I got into the AR as my competitive rifle competitions evolved: M1903A3, M1MkII, M1A, then the AR. I earned my Master classification with it. Then I became disabled, and my trusted gunsmith passed.

I have been able to build a 26" upper match rifle that I use for mid-range F class matches. I have also built an upper in 224 Valkyrie which I hope to use for 1000 yard F class matches.

My rationale has been:
1. The cost per round to load match grade 223s is about half the cost (if not more) than loading 308 or 30-06 match ammo.
2. With the musculoskeletal injuries, the felt recoil of an AR is significantly less than my service and bolt rifles.
3. With an almost useless arm, the AR platform can be maneuvered more readily.
4. One of my long remembered lessons from ROTC covered the Militia and the expectation that when called, it is supposed to appear with arms of military style and caliber.
5. One of the other remembered lessons from ROTC was when behind enemy lines, utilize their weapons and/or supplies!

For me, the AR platform is just that much more adaptable!

__________________
Judge control not gun control!