Originally Posted by RGVshooter

That's standard procedure during any investigation. When I say "Investigation" it doesn't mean the man, (the shooter) is under "investigation", it basically means that the detectives working the case will gather facts, and make a decision if anyone broke the law. In this case, it appears to be a clear cut example of justified shooting. The dog owner had a history with the animal in the past and the dog was clearly a danger to the public. He'll get his gun back in the end I'm sure on that...