Since it has become popular to redefine the 1st Amendment in opposition to it’s intent by our Constitution and Bill of Rights, would it not make sense they would become emboldened and strike at our treasured 2nd? By merely introducing H.R.127, have they not made it clear their intent to usurp the 2nd Amendment and since the 2nd ensures our right, it also makes it clear (reference - The Federalist Papers : No. 46) it is incumbent that citizens are required to stand up against a tyranny. Calling H.R.127 an act of a tyrant would seem to be an understatement.