Thread: S&W 317 v. 351
View Single Post
 
Old 06-12-2020, 08:04 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is online now
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 5,005
Liked 21,341 Times in 6,441 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMS View Post
Question: Generally, for deep penetration purposes, would the current-day powerful .22 LR ammo (Aguila Super Maximum 30 gr. or CCI Mini Mag 36 gr., etc.) out of the 3" 317 bbl. be at least equal to the most powerful .22 WMR ammo (Winchester Supreme 34 gr., etc.) out of the 1 7/8" 351 bbl.?

Fifteen or so years ago, after my informal but repeated testing in phone books with both of those revolvers, no .22 LR ammo from the 317, including Stingers, even came close to the penetration of Win. Supreme 34 gr. WMR HP's from the 351. Expansion is a separate matter and a little info on the internet about expansion can be found..

Today, however, I don't have a 317, an indoor place to do repeated, measured penetration testing or current-day ammo such as the hot Aguila Super Magnum .22 LR or 36 gr. Maxi Mag ammo. Nor have I found any actual testing of those two revolvers pitted against each other on the internet.
I have owned both the 317 and still have a 351C. I have never really done a penetration test. My 317 only had a 2 inch barrel and I used CCI Velociters in it. Just shooting them at the range, I would have to give the "shock & awe" value to the 351C.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: