Dear Content Scraper: What are you 16? This article was lifted in whole from Shooting Illustrated. Seriously OP, you can link it, but just lifting it in totality steals revenue from the sight/author that owns the copyright. There are no less than six advertisements accompanying the article on it's proper sight. They pay to be there. These advertisements generally provide the revenue that pay the author and fund the web site.
It is unthinkable that the moderators haven't addressed this breach of intellectual property unless the NRA which owns Shooting Illustrated explicitly allows this.
Here is what the U.S. Government says: “The distinction between what is fair use and what is infringement in a particular case will not always be clear or easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.”
About the Fair Use Index | U.S. Copyright Office. Taking virtually every single word is clearly infringement as it is not quotation of a short passage or passages for a scholarly work, or use of a short passage or passages for criticism of the work, or use in a parody, or summary of an article with brief quotations in a news report.
Finally, Copyright infringement is illegal and in some cases criminal. There exists a broad choice of civil actions that can be imposed, criminal cases have also occurred in certain instances.