View Single Post
 
Old 06-23-2018, 09:47 PM
mikepriwer mikepriwer is online now
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 917
Liked 6,391 Times in 1,311 Posts
Default June 23 2018

Here is the updated list, with the latest three additions.

8* no caliber roll marking
23* no caliber roll marking
32* no caliber roll marking
40* no caliber roll marking
179* no caliber roll marking
213* no caliber roll marking
225* no caliber roll marking
406* no caliber roll marking
757* no caliber roll marking
776* no caliber roll marking
1254 no caliber roll marking
1404 no caliber roll marking
1923 no caliber roll marking
1949 no caliber roll marking
3371 no caliber roll marking
3450* no caliber roll marking
3497* no caliber roll marking
3695 no caliber roll marking
3733* no caliber roll marking
3865 no caliber roll marking
5001 - 6000 Navy Contract no caliber roll marking
5007 - Navy Contract - no caliber roll marking
5256 - Navy Contract - no caliber roll marking
5445 - Navy Contract - no caliber roll marking - USN 355
5501 - Navy Contract - no caliber roll marking
5646 - Navy Contract no caliber roll marking
5694 - Navy Contract no caliber roll marking
5779 - Navy Contract no caliber roll marking
5946 - Navy Contract no caliber roll marking
5950 - Navy Contract - no caliber roll marking
6215 no caliber roll marking
6725* no caliber roll marking
7082* no caliber roll marking
7311* no caliber roll marking
7457* no caliber roll marking
7464* no caliber roll marking
7485* no caliber roll marking

7546 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
7583* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
7719* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
7722* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
7787* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8493 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8495* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8636* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8820* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8929* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
8939* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
9986* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
10471 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
10607* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
10631* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
10643* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
11587* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
11972* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
12089* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
12286* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
13001 - 14000 Army Contract S&W 38 MIL
13030* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13135* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13245* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13262* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13274* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13519* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13552* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
13767* S&W 38 MIL (Army Contract)
14048* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
14669* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
14797* - .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
14810 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
15031* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
15051* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
15330* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
15851* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
16128* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
16916* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17085 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17278* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17452* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17479* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17571* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17577* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17668* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
17813* S&W 38 MIL Dec 1902 Probably Army contract over-run barrel
18291 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG

19155* no caliber roll marking

19593* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
19759* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG Feb 1902
20114 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
20684 .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
20726* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG
20802* .38 S&W SPECIAL CTG

7676: I believe the barrel on this revolver has been replaced, and probably with one
that has no caliber marking. The gun has a date stamp of 12.21.28 on the
rear grip strap, and is also stamped <B> on the bottom of the grip frame.
Additionally the flat under the barrel is stamped <B>. Most importantly, the
serial number on the flat under the barrel is stamped with a much-later set of
number stamps, and is stamped backwards. The 1899 ( and later) barrel serial
numbers were stamped so that it is read from left to right with the barrel pointing
to the right, and with the first digit of the serial number closest to the frame.
The serial number on this barrel is stamped upside-down, so that the barrel
must be pointed to the left, in order to be readable. In this orientation, the
last digit of the serial number is closest to the frame. For these reasons, I have
removed the revolver from the survey. The owner has sent me pictures
documenting these stampings.


Thanks for your help, Mike Priwer
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: