Cert Denied :( NJ carry permit pushed to June 11, 2020 Conference

[bushmaster1313]

UPDATE 6.3.20
On June 1, 2020, the New Jersey "May Issue" case, and the nine other Second Second Amendment Petitions pending before the Supreme Court, were pushed again, this time to the Conference of June 4, 2020. The last Conference before the Summer Recess is June 25 and the last announcement on Petitions before the Summer Recess is probably June 29.

[bushmaster1313]

UPDATE 6.9.20
On June 8, 2020, the New Jersey "May Issue" case, and probably the nine other Second Second Amendment Petitions pending before the Supreme Court, were pushed again, this time to the Conference of June 11. The last conference before the Summer Recess is June 25 and the last announcement on Petitions before the Summer Recess is probably June 29.

[schutzen-jager]

even if it is heard + ruled on favorably it will have no effect on NJ law for many years - any change will have to come on a state level to have any effective change ! - from Florida in 1967 till now any changes in right to carry laws have come about on a state level + never thru federal intervention or mandate -

[bushmaster1313]

6.15.20. Cert Denied

[schutzen-jager]

KEYY POINTS
The U.S. Supreme Court said it will not hear appeals of a slew of cases involving gun laws, dealing a block to Second Amendment activists
Supreme Court decides not to hear big gun-rights cases, dealing blow to Second Amendment activists


PUBLISHED MON, JUN 15 202010:09 AM EDTUPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
seek to expand the rights of gun owners.
In an order released Monday morning, the court denied petitions for appeals of 10 cases.
The action comes just weeks after the court declined to issue a substantive opinion in its first Second Amendment case in nearly a decade.

[schutzen-jager]

like I + many others have stated change is definitely more likely to be accomplished on a state level like all other states right to carry issues have been ! -

[fordson]

It is apparent that the SC made a de facto ruling with their “non-decision” that the states have the Unlimited right to regulate the “How” of the 2A. And the “How” can regulate the 2A out of existence.
I am extremely disappointed by actions of this supposedly conservative court.

Edit: I wonder if Sen Whitehouse (D-N.Y.) got to Roberts and some of the other Justices with his threats to pack the Court if they didn’t tow the “D“ line on gun rights.

[delcrossv]

Wimps. Threat of packing the Court is moot as long as R's hold the Senate, and will happen anyway if the D's take control.

Roberts is an accomodationist weenie.

[biku324]

They certainly let assault weapon bans stand.

[ladder13]

POI. Whitehouse is from RI. Schumer is from NY and has a long-standing habit of making comments such as those.

[dockmurgw]

An interesting read on the subject.

Thomas, Kavanaugh lament '''decade-long failure to protect the Second Amendment''' | Fox News

[fordson]

Originally Posted by ladder13

POI. Whitehouse is from RI. Schumer is from NY and has a long-standing habit of making comments such as those.

Thanks for correcting. Easy to get them confused.

[delcrossv]

Originally Posted by dockmurgw

An interesting read on the subject.

Thomas, Kavanaugh lament '''decade-long failure to protect the Second Amendment''' | Fox News

Beat me to it. So it's not Kavanaugh, nor Thomas.

[ArmednDangerous]

Originally Posted by fordson

It is apparent that the SC made a de facto ruling with their “non-decision” that the states have the Unlimited right to regulate the “How” of the 2A. And the “How” can regulate the 2A out of existence.
I am extremely disappointed by actions of this supposedly conservative court.

Edit: I wonder if Sen Whitehouse (D-N.Y.) got to Roberts and some of the other Justices with his threats to pack the Court if they didn’t tow the “D“ line on gun rights.

I think you are exactly correct.

[ArmednDangerous]

Originally Posted by schutzen-jager

KEYY POINTS
The U.S. Supreme Court said it will not hear appeals of a slew of cases involving gun laws, dealing a block to Second Amendment activists
Supreme Court decides not to hear big gun-rights cases, dealing blow to Second Amendment activists


PUBLISHED MON, JUN 15 202010:09 AM EDTUPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
seek to expand the rights of gun owners.
In an order released Monday morning, the court denied petitions for appeals of 10 cases.
The action comes just weeks after the court declined to issue a substantive opinion in its first Second Amendment case in nearly a decade.

Did we4 really expect any other outcome?

Who still doesn't get it?

It's Washington DC vs The American People

Been that way for a while now.