View Single Post
 
Old 05-20-2017, 03:18 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 5,882
Liked 9,328 Times in 3,495 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo288 View Post
Another factor in favor of the 2(or3) piece tensioned barrel is the lack of any bulge or obstruction where the barrel is screwed into the frame.
You're talking about a bore constriction, right? I check any new revolver I get by dropping the largest pin gage that'll enter the muzzle down the bore & check that it smoothly passes all the way thru. Only found one of my S&Ws that had a noteworthy constriction that I had to hand-lap out. The 2-piece barrels do eliminate that problem.

. . .

I believe the forcing cones are cut (formed) better in these EDM/ECM multi-piece barrels too. They always seem to be smoother & uniformly done, unlike the one-piece barrels I tend to see that are (apparently) cut as a separate step from the rifling having circular grooves & rough transitions.

(Below left, my 2-3/4" M69's barrel extension & forcing cone; my 686+'s on the right.)

.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day

Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 06-12-2018 at 01:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: