense for the simple liability of having to explain (gasp!) that you willfully altered a safety feature.



-HOWEVER!-



Beyond that...

Are ya guys kidding with us here?

You cannot seriously believe this is dangerous... really?



You'd now have to decock the pistol in the same exact way you'd decock a 1911. Or any revolver or ANY semiauto ever built that has an exposed hammer and no decock lever of some sort.



A 3rd Gen with SA/DA operation and no decocker is not at all an "unsafe" handgun unless/until it is in the hands of a fool.



Anybody care to have an adult discussion on how some ADDED safety features incidentally promote POOR gun handling?

Yeah, you talk like such an expert in the hobby. Instead of studying the manual of arms and the mechanics you ask for others input on altering the safety mechanisms of an excellently engineered and inherently safe pistol. As if somehow your interest in changing these features is justified because you hate the TDA design.

Then when confronted, you decide to that you want to have an adult discussion about safety features?

You epitomize all that most in our community and hobby disdain, and give the gun haters ever more fodder.
__________________
Glen
Reply With Quote