View Single Post
 
Old 09-14-2018, 11:41 AM
RGVshooter RGVshooter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,112
Liked 1,609 Times in 660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by typetwelve View Post
Here's a video that I didn't expect to see, neither did the maker:

YouTube

(Cliff notes, MAC did some side by side testing of 9mm +P, .38 +P and .357 in short barrel revolvers. 9mm +P performed the best in terms of velocity.)


I stopped watching MAC videos after this....Although visually entertaining I highly suspect some of his videos are "edited" especially some of the gauntlet ones. that and he goes out of his way to explain what knife he uses to cut open the gel. I mean, in explicit detail down to the name, model, name of manufacturer. He's promoting it... and when someone goes out of their way to promote products then I find the integrity of the results in the videos questionable...

Besides, velocity is fine but how does that translate into effectiveness of the round in it's intended target? 9mm in a revolver? A short, snub nose revolver? I think it's been proven time & time again that a 9mm performs best in a barrel at least 3.5" of length. A snub nose 9mm revolver? Might as well get a 380...

Last edited by RGVshooter; 09-14-2018 at 11:45 AM.
Reply With Quote