Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > 2nd Amendment Forum

Notices

2nd Amendment Forum Current 2nd Amendment Issues- READ the INSTRUCTIONS!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2016, 02:05 PM
e3mrk e3mrk is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 93
Liked 2,689 Times in 897 Posts
Default BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation

ATF Reclassifies Critical Gunpowder Component as “High Explosive”

Update: The ATF has released an addendum to the June newsletter which suspends the reclassification pending “further industry outreach”.

Usually, I try to keep things fairly dignified and respectful here at Modern Rifleman, but the three ring circus at the ATF is making that more and more difficult with each passing day. Since I started this site, the agency has used broad regulatory decree to impose stringent and unnecessary new rules on NFA firearm acquisitions, unilaterally and wrongly banned Russian 7N6 ammunition, attempted to ban popular 5.56mm ammunition, and as of June 2016 has now chosen to reclassify wetted nitrocellulose (a critical component of smokeless gunpowder) containing more than 12.6% nitrogen as “high explosive”. The sudden move is expected by some to severely and negatively impact the ammunition industry.

See the full article here-
ATF Reclassifies Critical Gunpowder Component as “High Explosive”

Last edited by handejector; 09-03-2016 at 05:50 PM. Reason: copyrighted material
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2016, 02:31 PM
BaldEagle1313's Avatar
BaldEagle1313 BaldEagle1313 is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
Default

NRA-ILA | ATF Delays Any Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 09-02-2016, 03:14 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,884 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

There's been an extensive discussion of this over at the reloading section for a few days now:

New ATF regulations regarding propellants
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 09-02-2016, 03:23 PM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
Default

By the way guys, we may be just hearing about this but it happened in June. Nothing has changed since then

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 09-02-2016, 07:22 PM
BaldEagle1313's Avatar
BaldEagle1313 BaldEagle1313 is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
There's been an extensive discussion of this over at the reloading section for a few days now:

New ATF regulations regarding propellants
Thanks, Erich. I don't usually go into the reloading section because I don't reload.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 09-02-2016, 08:14 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,884 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldEagle1313 View Post
Thanks, Erich. I don't usually go into the reloading section because I don't reload.
You're missing out, amigo! Reloading's a blast, and it takes care of all that extra cash you're stumbling over.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 09-02-2016, 08:19 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is online now
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,515
Likes: 1,178
Liked 18,468 Times in 7,306 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
You're missing out, amigo! Reloading's a blast, and it takes care of all that extra cash you're stumbling over.
LOL, "reloading's a blast"...
I see what you did there
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 09-02-2016, 08:22 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,884 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

Thanks for noticing - my wife is of the opinion that it's rare that anyone but me finds me funny!

OT: I've got a good friend and colleague who just called to tell me he's taking a job in Spokane.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-02-2016, 08:49 PM
BaldEagle1313's Avatar
BaldEagle1313 BaldEagle1313 is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
You're missing out, amigo! Reloading's a blast, and it takes care of all that extra cash you're stumbling over.
"Extra cash" Hmmm... Ex-wife and three daughters... I am unfamiliar with this "extra cash" term.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 09-02-2016, 09:43 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is online now
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,515
Likes: 1,178
Liked 18,468 Times in 7,306 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
Thanks for noticing - my wife is of the opinion that it's rare that anyone but me finds me funny!

OT: I've got a good friend and colleague who just called to tell me he's taking a job in Spokane.
Is he a firearms enthusiast or outdoorsman? If so I'm sure he'll love Spokane.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 09-02-2016, 09:49 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,884 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

They're all outdoorsy, but his 20-yr-old is a sportsman and will love it.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-02-2016, 09:53 PM
les.b's Avatar
les.b les.b is offline
US Veteran
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 104,950
Liked 22,296 Times in 4,529 Posts
Default

Not to drift the thread, but you guys remind me of my youngest son: he has a wife and two kids, is buying a house, has two cars, two Harley-Davidsons, just bought a boat, has taken up home brewing, and plays golf. Oh, yes..... He "borrows" my guns, and ammo. Now he thinks he would like to take up reloading. My question: "With what?"... You can't have any money left!!". Well... At least he likes to shoot, and likes guns. Oh yeah, those are my Pings he's playing golf with too.

But to get back to the OP's thread: I too am worried by the cumulative effect of all of these regulatory changes that are impinging slowly but surely on our firearms activities. I believe that each one of these is part of a bigger picture which is designed to supress our civil rights, one little bit at a time. A "Death by a thousand cuts" approach, if you will.

Best Regards, Les
__________________
SWCA 3084, SWHF 495, PGCA 3064

Last edited by les.b; 09-02-2016 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Add thought
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 09-02-2016, 10:05 PM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
STCM(SW) STCM(SW) is online now
US Veteran
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,492
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,594 Times in 3,225 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
Is he a firearms enthusiast or outdoorsman? If so I'm sure he'll love Spokane.
Well, not Spokane County that much but just go north to Stevens or Pend Oreille County has lots of out door things for us hunters and shooters..
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-02-2016, 10:36 PM
BaldEagle1313's Avatar
BaldEagle1313 BaldEagle1313 is offline
Member
BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation BATF Proposes Changes to Nitrocellulose Regulation  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 1,139
Liked 1,477 Times in 594 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by les.b View Post
But to get back to the OP's thread: I too am worried by the cumulative effect of all of these regulatory changes that are impinging slowly but surely on our firearms activities. I believe that each one of these is part of a bigger picture which is designed to supress our civil rights, one little bit at a time. A "Death by a thousand cuts" approach, if you will.

Best Regards, Les
You're right on the money, Les. I have some work people who are all "they aren't going to repeal the 2nd amendment, they'll never get the votes to do that" and I tell them that's true, but they don't need to repeal it. They just need to get the SCOTUS packed with people who will "redefine" what it means, and the next thing you know they've narrowed the definition so far no one but the government can have firearms.

I think that middle comma in the 2nd was supposed to be a period, and the quill slipped.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mr. Jinks letter to BATF on Antiques... gmborkovic S&W Antiques 4 12-11-2015 07:53 PM
My new model 66 BATF bigl1911 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 0 04-20-2014 06:31 PM
BATF vs California LGS smokindog The Lounge 16 03-17-2014 06:15 PM
BATF at it again! Magazine limits, rails, lights, etc Prepper 2nd Amendment Forum 9 04-24-2011 07:30 PM
Interesting Reading, BATF Arrest m-1911 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 18 07-02-2008 05:46 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)