Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > 2nd Amendment Forum
o

Notices

2nd Amendment Forum Current 2nd Amendment Issues- READ the INSTRUCTIONS!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-12-2015, 02:01 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,481
Likes: 1,155
Liked 18,412 Times in 7,285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
There's about 20 million background checks per year. Not much of a data entry crew would be needed to simply enter date, your name, ss# or other id#, gun manufacturer and ser# from a 4473. A few seconds each. A small contractor crew could do it easy.

Heck, the ATF processes over a million NFA applications per year which are WAY more time consuming with only 30 examiners total.

The notion that entering data from purchase records is just too big of a project for the Feds or state is laughable. To the country, I see no reason not to suspect the database(s) already exist. And according to what K22Fan posted above, it looks like your state does.
IF the information about the weapon were included in the back ground check, then sure that would be do-able. I mean 20 million a year is only 115 per hour, 8 hours a day 365 days a year, right? BUT as several people have already pointed out several times, there is no detailed info about the gun (like the SN) involved or transmitted during a background check. Only info about the BUYER.

Also that 20 million per year is only guns sold through FFLs - not private sales. Even in states like WA where the law says all sales have to go through an FFL with a background check, if there is no enforcement (which there currently isn't) then there are still a lot of private sales that aren't recorded. I'd wager that here in WA way over half of all private sales are still not going through the "required" FFL transfer. And very few states even HAVE an un-enforceable law that says private sales need to go through an FFL.

Lastly, that 20 million per year is just NEW sales - that doesn't do anything to get ANY of the older 4473 forms into digital format or anything resembling a database.

I still say that in practical terms, unless and until they pass a law that makes registration not only legal, but mandatory, trying to build an illegal registration database - and keep it secret - is, in effect, impossible.

Last edited by BC38; 09-12-2015 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #52  
Old 09-12-2015, 03:58 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
IF the information about the weapon were included in the back ground check, then sure that would be do-able. I mean 20 million a year is only 115 per hour, 8 hours a day 365 days a year, right? BUT as several people have already pointed out several times, there is no detailed info about the gun (like the SN) involved or transmitted during a background check. Only info about the BUYER.

Also that 20 million per year is only guns sold through FFLs - not private sales. Even in states like WA where the law says all sales have to go through an FFL with a background check, if there is no enforcement (which there currently isn't) then there are still a lot of private sales that aren't recorded. I'd wager that here in WA way over half of all private sales are still not going through the "required" FFL transfer. And very few states even HAVE an un-enforceable law that says private sales need to go through an FFL.

Lastly, that 20 million per year is just NEW sales - that doesn't do anything to get ANY of the older 4473 forms into digital format or anything resembling a database.

I still say that in practical terms, unless and until they pass a law that makes registration not only legal, but mandatory, trying to build an illegal registration database - and keep it secret - is, in effect, impossible.
If you read the OP, the subject was about FFls turning over their info to the feds upon closing. As far as collecting data for ongoing sales, it sounds like your state is doing it according to the above post and link.

You keep saying that no gun information is ever provided during a background check, just buyer info. I can tell you that in Tennessee, which is a point of contact state, the FFL must provide the following information to TBI to get an approval number on the background check.

The federal firearms license number of the dealer;
The business name of the dealer;
The place of transfer;
The name of the person making the transfer;
The make, model, caliber and manufacturer’s number of the firearm being transferred;
The name, gender, race, and date of birth of the purchaser;
The social security number of the purchaser, if one has been assigned; and
The type, issuer and identification number of the identification presented by the purchaser; and
Receive a unique approval number for the transfer from TBI and record this number on the firearm transaction record.

Tennessee law says that TBI is supposed to destroy records linking a specific firearm to a specific person. Yeah sure...

FFL system/background checks are the root of all gun control evil.

--------------------

For me it's not something I can escape anyway... I own NFA toys and have a handgun carry permit. I'm in the state and fed databases forever.

Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 09-12-2015 at 04:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #53  
Old 09-12-2015, 06:49 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,481
Likes: 1,155
Liked 18,412 Times in 7,285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
If you read the OP, the subject was about FFls turning over their info to the feds upon closing. As far as collecting data for ongoing sales, it sounds like your state is doing it according to the above post and link.

You keep saying that no gun information is ever provided during a background check, just buyer info. I can tell you that in Tennessee, which is a point of contact state, the FFL must provide the following information to TBI to get an approval number on the background check.

The federal firearms license number of the dealer;
The business name of the dealer;
The place of transfer;
The name of the person making the transfer;
The make, model, caliber and manufacturer’s number of the firearm being transferred;
The name, gender, race, and date of birth of the purchaser;
The social security number of the purchaser, if one has been assigned; and
The type, issuer and identification number of the identification presented by the purchaser; and
Receive a unique approval number for the transfer from TBI and record this number on the firearm transaction record.

Tennessee law says that TBI is supposed to destroy records linking a specific firearm to a specific person. Yeah sure...

FFL system/background checks are the root of all gun control evil.

--------------------

For me it's not something I can escape anyway... I own NFA toys and have a handgun carry permit. I'm in the state and fed databases forever.
Sorry, I should have been more specific.

The OP is indeed talking about the 4473 - a federal government form, and my comments were in reference to the NICS check - which is also a federal requirement - and does not include specific info about the gun.

You are correct that some STATES have gone above and beyond that. But that still does not put ALL 4473 forms nationwide into some kind of national "registration" database - any more than Washington's handgun laws affect yours in Tennessee.

And being on the NFA database and a registered CCW holder STILL doesn't tell the feds anything about your non-NFA firearms. Only what NFA items you have and that you MAY be carrying a gun.

Like I said, instead of going off on mis-directed diatribes about a FEDERAL form and FEDERAL background check somehow being tied together (they aren't) to create a supposed "secret" ILLEGAL federal database (that nobody has any evidence of) we should be devoting that energy to making sure Tennessee and Washington and all other states are following and not exceeding the reach of the laws that already exist. Not to mention working to get some of them overturned.

Last edited by BC38; 09-12-2015 at 07:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #54  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:00 AM
blujax01's Avatar
blujax01 blujax01 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
...

The OP is indeed talking about the 4473 - a federal government form, and my comments were in reference to the NICS check - which is also a federal requirement - and does not include specific info about the gun.

...
Like I said, instead of going off on mis-directed diatribes about a FEDERAL form and FEDERAL background check somehow being tied together (they aren't) ...
Well, they are.

I call NICS with the 4473 in hand and answer the questions pertaining to name, place of birth, ethnicity, race, state of residence, type of firearm, and S.S. if provided. They in turn issue a transaction number that I fill in on line 21B as well as a disposition (proceed, delayed or denied.).

So, the FBI has a listing of these transaction numbers and they could theoretically be married to the 4473.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:37 AM
Bill Bates's Avatar
Bill Bates Bill Bates is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 4,545
Liked 7,560 Times in 1,441 Posts
Default

Knowing how government agency work and get along. I'll bet that NICS/FBI and they ATF don't exchange much information.

In this day and age many larger FFLs Bound Book is no longer a bound book but is a computerized searchable data base that is approved by the ATF. I assume if they go out of business they don't print that data base but data is just transferred to the ATF.

If the ATF wasn't keeping that information in a searchable form there wouldn't be much reason for them to collect the information from the former FFLs. They would just have FFL destroy that information.
__________________
Bill Bates
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-13-2015, 01:02 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post

Like I said, instead of going off on mis-directed diatribes about a FEDERAL form and FEDERAL background check somehow being tied together (they aren't) to create a supposed "secret" ILLEGAL federal database (that nobody has any evidence of) we should be devoting that energy to making sure Tennessee and Washington and all other states are following and not exceeding the reach of the laws that already exist. Not to mention working to get some of them overturned.
Well it doesn't have to be a global event for the feds to collect info on all your guns. A guy deals with a LGS for 20 years. They go out of business..... all his purchase records are now in the hands of the Feds.

The OP is making a real observation. The only thing he is suggesting is that the feds aren't likely to just toss all the info in a pile but rather put on computer. Hardly a tin foil hat suggestion, particularly after dust-up over the feds storing billions of our cell phone records.

I agree on overturning unconstitutional law. The entire FFL system is unconstitutional as far as I'm concerned. Until the GCA 1968 is repealed, government at all levels will continue to collect information on our gun purchases.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #57  
Old 09-13-2015, 02:21 PM
ClayCow ClayCow is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 966
Likes: 29
Liked 283 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Cell phone records are digital to begin with. Its one thing to collect digital data, its another to convert from hard copy to digital and make it searchable.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-13-2015, 02:23 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,692
Likes: 57,549
Liked 52,819 Times in 16,468 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bates View Post

If the ATF wasn't keeping that information in a searchable form there wouldn't be much reason for them to collect the information from the former FFLs. They would just have FFL destroy that information.

They're just doing it in case..........
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #59  
Old 09-13-2015, 02:36 PM
ClayCow ClayCow is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 966
Likes: 29
Liked 283 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Could just be gocernment red tape that no one has bothered to change and people are just gettung up in a uproar about nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 09-13-2015, 05:38 PM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
It still has to get into the database somehow. They can scan the forms, but due to poor copy quality and variances in hand writing there isn't an OCR program in the world that will accurately translate all those hand written forms into searchable text. Sure its all in the digitized archives, as scanned images that have to be read by HUMANS to find specific info.

The only way to reliably digitize all the data into a searchable format is to hand-enter all the info. As others have already said, the BATF doesn't have the manpower - or the resources to hire the manpower - to even begin to tackle that.
Well, y'all better get in touch with your respective super reliable honest representatives and get some more money allocated so they can. Perhaps along the lines of the TSA hiring guidelines... I mean, after all...it's for the children.

Anyone who believes in the anonymity of the private citizen is living under a rock, or in Ted Kozinskis little house.
__________________
Halfway and one more step

Last edited by Old TexMex; 09-13-2015 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #61  
Old 09-13-2015, 07:30 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,481
Likes: 1,155
Liked 18,412 Times in 7,285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blujax01 View Post
Well, they are.

I call NICS with the 4473 in hand and answer the questions pertaining to name, place of birth, ethnicity, race, state of residence, type of firearm, and S.S. if provided. They in turn issue a transaction number that I fill in on line 21B as well as a disposition (proceed, delayed or denied.).

So, the FBI has a listing of these transaction numbers and they could theoretically be married to the 4473.
Thank you! Although you didn't mean to you just made my point. They collect info on the buyer from you BUT NOTHING SPECIFIC ABOUT THE GUN. They don't even ask for the serial number - just whether it is a long gun or a handgun. Unless and until they get their hands on that piece of paper they don't even have the buyer's address - just a name, a state of residence, and a transaction number.

If they got their hands on one of my guns and wanted to link it directly to me they can't just punch it into some computer somewhere and have it tell them my name. They have to get a court order, then go to the manufacturer and get the info about what FFL it was shipped to. Then they have to go to that FFL and look at the paper record to determine who they sold it to. If I bought it new from that FFL then they can look for me at the address I put on the form when I bought the gun. Maybe I still live there, maybe I don't. Maybe I have the gun, maybe I don't. Maybe I lost it in a boating accident, or sold it to someone I didn't know.

The ability for law enforcement to be able to follow this paper trail step by step and SOMETIMES be able to connect a criminal to a gun is the reason the old FFL records aren't destroyed. While a lot of these investigations hit a dead end somewhere along the way, some do actually allow them to connect a particular criminal to a particular gun. That is why they archive them. But it is a multi-step time-intensive process, not just a quick computer search.

The big picture here is that the ATF or even the FBI cannot look up a list of guns any of us own in some database - either by serial number OR by your name. The FBI can look up how many times an individual has had a background check to purchase a firearm from an FFL. But they can't tell you what any of those guns were without going to the FFLs and looking at the paper forms. Even the records of FFLs that have been surrendered aren't in a database - they also have to be searched by hand on microfiche viewers. By the way, ever use one of those? I have, searching newspaper and magazine articles for research in college. I can tell you they are not exactly what anybody would call a "registry" or a database.

This whole thread is about the OP - and some who have agreed with him - saying that the 4473 forms ARE (as in right now presently) a gun registration system. I'm saying they ARE NOT. Could they be used to create a registration database. YOU BET. Would it be a simple and easy thing for the ATF or FBI any other other agency to create one from them? NO IT WOULD NOT. Could they do it in secret - in direct contravention of the existing laws against it? NO WAY. They don't have the resources to do it, and if they tried, the number of people required to do it would mean they couldn't possibly keep it secret and not have it leak out. Not in the information age we live in and with that many people involved. Could they really do it without the cooperation of people voluntarily registering their guns? Heck no! There are HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of guns that have changed hands multiple times without the sale being recorded since they were purchased new, not to mention the hundreds of millions that existed prior to the GCA of 1968 that have never been handled by an FFL.

Now, if we want to talk about what COULD happen, or what could theoretically be done, then that would be an entirely different thread and conversation. It is definitely possible that they might somehow someday get laws passed to require us all to register every gun. And it is possible that if enough people knuckled under and voluntarily registered all their guns, then they'd have a good start at a gun registration database. But they'd have to start by requiring every gun owner to submit a 4473 (or similar form) for every gun they own. Then they'd need to follow that up with gathering up all of the existing 4473s from all of the FFL holders and hiring a small army of people to review and input all the data from all those forms into the database.

So far I haven't seen any evidence that this has happened. But some incremental steps have already been taken by some states. THESE laws are what we need to be focusing on and resisting. Allowing these incremental encroachments to stand, and allowing them to becoming more widespread are what we need to be focusing our energies on - in order to avoid universal registration becoming FACT instead of hype and paranoid hyperbole.

Last edited by BC38; 09-13-2015 at 08:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #62  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:12 PM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

You folks know what a "Demand Letter" is, right?

I say the first person to call another person "paranoid" loses!
In a debate that involves systems we know to be secretive, operated by persons we know to be untrustworthy ("...you can keep your doctor!")....how can we be so sure?
Dealing with an organization that did Fast and Furious, Tradewinds and others, the very idea that "getting a court order" is some sort of impediment is naïve...noble, but naïve.

So do I lose sleep over it? No. Does it effect my golf game? No, I don't play golf.
But I certainly don't pretend that the most powerful nation in the world does not have access to systems of which the average citizen is unaware.
And..I also don't pretend to know what they do in Washington State...but I do know what can and DOES happen in the "Border States". Even though the law doesn't allow it, the courts have said it's "within the purview...".

So don't put so much faith in the written....
__________________
Halfway and one more step

Last edited by Old TexMex; 09-13-2015 at 11:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #63  
Old 09-14-2015, 11:06 AM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

I Should be clearer, for those who don't know.
The Demand Letter 3 is used by ATF agents to visually inspect FFL records. I have been present more than a few times during these inspections/ interviews. The Demand Letter 3 is regarding long guns, higher caliber than .22 w/ detachable magazine. The only way I have ever seen these records checked is by an agent photographing page after page of the book.("we'll sort through them later"). These records include names and serial numbers and in spite what we have read in previous posts, this information IS permanently recorded, as it is intended to form a picture of behavior of INDIVIDUALS.
Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations - CBS News

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/at..._01_111207.pdf
All perfectly "legal".

As for numbers, ATF shows searches by request processing numbers at 360,000 in 2014. That's about a thousand a day, with no days off.... So how does that square up with the opinion that the task (searchrigin to point of sale onward) is so massive that it can't be done? It doesn't square at all. There is no reason to assume that the small violations are what we need to be exclusively concerned with. Rather, the overarching big picture is that federal registration advocates are relying on "small wars" to divert attention and funding to local/ state gun rights issues while the federal efforts will trump all those anyway.
I'll have faith in the "process" when the process is executed honestly.
__________________
Halfway and one more step

Last edited by Old TexMex; 09-14-2015 at 11:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #64  
Old 09-14-2015, 12:12 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Congress mandated that ATF centralize out-of-business records of FFLs by establishing a records repository in 1986. The ATF receives over a million out-of-business gun records each month. So all that information the ATF already has. It's so much that it accounts for 30% of the traces they get at least one FFL is gone and the ATF has the info in-house at the NTC (National Tracing Center).

The NTC via "Access 2000" has online computer access to the records of manufacturers, importers and wholesalers. This isn't a secret, it's right on the ATF's website. With Access 2000, it can put the ATF on the front doorstep of the FFL the gun originally went to or have the data in-house with their own records. I read an article that says in 2012 the NTC got 344,000 tracing requests. 90% success rate. It's not just a needle in a haystack paper and pencil operation.

I don't understand the argument that the ATF can accept a million FFL out-of-business gun records each month and are able to put them on microfiche, but entering a few lines of information in a database from the 4473 is such an overwhelming and budget busting notion that it could only live in the minds of the "paranoid".

Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 09-14-2015 at 02:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #65  
Old 09-14-2015, 01:29 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,692
Likes: 57,549
Liked 52,819 Times in 16,468 Posts
Default

So all those 4473's from defunct FFL's are just collecting dust?
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-14-2015, 02:08 PM
PALADIN85020's Avatar
PALADIN85020 PALADIN85020 is offline
US Veteran
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,440
Likes: 3,924
Liked 50,373 Times in 6,009 Posts
Default

1. It's the law - the 4473s are NOT to be entered into any kind of central federal database until such time as the FFL shop goes out of business and the forms are turned in to the government.

2. It's against the law, but I have few doubts that covert databases based on the 4473s or the "instant check" phone calls are being created at the federal level. The record of federal officials doing things in direct defiance of law is extensive, easily observed even now and verifiable.

3. We, as individuals, can also play the "computer game." It's worthwhile to create your own written or computerized database of whatever you own, with a specific notation on each gun as to where you acquired it - either from a dealer or in a (still legal) private transaction where no official record exists. And no one but you has the right to see it - if we can believe that the 5th Amendment is still in force.

4. When push comes to shove and Big Brother may eventually come for your guns, then you'll be quite aware of which ones they know about and which ones they don't.

5. And remember that the American Revolution began on Lexington Green when the overreaching British government ordered the redcoats to seize the colonists' firearms. American patriots had the guts to stand and fight then, and all hell broke loose.* Let us all pray that it will never come to history repeating itself. It would be immensely ugly, beyond all imagination. If soldiers or federal agents were ordered to go door to door to collect guns, they would have to make individual decisions: follow orders or follow the Constitution they swore to uphold, including the Second Amendment. Individual citizens would also have to make the gut-wrenching decision as to whether or not to fire on fellow Americans if necessary in defense of their inalienable and immutable rights.

John

* http://www.history.com/topics/americ...on-and-concord
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -

Last edited by PALADIN85020; 09-14-2015 at 02:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-14-2015, 04:03 PM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

The "Border States Initiative" and "Caribbean Neighbours" (I think that's what that one is called) both allow for the non uniform application of law, and are in defiance of equal protection under the law. Agents are acting under orders, issued based on policy. Misguided policy at best.

Trust but verify.
__________________
Halfway and one more step
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-14-2015, 06:24 PM
jdh's Avatar
jdh jdh is offline
US Veteran
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 116
Liked 1,116 Times in 510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobzGuns View Post
I guess it's actually a good thing that all my guns were lost in that infamous boating accident.
You got no proof. I kept pics of the contents of my residential security container after the Great Bastrop Country Labor Day Conflagration of 2011.



Since my homeowners policy had a limit o $250 on firearms and accessories I have not been able to replace anything but a used Jennings J-22.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-15-2015, 01:36 PM
wbraswell's Avatar
wbraswell wbraswell is offline
SWCA Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 6,619
Likes: 3,126
Liked 6,318 Times in 2,484 Posts
Default

Can y'all tell me where I can get a job with the Federal Government monitoring the Smith & Wesson Forum? I think I could handle that. Maybe some internet porn sites, too. Can I put in overtime?
__________________
Wayne
Torn & Frayed
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #70  
Old 09-16-2015, 10:50 AM
Bill Bates's Avatar
Bill Bates Bill Bates is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 4,545
Liked 7,560 Times in 1,441 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbraswell View Post
Can y'all tell me where I can get a job with the Federal Government monitoring the Smith & Wesson Forum? I think I could handle that. Maybe some internet porn sites, too. Can I put in overtime?
Move to Utah and you go to work at the No Such Agency complex where the NSA stores and monitors every bit of electronic traffic generated everywhere.
__________________
Bill Bates

Last edited by Bill Bates; 09-17-2015 at 11:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #71  
Old 09-16-2015, 02:47 PM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=PALADIN85020;138711719] [...]
3. We, as individuals, can also play the "computer game." It's worthwhile to create your own written or computerized database of whatever you own, with a specific notation on each gun as to where you acquired it - either from a dealer or in a (still legal) private transaction where no official record exists. And no one but you has the right to see it - if we can believe that the 5th Amendment is still in force. [...] [Quote]

From what little I know of computer privacy I suggest reconsidering making a computer record of the guns you want to keep out of data bases.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-16-2015, 04:19 PM
pharmer's Avatar
pharmer pharmer is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 8,968
Likes: 9,179
Liked 14,621 Times in 4,681 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
I don't understand the argument that the ATF can accept a million FFL out-of-business gun records each month and are able to put them on microfiche, but entering a few lines of information in a database from the 4473 is such an overwhelming and budget busting notion that it could only live in the minds of the "paranoid".
In the last 10 years, within 20 miles of where I sit, at least 2 dozen FFL's have "gone away." I have bought guns from 4 or 5 of them on 4473's. I'm sure the info is in a dark cabinet in Funk and Wagnall's basement. Makes me wonder if the ATF has a campaign to hound FFLs out of business over paperwork errors. Joe
__________________
Wisdom chases me; I'm faster

Last edited by pharmer; 09-16-2015 at 04:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #73  
Old 09-16-2015, 04:32 PM
younggun22 younggun22 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: IL
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 693
Liked 2,841 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Maybe we should start a conspiracy sub forum.

You bring the tin foil hats and I'll bring the Kool-Aid
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-16-2015, 09:59 PM
old bear's Avatar
old bear old bear is offline
US Veteran
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,701
Likes: 29,455
Liked 22,969 Times in 5,777 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Rat View Post
Do you have any idea the size of staff it would take to perform the data entry/scanning/etc. for the MILLIONS of firearms sold daily in America???

Don't even get started on the multi-millions that were available before this silly form was started!!!

It would cost more than the current HMFWIC could come up with.
Sir, you are, I believe, correct, but when was the last time you knew the government to really care what anything cost?
Come on, ya never heard of the uncle sugar make a job foundation?
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 09-20-2015, 09:21 PM
Ramikrav's Avatar
Ramikrav Ramikrav is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 92
Likes: 296
Liked 51 Times in 34 Posts
Default

As an American of Jewish descent who has studied the issues of gun control thoroughly because of the historic precedent of the Nazi regime's use of such in the implementation of the "final solution", allow me some observations:

First off, I am in no way shape or form suggesting this is Nazi Germany, or that gun control advocates are Nazis. This is just a little perspective, from my own unique point of view that I wish to share, please take it as such.

I do not believe for a second that the vast majority of our service members -who are our fellow Americans- in the military or the police would ever knowingly enforce a weapons confiscation scheme, especially not one that made people defenseless based on race, creed, or ethnicity.I ESPECIALLY do not believe our people would enforce laws that directly resulted in people being disarmed previous to being marched to death camps.

That being said, there is in fact enormous historical precedent for the abuse of weapons laws, from antiquity when they targeted contact weapons to today, being used by despots, oligarchs, and tyrants to facilitate their power and agendas.

Heck, the first battles that became our Revolution were fought when the British sent Hessian mercs to confiscate our arms at Lexington and Concorde.
They had their orders, we had our human rights, and that spirit will NEVER be extinguished in America.

Now on to the point, i'll try to keep it as short and sweet as possible-

In Wiemar Germany, the now defunct Republic that the Nazi's usurped, the democratically elected, liberal parliament passed weapons control laws because of street fighting between the various fringe groups, who were political groups that formed based on the relatively widespread belief in the illegitimacy of the Republic.

Among those laws passed was a registration of weapons decree.

When the Nazis took over, a Jewish man tried to assassinate a Nazi diplomat abroad, and it was all the nazis needed to amend those laws to directly target Jews -by name- for disarmament.

The Nazis did in fact use the registries, which were certainly not centralized on any modern computer bank lol, to target jews who were known to (previously to the Nazi amendment) legally own guns.

It was not difficult to search the records and the registry was very complete and thorough as to who owned what, easily leading the nazi regime's enforcers to who among the new "prohibited possessors" classes had what- resulting in pretty much no known effective resistance by Jews in Germany afterwards, to the "final solution".

It is merely an educated guess to presume that had the registries not existed -even in the primitive (by today's standards) form that it was- that armed Jews may have been more of a "problem" for Nazi authorities.

I like to think they would have been, given the heroics at Warsaw and those of the many armed Jewish partisans in other areas that were not previously held by Germany under the Republic and thus subject to its registration of arms.

Finally-
I do not believe that registration of arms is useful as a public safety measure.

In fact, weapons laws that have historically been used to oppress a conquered populace, a minority group, or lower classes in many other nations throughout world history, in my very humble opinion, make for very poor public policy in a supposedly free nation.

We are Americans.

We should not tolerate any form of registration,even though we believe that we will never see the kind of evil that has been noted abroad.

Lastly, we have had gun control as a public safety measure since 1934, on a federal level, with the NFA34; followed by the GCA68 in the 1960's (which some may argue is Wiemar/Nazi plagiarized), and Brady in the 90's. Including the now defunct "assault weapons ban" (also the 90's), thats 4 major federal laws passed in almost 100 years, add to that the thousands of local and state laws, and if you ask me, if gun control worked as a public safety policy, then gun control proponents would not be constantly needing to "demand more".
With all those laws being passed encompassing almost 100 years of our history, if weapons laws made for good public safety policy, we'd all be living in the violence free utopia that those proponents constantly promise will be the result of letting them violate, yet again, that which shall not be infringed.

The most glaring indictment of modern American weapons control laws is not in the history of how tyrants have abused such- its in the FACT that gun control is an abject failure as a public safety measure.

We don't need to play the "nazi card" to make this point.

Gun control has had almost 100 years, four major federal acts and countless other laws to prove any merit it may have had as a public safety measure.

If the NFA34 worked, how did Columbian cartels get FA weapons in the 80's?

If GCA68 worked then why is there a constant stream of dangerous people with records still abusing firearms?

If background checks worked, then how come the ever-growing list of modern mass shooters who passed theirs and were able to buy their weapons in accordance with such laws?

We do not need to resort to historical comparisons and attempted analogies between bloodthirsty regimes' abuse of such laws and the laws we have here to prove that gun control fails, and as such represents a burden on our unalienable rights as Americans that the government cannot justify.

Lock up KNOWN dangerous people in prison or asylums, yes.

Make it difficult for decent people to defend themselves from the nuts we DON'T know with Gun control, no!
__________________
Israel Has The Right To Exist.

Last edited by Ramikrav; 09-20-2015 at 09:53 PM. Reason: spelling.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #76  
Old 09-20-2015, 10:51 PM
Rustyt1953's Avatar
Rustyt1953 Rustyt1953 is offline
US Veteran
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ohio
Posts: 44,122
Likes: 61,588
Liked 188,363 Times in 36,197 Posts
Default

Ramikrav, you have certainly done your homework.

Well done.
__________________
Music/Sports/Beer fan
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #77  
Old 09-22-2015, 02:12 PM
Skeet 028 Skeet 028 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 6,332
Liked 7,047 Times in 2,984 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13 View Post
So all those 4473's from defunct FFL's are just collecting dust?
Actually no they aren't. According to BATF they are destroyed after doing a photo file or whatever they call it now. The dealer has to keep 20 yrs of records. When I had an inspection done at 27 yrs the inspector was really annoyed because I had destroyed records older than 20 yrs..but it is the law. When I went out of business I had to send in ALL my 4473s and my bound book.(I made a copy before hand) IIRC a written bound book is still required. I can check that though. The BATF can come check your records at any time just showing up. One guy had a portable copier and was making copies of EVERY 4473. I questioned what he was looking for after he had done 30 or so and though it kinda PO'd him I requested he stop and tell me what record he might need. Never did explain. Most ATF agents were courteous and forthcoming. Was checked by the FBI once about my ammo sales after a murder committed with a 9mm sub gun. At the time I had sold no 9mm from the lot they were looking for. No idea how they had lot numbers. They were very courteous..even friendly! I do believe there is a database of firearms that could be considered as a basis for registration. Trust your Gummit?? Shore ya should! I have title to the Chesapeke Bay Bridge and just decided to sell it. Cheap!! Interested in buying??
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 09-22-2015, 05:37 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,842 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default

Every gun owner also has a file on them. Heard it at the gun shop, so it is more true than the internet.

I'm going to destroy all my receivers and frames to build ghost guns out of all of 'em. That'll show 'em!

ETA:
My Wi-Fi just got interrupted...they must be hacking in...

Last edited by Rick_A; 09-22-2015 at 05:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:55 PM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

The men who allegedly killed Agent Brian Terry will go to trial shortly. Jury selection has begun. The Judge has ruled that the source of their weapons will not be allowed to enter into the evidence or testimony. Wonder why?
__________________
Halfway and one more step

Last edited by Old TexMex; 09-22-2015 at 11:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #80  
Old 09-23-2015, 01:19 AM
Skeet 028 Skeet 028 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 6,332
Liked 7,047 Times in 2,984 Posts
Default

Cause then they would have to charge the former AG...as he was an accomplice providing the weapon that was used...Yeah..a stretch but still truth. I hope they get the DP
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #81  
Old 09-23-2015, 08:36 AM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

All that, and the paper trail that was laid through purchase would be open to the defense and public scrutiny. That might show the files and the process with which those files were accessed. And the individuals whose names appear on those files. The serial numbers and the names.
Tangled web those 4473s are.
__________________
Halfway and one more step
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-23-2015, 09:17 AM
Muss Muggins's Avatar
Muss Muggins Muss Muggins is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,855
Likes: 6,981
Liked 28,085 Times in 8,897 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old TexMex View Post
The men who allegedly killed Agent Brian Terry will go to trial shortly. Jury selection has begun. The Judge has ruled that the source of their weapons will not be allowed to enter into the evidence or testimony. Wonder why?
Because it's not an element of the crime . . .
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #83  
Old 09-23-2015, 10:52 AM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,692
Likes: 57,549
Liked 52,819 Times in 16,468 Posts
Default

One thing's for sure, registration will lead to confiscation.


Man told can't have gramp's M1 as it?s an 'assault firearm'
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-23-2015, 11:06 AM
ClayCow ClayCow is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 966
Likes: 29
Liked 283 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13 View Post
One thing's for sure, registration will lead to confiscation.


Man told can't have gramp's M1 as it?s an 'assault firearm'
Quite misconstruing it. It was illegal to possess to start and he was already breaking the law. Most ofmy guns I buy new, I can easily say I sold it. I guess they could ransack my place.

But that does auck for that guy! Cops will probably place it in their collection
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-23-2015, 12:12 PM
Old TexMex's Avatar
Old TexMex Old TexMex is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South of the Nueces
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 23,812
Liked 20,090 Times in 5,871 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muss Muggins View Post
Because it's not an element of the crime . . .
That isn't the reason the Judge gave. Do you have some info I haven't been given? (Scratch that question, it's dumb, sorry)
edit:
You're correct Muss, I won't argue that, the judge did agree to the prosecution requests, and the origin of the weapons aren't at issue, the tracing therefore not necessary. If charges were brought framed in such a way as to involve the alleged killers as part of an illegal conspiracy then way to much information would be open to discovery. That's why I bring it up in this thread about the "paper trail".
__________________
Halfway and one more step

Last edited by Old TexMex; 09-23-2015 at 05:13 PM. Reason: clarification and apology
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 10-04-2015, 08:34 PM
Practical Practical is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 4
Liked 289 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Simply scanning the forms or actually recording the person filling out the form and streaming this image to a image processing software can easily create a electronic data base of every gun stored. Image to text transfer from scanned image or even video of reasonable quality is extremely accurate today...
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 10-04-2015, 11:32 PM
ClayCow ClayCow is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 966
Likes: 29
Liked 283 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Practical View Post
Simply scanning the forms or actually recording the person filling out the form and streaming this image to a image processing software can easily create a electronic data base of every gun stored. Image to text transfer from scanned image or even video of reasonable quality is extremely accurate today...
No. Try this software and then come back
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-11-2015, 09:07 PM
LostintheOzone's Avatar
LostintheOzone LostintheOzone is offline
US Veteran
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 4,490
Liked 4,461 Times in 2,182 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClayCow View Post
The NICS check is based off of the stuff you provide in 4473 isnt it? Its bern a while but Im pretty sure i did it digitally on base and at bass pro shops
Cabelas has you enter the data into a computer. It's a simple form that can be loaded on any desk top, laptop or tablet. No hard copy anywhere friends, just digital data. Of course you can generate hard copy if you want but it's just killing trees. Welcome to the 21st century.
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.

Last edited by LostintheOzone; 10-11-2015 at 09:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-12-2015, 11:18 AM
Watchdog Watchdog is offline
Banned
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post

You keep saying that no gun information is ever provided during a background check, just buyer info. I can tell you that in Tennessee, which is a point of contact state, the FFL must provide the following information to TBI to get an approval number on the background check.

The social security number of the purchaser, if one has been assigned...
The purchaser's social security number is not required on the 4473.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-12-2015, 12:01 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WATCHDOG View Post
The purchaser's social security number is not required on the 4473.
You're right. Nor does TBI.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #91  
Old 10-14-2015, 12:12 AM
hatt hatt is offline
Banned
All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms All 4473s are registration forms  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 467
Likes: 139
Liked 147 Times in 71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
It still has to get into the database somehow. They can scan the forms, but due to poor copy quality and variances in hand writing there isn't an OCR program in the world that will accurately translate all those hand written forms into searchable text. Sure its all in the digitized archives, as scanned images that have to be read by HUMANS to find specific info.

The only way to reliably digitize all the data into a searchable format is to hand-enter all the info. As others have already said, the BATF doesn't have the manpower - or the resources to hire the manpower - to even begin to tackle that.
We've had machines to read handwriting for decades. How do you think the mail gets delivered. Digitizing the forms into searchable data would be a simple undertaking for .fed.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATF Forms RedNeck Jim Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 16 09-19-2014 09:41 AM
4473s and Antique Guns Ben_hutcherson The Lounge 6 05-31-2014 12:45 AM
Happiness comes in many forms. walkin jack The Lounge 13 02-13-2014 06:30 PM
California DOJ forms for FFL SW CQB 45 The Lounge 6 10-16-2011 02:18 AM
M&P Rebate forms Firehouse The Lounge 2 05-06-2009 09:30 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)