View Single Post
 
Old 04-08-2017, 04:32 PM
BoogersXDm's Avatar
BoogersXDm BoogersXDm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 20
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinentalOp View Post
I recall the .380 HST not performing well, but I couldn't remember the reason why. Inadequate penetration seems likely.
The HST suffered from failure to expand across the board in the lucky gunner .380 test.

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self...-tests/#380ACP

Is it just me, or does anyone else here think that hardball is still the way to go with .380, for the most part, especially in the itty bitty automatics?
Not just because of the extremely erratic performance of JHP's in this caliber, but for sheer reliability, I like to keep the hottest round nosed FMJ I can find, in my little P3AT.
Right now its got Fiocchi ball in it.

In any case, .38 special is, IMHO, a more capable caliber then the .380, and if done right, I don't see why the HST loading wouldn't be a good one.

But it sure is off to a .....weird..... start.

Last edited by BoogersXDm; 04-08-2017 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: