View Single Post
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:33 PM
bushmaster1313's Avatar
bushmaster1313 bushmaster1313 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,746
Likes: 477
Liked 16,754 Times in 3,311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryS View Post
It would be most unusual for the winning party to request a rehearing on a case that they had, uh, won.

An en banc rehearing wouldn't necessarily be bad for 2A supporters. When an appeal is heard, the rule is that the evidence must be looked at in the light most favorable to the non moving party. The non moving party being the side that won the last round.

Of course if the court refuses to rehear the case, it effectively becomes the law of the land due to the fact that it's the Appeals Court for the District of Columbia. At least that's how I understand it. Not being a lawyer and all, there is a good chance I don't understand it.
The losing party has petitioned the full circuit to rehear the case
The winning party is not allowed to say anything to the circuit about the petition to rehear unless the circuit grants permission.

A rehearing would be very bad. The full circuit would hear the appeal all over again. Moreover, INHO they would only agree to rehear if they were prepared to negate the pro 2A win

BTW I am a lawyer.
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly

Last edited by bushmaster1313; 08-30-2017 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote