View Single Post
 
Old 06-20-2019, 03:19 AM
THEmodelof1989 THEmodelof1989 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 494
Likes: 586
Liked 935 Times in 291 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatcat3 View Post
SUPPRESSIVE FIRE? your rules on the use of deadly force must be vastly different than ours. how much collateral damage do your dept.'s inflict on the general public? **** like this is what starts twisting my tail. Leo, sheepdog, tactacool commando, sniper BS. What ever happened to Protect and Serve?
Ugh... Once again, yes, suppressive fire. Once again, If law enforcement gets to the point they are using explosives to incapacitate, then they've BEEN using suppressive fire to keep the clown from shooting back; or do you think they threw ROE out the window and just went straight to using explosives?

If your tail is already starting to get twisted up, I'd just move on if I were you. I have a sneaking suspicion that you're not going to find any satisfaction asking me possible tactics one can use to engage and incapacitate active shooters.
__________________
Ban this man,
'89
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: