View Single Post
 
Old 06-29-2017, 06:54 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 3,622
Liked 5,211 Times in 2,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snm8510 View Post
So technically, the 165 should have better ballistics and yield lower recoil?

I was just wondering performance from a short barrel

Not really. You aren't getting those MV from your own short barrel, which will not match published test barrel data. This is why I have a chronograph and measure what I get from MY guns, not some test barrel.
ME is mass x MV x MV, so drops very rapidly in short barrels.
My first choice would be the short barrel ammo in a short barrel for controllability.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote