Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinentalOp
I recall the .380 HST not performing well, but I couldn't remember the reason why. Inadequate penetration seems likely.
|
The HST suffered from failure to expand across the board in the lucky gunner .380 test.
http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self...-tests/#380ACP
Is it just me, or does anyone else here think that hardball is still the way to go with .380, for the most part, especially in the itty bitty automatics?
Not just because of the extremely erratic performance of JHP's in this caliber, but for sheer reliability, I like to keep the hottest round nosed FMJ I can find, in my little P3AT.
Right now its got Fiocchi ball in it.
In any case, .38 special is, IMHO, a more capable caliber then the .380, and if done right, I don't see why the HST loading wouldn't be a good one.
But it sure is off to a .....weird..... start.