Thread: .380
View Single Post
 
Old 07-06-2018, 02:28 PM
Imissedagain's Avatar
Imissedagain Imissedagain is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 3,482
Liked 4,240 Times in 1,900 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al W. View Post
Folks say that the .380 blow back barrels are more lightly constructed than other SA barrels that use the linkage system. So its said that you can get barrel bulges and other problems if you push the loads. If you make even a cursory examination of a blow back pistol the thickness of the barrel is clearly thinner than any linked pistol I own. Its one of the reason that you seldom see production models of 9mm luger with the blow back system.
Or so my reading leads me to believe.
Always willing to change my opinion in the face of facts !
Blowback and locked breach...... different designs..
but barrel thickness ?
Sig238 vs S&WALTHER PPKs .... while a new HD-CA Sig is on the way and the 460 Snub is ill .... will keep using the Equinox....
my boy left behind.

Last edited by Imissedagain; 07-06-2018 at 02:29 PM.
Reply With Quote