View Single Post
 
Old 08-13-2018, 10:28 AM
03hemi's Avatar
03hemi 03hemi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4,469
Liked 5,852 Times in 1,908 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq View Post
I think the BATF has changed the rules again, and you now have to have an original shoulder stock for the Luger pistol for it to be excluded from NFA rules. Plus not just any original mfg Luger pistol stock. In some instances the language on the 2018 updated C&R list Section III gives very precise model and variation (and in one case numerical dimentions) of the proper stock which may only be attached to a certain Luger pistol and not be in violation of NFA regs if not registered.

All the other shoulder stocked pistols on the list (Steyr, Inglis, Colt, Mauser ect) they all state 'original mfg' stock too. I do not see the once listed notations about repro stocks of authentic style and dimentions being acceptable any more.

I would check directly with the BATF Technology Div for an even better up to date ruling. Old letters and ruling mean nothing if they are over ruled and out dated. It's easy to get sideways of NFA.

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/un...-2018/download.
Especially when they can write laws as they seem fit with the stroke of a pen without any due process, that's why Trump (and I'm a huge Trump supporter) and the NRA has passed the buck onto them to rule on the bumpstocks and other things so they don't have to take the heat, they just blame the ATF and their hands are clean.
__________________
Dave Ramsey Cultist
Reply With Quote