View Single Post
 
Old 02-15-2017, 02:24 PM
Mister X Mister X is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 414
Liked 2,249 Times in 1,032 Posts
Default

The gadget is an interesting device. Functionally, it doesn't really have too many downsides except perhaps limiting certain contact shot options, although that is likely insignificant. However, it is still unproven as far as I'm concerned and I don't like being a beta-tester when it comes to potential life saving equipment. YMMV

I have NY triggers on all my carry Glocks and consider them an adequate enough additional safety measure against unintentional discharges. I don't have gadgets on my hammerless revolver nor do I feel they need it.

I wonder if those who opt for a gadget also installed NY triggers, because it could be argued that if someone cannot assuredly safely holster a specific weapon because the trigger pull is too short and light(even in a controlled environment), how can they possibly be expected to be safe with that same weapon once it's drawn in a chaotic, high stress defense scenario.
Reply With Quote