View Single Post
 
Old 08-13-2017, 02:14 PM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 2,256
Liked 3,495 Times in 1,485 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13 View Post
So the OP was mostly right after all. Even though alot of people here don't want to acknowledge there's an issue, Sig has.
They are the responsible party.

No fanboy here of any manufacturer, I look at the truth. Defective/poorly engineered guns/hammers/refrigerators/shoes, etc have been produced since day one.
One question regarding Sig, seems to be just how long ago did they know about the issue? Some folks are mighty angry about the possibility of Sig continuing to manufacture firearms where they knew that there was a specific problem. One thing in Sig's favor is that there have been so few reported accidents with the Sig P320 pistols. If the problem was known (and it may have well not been known) it might not have been a big priority with Sig's decisions. That, in hindsight, would have been a very bad decision as things now stand.
The Following User Likes This Post: