Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo
o

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:51 AM
trailblazer02's Avatar
trailblazer02 trailblazer02 is offline
US Veteran
FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ???  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hickory, Nc
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default FMJ vs. TMJ???

can someone please tell me the difference between FMJ & TMJ ammo?
is one more reliable than the other in revolvers or semis?

thanx,
t'blazer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:17 AM
Mack's Avatar
Mack Mack is offline
Member
FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ???  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 16
Liked 255 Times in 143 Posts
Default

FMJ has exposed lead in the base TMJ has no exposed lead.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2009, 11:32 AM
Reloader Fred Reloader Fred is offline
Member
FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ???  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Default

A full metal jacketed bullet is formed from the "cup and core" method. The cup, or jacket, has a soft lead core swaged under high pressure into the jacket, normally from the base of the bullet. The mouth of the jacket is normally crimped over the exposed lead core slightly to hold everything in place. Lately, some companies have been installing a copper disc over the exposed lead at the base of FMJ bullets, totally encapsulating the lead core to reduce airborne lead exposure.

A Total Metal Jacket is a soft lead core that has been swaged into the final shape and size under pressure. It's then electroplated with copper, which completely covers the lead. The electroplating is just a few thousandths thick, and the jacket isn't as heavy as a jacket used in the cup and core method.

This the reason TMJ bullets can't be driven to the same higher velocities as FMJ bullets. You're usually restricted to about 1,250 fps with plated bullets in handguns. They will strip through the rifling if driven much faster and tumble once they leave the barrel. I've had plated bullets tumble at 1,450 fps from a 357 Sig, but I'm able to run jacketed bullets at 1,533 fps through my 9x25 Dillon pistol. You also can't crimp TMJ bullets at the case mouth as heavily as you can a FMJ bullet. If the crimp is too severe, it will cut through the plating and the core will separate from the thin jacket when the bullet leaves the muzzle, causing an inaccurate bullet.

Neither TMJ or FMJ bullets are designed to expand on impact. They are intended to function in all pistols, and are best used for targets and plinking. The exception would be when used against signers of the Geneva Convention during time of war, where FMJ bullets are pretty much the only game in town, but there is also some question about that rule, too.

Hope this helps.

Fred
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 11-21-2009, 11:40 AM
Canuck-IL Canuck-IL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Across the board, TMJ are less accurate than FMJ (or a good lead load). You'll see Bullseye shooters occ. use them at the short line or for indoor winter leagues shot at 50 feet, but never at the long line. The plating process apparently does not deposit evenly enough to yield 50 yard accuracy.
/Bryan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2009, 08:00 AM
trailblazer02's Avatar
trailblazer02 trailblazer02 is offline
US Veteran
FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ???  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hickory, Nc
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

ok, i can assume TMJ is ok for target practice at the range...i would carry some SD ammo away from the range.
thank you all for responding.
t'blazer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2009, 08:46 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trailblazer02 View Post
ok, i can assume TMJ is ok for target practice at the range...i would carry some SD ammo away from the range.
That's exactly what I do.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2009, 04:29 PM
scattershot's Avatar
scattershot scattershot is offline
Member
FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ??? FMJ vs. TMJ???  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 166
Liked 977 Times in 489 Posts
Default

Canuck, I would have never thought that. Thanks for the heads up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bullseye, sig arms

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)