It sounds like the order to remove the firearms was correct in this case. He confronted the officers with a firearm and then refused to comply with orders to surrender the firearm and even fired a round. As an attorney, I believe this person, or any person, would not have his firearms returned after confronting the officers and firing a shot. The shooter would have proven the necessity to prevent him from owning firearms. Had he cooperated and not armed himself, perhaps he would get the firearms back. This is not a situation where all the people were being disarmed. That would be a horse of a different color.

__________________
That's gonna leave a mark.