|
|
02-24-2017, 04:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 4,172
Liked 2,327 Times in 1,194 Posts
|
|
Petition On Re-Importation of US M1 Rifles and Carbines: Deadline, 23 March, 2017
I checked with Chad, and he felt this posting was within forum guidelines.
There are literally hundreds of thousands of M1 Garand, M1
Carbine and GI 1911s overseas, in South Korea, Turkey, and
elsewhere. The previous POTUS issued Executive Order 13637,
which prohibited the re-importation of all US military firearms,
regardless of vintage.
There is currently a citizen's petition page on Whitehouse.gov,
requesting our current President to rescind Executive Order
13637, and allow the re-importation of Garands, carbines,
ammunition, etc.
If the petition receives 100,000 online-signatures in 30 days,
the Administration is required to consider the petition and make
a disposition on it.
Currently there are less than 3,500 signatures. We have until
March 23d, to hit 100K.
Take a look and see what you think--if you agree, pass it on.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...ve-order-13637
Last edited by Steve912; 02-24-2017 at 07:14 PM.
Reason: Add deadline to title.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-25-2017, 09:17 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 1,214
Liked 2,481 Times in 714 Posts
|
|
Thanks for posting the link. I think it is insane at our millions of soldiers relied on these firearms to defend our nation, but now they are "evil guns" that can't be brought in and sold. Plus does the CMP funds go into the national treasury??
|
02-25-2017, 09:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Petition
Signed petition.
|
02-25-2017, 09:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: S/W Illinois
Posts: 923
Likes: 555
Liked 1,152 Times in 445 Posts
|
|
Signed the petition!
|
02-25-2017, 10:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
Signed and emailed link to friends.
|
02-25-2017, 11:47 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 21,225
Liked 7,141 Times in 1,995 Posts
|
|
Petition signed. Everyone be sure to complete the process by verifying your E-mail link.
__________________
Dave Brown
SWCA #3279
|
02-25-2017, 12:23 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peyton
...does the CMP funds go into the national treasury??
|
No.
The Civilian Marksmanship Program is a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization, chartered by the United States Congress.
The CMP is not a federal agency. It has no say so in political or legislative decisions affecting firearms importation or reimportation.
Apart from a donation of surplus .22 and .30 caliber rifles in the Army's inventory to the CMP, the CMP receives no federal funding.
Its sales revenues help fund gun safety training and marksmanship programs for young shooters.
They do good work with their limited revenue.
|
02-25-2017, 02:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: nebraska
Posts: 987
Likes: 1,406
Liked 936 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
CMP will only get guns that where loaned to a country, ie. military assistance program (MAP). If the country has bought them, they have to be brought in via an importer.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-26-2017, 06:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 290
Likes: 547
Liked 177 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
signed and dswancutt is correct, those guns will come in commercial not CMP unless they officially still belong to the US Armed Services and were loaned to those foreign countries.
__________________
MA Gun Law & NRA Instructor
|
02-26-2017, 07:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 4,172
Liked 2,327 Times in 1,194 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LenS
signed and dswancutt is correct, those guns will come in commercial not CMP unless they officially still belong to the US Armed Services and were loaned to those foreign countries.
|
Either way works for me
|
02-26-2017, 08:14 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NE FL
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 1,407
Liked 4,022 Times in 1,259 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D Brown
Petition signed. Everyone be sure to complete the process by verifying your E-mail link.
|
Signed and thanks for the reminder
__________________
"Your other right........."
|
02-26-2017, 08:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 101
Likes: 124
Liked 75 Times in 40 Posts
|
|
signed and shared of facebook.
|
02-26-2017, 10:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minden, Nevada
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 2,014
Liked 5,296 Times in 1,736 Posts
|
|
I signed and confirmed.
|
02-26-2017, 10:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 15,735
Liked 5,251 Times in 1,622 Posts
|
|
Signed & confirmed.
Thanks for the heads up.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-26-2017, 11:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,918
Likes: 14,064
Liked 13,768 Times in 4,990 Posts
|
|
signed...There are lend-lease guns in the Phillipines & Turkey.......S Korean guns would be by an importer such as CDNN etc................
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Last edited by Mike, SC Hunter; 02-26-2017 at 11:03 PM.
|
02-28-2017, 10:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 237
Likes: 571
Liked 229 Times in 77 Posts
|
|
Signed. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
|
03-01-2017, 05:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 5,346
Likes: 11,606
Liked 9,019 Times in 3,193 Posts
|
|
Signed and verified. Thanks for posting this up.
|
03-02-2017, 07:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Portland (metro area), OR
Posts: 22
Likes: 508
Liked 70 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Signed and verified. Thanks for posting the link.
|
03-03-2017, 11:56 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: S.Eastern, PA.
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 2,576
Liked 1,634 Times in 566 Posts
|
|
Signed and verified. Thanks for the heads up.
|
03-03-2017, 02:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,905
Liked 5,333 Times in 1,869 Posts
|
|
I signed this and also posted a link on other firearms forums.
Jim
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-04-2017, 05:29 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: washington illinois
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 9,209
Liked 2,712 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
|
Signed verified and added to my prayer list.
|
03-08-2017, 10:56 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 2,862
Liked 2,777 Times in 1,165 Posts
|
|
Signed... and forwarded.
|
03-09-2017, 04:57 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ohio
Posts: 44,592
Likes: 61,812
Liked 189,851 Times in 36,602 Posts
|
|
Signed, sealed, delivered, I'm yours.
__________________
Music/Sports/Beer fan
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-14-2017, 12:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minden, Nevada
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 2,014
Liked 5,296 Times in 1,736 Posts
|
|
Just an idea; what about re-importing NFA firearms? Besides the M1 Garands and M1 Carbines, I'm sure we have exported things like M2 Carbines, M3 and M3A1 SMGs, 1919A4 machineguns, M14 rifles, etc. Am I the only one who would like to see some of these C&R NFA firearms imported and registered for transfer to qualified collectors?
|
04-09-2017, 07:43 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
This one didn't even come close.
|
04-16-2017, 09:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 6,477
Liked 4,038 Times in 921 Posts
|
|
For an update on Re-Importation, check out the article on page 89 of the April issue of the American Rifleman...
__________________
OGCA Member.
|
04-16-2017, 10:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 4,172
Liked 2,327 Times in 1,194 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchdog
|
Nope. There's just not as much interest in younger generations of shooters, in the WW2 weaponry.
|
04-16-2017, 10:21 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 21,054
Liked 32,463 Times in 7,773 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muddyboot
For an update on Re-Importation, check out the article on page 89 of the April issue of the American Rifleman...
|
Forum members can click here if they want to read the article online. The link will take you to the page.
I'd read the article when I received my issue of the magazine. It doesn't really say anything of earth-shattering importance. The article really isn't informative at all regarding the re-importation of defense surplus firearms, though. All it does is reiterate that the NRA has been part of a "long running effort to repatriate tens of thousands of M1 Garand rifles and hundreds of thousands of M1 Carbines from South Korea." The article goes on to mention that there's no clear public safety reason why these weapons can't be brought back home.
Other than that, there's no mention of any progress being made to achieve this goal, simply because there isn't any progress being made. The article is basically just a position statement, nothing more.
|
04-16-2017, 10:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 6,477
Liked 4,038 Times in 921 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchdog
Forum members can click here if they want to read the article online. The link will take you to the page.
I'd read the article when I received my issue of the magazine. It doesn't really say anything of earth-shattering importance. The article really isn't informative at all regarding the re-importation of defense surplus firearms, though. All it does is reiterate that the NRA has been part of a "long running effort to repatriate tens of thousands of M1 Garand rifles and hundreds of thousands of M1 Carbines from South Korea." The article goes on to mention that there's no clear public safety reason why these weapons can't be brought back home.
Other than that, there's no mention of any progress being made to achieve this goal, simply because there isn't any progress being made. The article is basically just a position statement, nothing more.
|
I think the fact that the Deputy Director of the ATF has suggested these more positive steps ( at least put them in writing) is a move in the right direction. Much more positive then the previous administration.
__________________
OGCA Member.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|