Quote:
Originally Posted by pistolpal
Hold on you guys. The incident was over and he followed the man outside the shooting location and THEN shot and killed him. He did not have to do that. He was not "stopping" a shooting-it had occurred and he was outside provoking and shooting a man. My guess is this is going to result in a serious lawsuit.
But keep in mind, we do NOT know all the circumstances. Perhaps he truly DID have to shoot to save further harm to others.
Running out the door AFTER somebody and blazing away at someone LEAVING the scene is not a "necessary shoot" in some opinions.
|
Nothing in the article says that anyone chased him outside. In fact it says the shooter shot from outside and 2 bystanders, already outside, removed a gun from their vehicles and approached the 20 yr old shooter (who had ear and eye protection on). Also, "blazing away"? They repeatedly BEGGED for him to drop his gun and he refused and actually shot at them 1st.