View Single Post
 
Old 07-31-2020, 08:09 AM
MajorD MajorD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 35
Liked 963 Times in 499 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmex View Post
It wasn't hard for S&W to chamber their revolvers for the British 38/200 since that cartridge was simply the 38 S&W (not Special) with a 200 grain bullet. It seems like a giant step backwards to me from the previous 455 cartridges the British used. I guess what they really wanted was revolvers smaller than N frame or Webley Mk 6. Considering all the shortages they had in WW2, less lead in each cartridge may have been a factor also. I guess 38/200 is a powerhouse compared to the Italian 9MM Gilsenti with its 123gr bullet at 1000 fps for a whopping 300 foot pounds of energy. Not much of an improvement over the 380 ACP (9mm Kurtz) with its about 200 foot pounds.
According to the tests done in the 1920’s, the British claimed the short wide almost full wadcutter like 200 grain bullet at a very mild velocity of around 650 FPS was nearly as effective as the larger 45’s ( where have we heard this before?)
Unfortunately by WWII they had to change to a jacketed 178 grain bullet that was a very different shape ( similar to a modern 9mm profile hardball) which proved less effective.
I believe typical muzzle energy for the 38 S&W runs right below 200 foot pounds.
Reply With Quote