|
|
|
05-04-2014, 09:32 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 3,791
Liked 1,844 Times in 469 Posts
|
|
Let's say that today, 2014, there is a person who is a sportsman who does not handload and he wants a good completely reliable hangun that he can practice with once in a while. He wants to carry it with him on hunting, fishing and camping trips for personal protection from everything from poisonous reptiles to rabid raccoons and predatory humans. He may hunt for small game or, if needed for survival, larger game. He does not want something complicated that requires lots of training and maintenance to ensure reliability. He will keep it as a home defense gun as well.
Perhaps some of us have known such people?
What would we reccomend? Whatever it is, if we are considering it seriously then it is certainly NOT obsolete.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-04-2014, 09:34 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7,520
Likes: 19,278
Liked 32,372 Times in 5,476 Posts
|
|
Obsolete works for me. So does Social Security and bifocal lenses.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-04-2014, 10:22 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
IMO, the 357 is not obsolete nor in danger.
What other caliber is chambered in J, K/L and N frame versions?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-04-2014, 11:39 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 6,989
Liked 9,332 Times in 2,759 Posts
|
|
Lest we forget the reputation of the .357 magnum 125 grain SJHP moving at about 1450 FPS from a 4" revolver barrel.
Put questionable statistics and jello tests aside, the actual reputation and legacy of this load as a highly effective defensive handgun cartridge from those who actually used it in combat speak to it's virtues that transend time and are still relevent in the 21st century.
The .357 magnum just works very, very well. It is not peerless, but it has stood the test of time and remains one of the greatest and most versatile handgun cartridges ever made.
JMHO.
YMMV.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-04-2014, 11:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 5
Liked 23 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
They said the same thing when the .41 Magnum came out.
|
05-04-2014, 11:57 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,914
Likes: 3,517
Liked 6,739 Times in 2,624 Posts
|
|
While we are talking about hunting use of the .357 Magnum, let us not forget the exploits of D. B. Wesson during his famous hunting trip used to promote the new revolver. Admittedly, .357 Magnum ammo is not loaded to that level these days.
That said, if you want to shoot the original without dipping into your remaining stash of $250.00 a box of 1935 large primer Magnum ammo, I suggest you keep a few boxes of Buffalo Bore 19C on hand. It is pretty close to the 1,510 fps of the original, with modern chronograph and "real" barrels/revolvers used for the test.
I would argue that there is no game animal alive that is capable of telling the difference between Buffalo Bore's 1,485 fps (4 inch 686 Mountain Gun) and the 1,510 fps (8 3/4 inch ".357" Magnum) of the original.
And, a real plus is that the Buffalo Bore uses a 158 grain JHP bullet instead of the lead semi-wadcutter of the original. Whether this will make a difference to the recipient of this "medicine" is anyone's guess, but it certainly might make cleaning the weapon after shooting a tad easier.
Also don't forget the "overweight" hunting-specific rounds, which use bullets in the 170 and 180 grain range.
While the 44 Magnum may have eclipsed the .357 Magnum cartridge for hunting, ammo makers have certainly not neglected development of newer, more effective rounds for that purpose.
|
05-05-2014, 10:39 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA.
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 4,510
Liked 4,492 Times in 2,190 Posts
|
|
You said this wasn't a revolver vs auto thread but you made the comparison anyway. So I will strike that in support of your argument.
The 44 mag looks to me to be too much of everything for most anything one would want to use it for. The exception would be for hunting.
I've had a 357 of some type for 40 years. Probably the most versatile revolver cartridge out there. Most reloaders who shoot a revolver know that. Recently I downsized to one revolver caliber. I sold my 44's with the associated reloading components and now only have 38's.
Ruger just chambered a bolt rifle in 357 and there is a huge shortage of 357 lever rifles as we speak. So it would seem the cartridge itself is doing quite well.
If a company like Ruger would team up with Federal and build a rimless 357 so it could be used in a carbine like an M1 or M4 it would be very popular.
__________________
That's just somebody talkin.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 12:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC Montana
Posts: 853
Likes: 90
Liked 483 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
I live out in the country and carry "something" on my hip most of the time. I might be on a tractor, horse or 4 wheeler or in the pickup. Although I like my 44 Special a lot, for a gun that'll do it all --- I can't beat my 4" 66.
It will outshoot my 40 cals (and my 9mms) and is lighter than my 44 mag or 44 Special. I can reload shot cartridges for it and kill a Coyote "way out there" with 158 grain hardcasts. If I run into someone causing trouble, I'm about as well-armed as I can be. The only times I choose a different caliber are when Griz are about or I'm after Ground Squirrels.
Many years ago, I really learned to shoot a center fire hand gun using a 2 1/2" 19 (which I still have). I wish everyone could have that opportunity.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 12:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 30
Liked 700 Times in 392 Posts
|
|
.357 Magnum is not going away soon.
I have a .44 Magnum, and on occasions carry it. Although it weighs 46 oz loaded, it is not particularly pleasant to shoot, and way overpowered for self defense against two-legged predators.
On the whole, a .357 Magnum, in a full-sized revolver, is about as powerful as most people can shoot well, with enough control, for self defense. Although there are some J-frame .357s, most people draw the line at .38 +P in them.
No handguns and few rifles have real "knock down" power. It's all a matter of shot placement, as long as sufficient penetration is achieved.
|
05-05-2014, 08:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 4
Liked 289 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44forever
What this means in this context is that if the .40 is more powerful, it will have more recoil - simple phisics. To try to fault a cartridge for having both too much recoil and too little power shows a lack of understanding. Education today is clearly lacking.
To say something is obsolete implies there is something else that gives equal or better results faster, cheaper, etc. and that something else is both more widely distributed and accepted. What pistol cartridge is more widely distributed and accepted than the .357 magnum?
|
I disagree, in my part of the country I can't find 357 magnum reliably the last 3 years. 40 S&W is readily available. Furthermore in terms of Lawman performance, the 40 S&W is the holstered equivalent of the 357 magnum.
Notice the bulk of American Law enforcement over the last century has used a cartridge with S&W stamped on it. They work effectively for human sized targets.
|
05-05-2014, 11:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Liked 526 Times in 288 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jframefreak
I'm obsolete too, so don't feel alone. I'm keeping my 357's too. I had a guy tell me that my 10 gauge was obsolete, and that I could get the same performance from a 12 gauge. He's probably right, but that 10 gauge is still real cool. I guess there's a lot of opinions out there.
|
Reminds me of an article on HD with shotguns. For 410, 20 and 12 gauge you use this and that. For 10 gauge, whatever the hell you want. LOL
__________________
_It was love at first shot_
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-05-2014, 11:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,249 Times in 13,829 Posts
|
|
The .357 can be...
The .357 can be loaded down as well as any revolver and more than most semi autos (without modification). It's a proven manstopper. Maybe a .44 would stop a little better but stopped is stopped in my book. I'm not likely to run into anything bigger than a black bear. If I go to the Rockies I'll get something bigger. IMHO the .357 is the lightest gun that can do anything I'm likely to run into. Besides, I LOVE loading and shooting it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2014, 02:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 619
Likes: 8
Liked 286 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
It's only obsolete to the guys who want a gee-whiz semi-auto with a 500-round magazine!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2014, 04:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,135 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
If the 357 magnum is so "obsolete" then what should we do with the "antiquated" 38 special....whoo-boy talk about over the hill!
I would love to have a model 19 in obsolete 357 magnum. But what do I know I like walnut, blue steel , real leather holsters and them old timey revolvers.
Gary
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-10-2014, 05:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 968
Likes: 1,729
Liked 808 Times in 378 Posts
|
|
Crazy talk. The .357 is great. That being said I recently replaced my SD/woods gun with a 10mm. So I understand how a Glock 20 in 10mm can make a better deal than my old M19. But saying that a slow .40SW round will out do a .357 is just ridiculous.
|
05-10-2014, 08:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 648
Likes: 598
Liked 879 Times in 293 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatCong
I agree, but hate to use it on the big bears to save my but.
|
Been there done that. Two years ago on the Appalachian Trail. Large female black bear went all nasty with me. Two Buffalo Bore .357 rounds out of a 6" Model 66-1 took care of the situation quite nicely.
Whomever says the .357 is obsolete is really quite naïve.
Bob
|
05-10-2014, 05:51 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
I loaded those 357mag 125grs JHP' s to 1597fps. When my python barked she meant business. She wasn't playing. I did load my ruger 44's to 1450fps. for ccw.
If Elmer Keith was here today he'd be all over this post.
I ccw carried the 357mag in my first ccw years. For most of my ccw life I carried the 44magnum. Now it's the s&w m58 in 41mag.
I have nothing against autos I do own a few. I prefer a magnum revolver.
I have a 350/400# black bear in my back yard. He visits often. If he leaves us alone he can have some corn or fruit from my trees I plant 75% of it for the animals. I was worried with my 145# rottie when my wife called her in maybe the misses wouldn't notice at 11pm if the bear walked in the house. My misses was about 25' from this bear already when she went to get my lab away from the bear. GOD was watching over her sort of speak. He just looked at the crazy lady screaming and walked slowly away. What an awesome sight, what a big bear.
I keep a 12ga pump with slug, 00, slug, 00, slug, nearby just incase my alive bear rug comes in for a snack..
Last edited by BigBill; 05-10-2014 at 06:06 PM.
|
05-10-2014, 06:08 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
These older revolver calibers will be around forever. Even the 44 Russian is here to stay.
|
05-10-2014, 06:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 6
Liked 5,315 Times in 1,937 Posts
|
|
Oh Boy! Another caliber war!!!
|
05-10-2014, 06:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 8,671
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,342 Posts
|
|
My 586 is X ring shooting double action at 25 yds with my personal favorite 125gr JHP hand loads. If that is obsolete I will take it but put it up against any handgun cartridge anytime.
.357 is a great cartridge.
Jim
|
05-10-2014, 07:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 3
Liked 37 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
The best !!
If I could have only one handgun it would be my model 65 3inch, it will do anything a reasonable person could ask, will shoot .357, .38 special. snake shot and easy to carry and mentioned above if you cannot handle a situation with six rounds of .357, man or animal , I would advise you to spend more range time or stay at home !
|
05-10-2014, 07:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 266
Liked 931 Times in 440 Posts
|
|
I'm kinda partial to my 586-3 6 inch.
|
05-10-2014, 08:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 285
Likes: 117
Liked 128 Times in 78 Posts
|
|
Anytime I hear the (fill in the blank) is obsolete, my answer is "stand in front of one while I shoot it at you."
No one has ever taken up that challenge.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-10-2014, 08:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 10,425
Liked 28,230 Times in 5,272 Posts
|
|
Everybody sez I'm obsolete too. I reckon I'll take my 7 .357s somewhere and sulk.
__________________
Eccentric old coot
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-10-2014, 10:41 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy
Everybody sez I'm obsolete too. I reckon I'll take my 7 .357s somewhere and sulk.
|
Hell, I was born obsolete. Doesn't bother me. They know the drill if they can't take a joke.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
05-10-2014, 11:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 36
Likes: 1
Liked 15 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
There is an article by Greg Ellifritz Equipment or Caliber and he found it very stron in comparison to other handgun rounds. The 44mag wasn't listed.
|
05-11-2014, 11:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 619
Likes: 8
Liked 286 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Obsolete? Balderdash! It's arguably the most versatile handgun cartridge extant. Handloading makes it even more versatile. It has a high fun factor as well if one is into light bullet/slow powder maximum flasho-blasto loads! A few years ago, I made up a few of those just for what turned out to be an annoyance factor. 125 grainers in front of W296 in a 4-inch 686. The indoor range at which I was shooting had nothing in the way of sound baffles, some of the other shooters began to cry, and I was asked to leave. I said OK as long as you waive the range fee or charge me for no more than ten minutes. No, I am not buying any of your lead reloads, sorry. This is what I came to shoot. Fortunately for me, they saw it my way. I did pay for the target and backer. Haven't been back. Speaking of obsolete, there's this neat top-break in .44 Russian................ .
|
05-11-2014, 12:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver USA
Posts: 322
Likes: 636
Liked 203 Times in 106 Posts
|
|
Funny to see this post resurrected.
A recent Handloader/Rifle article by (IMHO) a very respected Alaska guide says that both he and his daughter use .357 revolvers as backup. I forget the load/bullet, but what struck me was that he didn't advocate the various larger cartridges.
And these folks hunt really, really big bears. Really big.
And I agree with those of you lovin' the 4" L-frame (and, to be fair, those from Ruger). A handier, more versatile....and reliable....handgun cannot be found.
|
05-11-2014, 12:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4,558
Liked 2,141 Times in 770 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayFramer
Over 4 years later, and the .357 magnum is STILL not obsolete!
Imagine that!
|
Well, you went and done it, Dr. Frankenstein! It Lives! (considering this was originally started in Jan. 2010!)
Anyone feeling that there's no room for a .357 Magnum caliber gun in their collection, and those who like the .357 as well, ought to read this. Like this thread, kind of old but still relevant:
My Friend, The .357
I'll never be without one, that's for sure!
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Last edited by 2hawk; 05-11-2014 at 01:22 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-11-2014, 02:10 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wisconsin Central State
Posts: 971
Likes: 3,197
Liked 800 Times in 351 Posts
|
|
Back in 1970 or so I recall the cry of: the .45 colt is doomed.
Well it is still kicking just as the .38 special and .357 Magnum. The good ole .41 mag still hangs on also. M-58 / M-57 having great records in both hunting and defense with PROPER loads.
I must admit I shoot .38 specials more than magnums in my .357
My first center fire handgun was a M-28 S&W 4 inch which I still have along with my K/L frames.
There is not much you can ask of the 38/357 that it can not do well. If you need more power grab a long gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-11-2014, 04:56 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SE USA
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 4,481
Liked 1,926 Times in 872 Posts
|
|
After back surgery, I really like it when leaving the shooting range even more. Target usually sports a large hole in it. People around you watch round after round hit the dirt at 100 yards in the same place. Clean up the spent brass while sitting at the table. Don't need a broom. I can even shoot .38 if I want in it, which is most of the time all that is needed with a well-placed shot. Military and Police used the .38 for many moons, so why argue about the .357 Magnum? Carrying your shotgun and rifle in the window of your pickup, with a pistol hiding somewhere, may be going obsolete; but not the .357 Magnum.
Last edited by YeshuaIsa53; 05-11-2014 at 05:25 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Occupied Colorado
Posts: 609
Likes: 384
Liked 660 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FHBrumb
Instead of calling it obsolete, I'd call it versatile. Possibly the most versatile revolver/ammo type yet.
From poppers barely strong enough to get through paper targets to 200 grain hardcast shooting through-and-through on whitetails, it can do loads of things. There's lots available for reloaders and tons of factory ammo as well.
|
Agreed. Also does not meet the definition of obsolete:
ob•so•lete (ˌɒb səˈlit, ˈɒb səˌlit)
adj., v. -let•ed, -let•ing. adj.
1. no longer in general use.
Plenty of .357 guns still in general use, from revolvers to lever action carbines. Seems they are still so popular that wallyworld and LGS have problems keeping .357 Magnum ammo in stock.
2. of a discarded or outmoded type: an obsolete battleship.
See above. Plenty of people looking to acquire them and many who own quality .357's holding on to them.
3. (of a linguistic form) no longer in use, esp., out of use for at least the past century: used in this dictionary to indicate that a word has not been in widespread use since c1750. Abbr.: Obs.
Probably over a million still in use.
4. rudimentary in comparison with the corresponding part or trait in related species or in individuals of the opposite sex.
v.t.
5. to make obsolete; antiquate.
[1570–80; < Latin obsolētus, past participle of obsolēscere to fall into disuse, perhaps =ob- ob-sol(ēre) to be accustomed to + -ēscere -esce]
ob`so•lete′ly, adv.
ob`so•lete′ness, n.
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary.
|
05-11-2014, 10:41 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
So to sum up, could we say the claim the .357 Magnum is obsolete is basically a load of pasture pancakes?
Just asking.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-17-2014, 05:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 648
Likes: 598
Liked 879 Times in 293 Posts
|
|
Fresh! With syrup! :-)
Bob
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
05-19-2015, 03:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan Bob
I love hi-cap's, one can miss fast and often! Sure the odd exception occur's now and again, but if a trained shooter cannot solve the problem with six round's, it wont get solved with seventeen. The 125gr JHP in .357 is the round that is the standard for one shot stop's. They dident call it the lightning bolt for nothing!
|
A trained shooter cannot stop 7 threats with 6 rounds, wear the wrong color while making a wrong turn in south central L.A. and you'll wish for hi cap support.
|
05-19-2015, 03:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 1,105
Liked 5,152 Times in 1,580 Posts
|
|
That settles it. My thirteen 357's are now for sale.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-19-2015, 03:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 2,809
Liked 5,794 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aterry33
Someone argued this point to me the other day.
The argument was that if you were looking for a woods gun or something to defend against predators, the .44 magnum is a better choice, whether it's a S&W 29, Ruger Redhawk, etc. If the recoil of the 44 is too much for some shooters, they can use downloaded rounds that are manageable but still more effective than the .357.
If you are looking for defense against humans, rounds like the .40 S&W and .45ACP are better, because they have plenty of knockdown power without the recoil, flash, or muzzle blast of the .357 magnum. This is not a revolver vs. semiauto thread, but a Glock 22 will hold 16 rounds vs. 6 rounds of .357 in a S&W 686 and still only weighs a little over half as much as the 686.
What do you think? I am not saying that I agree with this argument, and I will always be fond of the .357 magnum, but I find myself perhaps agreeing to an extent. If I am in the woods I take my .44, which I can load with anything from light to hot 44 specials up to magnums. For civilian (or even LEO) self-defense, I don't feel like the .357 magnum does anything that the .40 S&W can't do, with less recoil, blast and noise. You could argue that the 45ACP does not have enough penetration, or that the 9mm doesn't have enough power, but the 40 seems to do well enough.
|
The fact that the individual used "knock down power" in regards to a handgun caliber tell me he has no clue what he is taking about.
|
05-19-2015, 04:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 267
Likes: 436
Liked 151 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
The 357 Mag. Is tops for versatility. Light .38 special wadcutter loads, +p .38 special and Magnum loads in .357. There is an abundance of revolvers in both single and double action. If I had only one center fire revolver make it a .357 Mag.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-19-2015, 06:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 157
Likes: 312
Liked 86 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
The .357 is never gonna be "obsolete", but maybe this thread oughta be...or is. 2010-2015 R.I.P.
|
05-19-2015, 06:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 909
Likes: 135
Liked 1,044 Times in 450 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostintheOzone
If a company like Ruger would team up with Federal and build a rimless 357 so it could be used in a carbine like an M1 or M4 it would be very popular.
|
I researched the Winchester 351WSL and thought that with a little modification it could be converted to shoot the 357. Not sure if it would be possible but, they are almost identical.
I would love to see a semi-auto 357 rifle.
Last edited by IAM Rand; 05-19-2015 at 07:00 PM.
|
05-19-2015, 07:13 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
When a writer for one of the gun rags can't think of anything else, they pick a popular cartridge and say it is obsolete. Today it's the .357 Mag, tomorrow the .30-06.
|
Col. Chas. Askins told me that he did that very thing. He knew that angry readers write to editors, proving that his material was being read. He was dead serious, too.
Actually, I think he did write that the .30/06 was obsolete.
This very day, I got an Online magazine with a feature saying that the stainless .357 with four-inch barrel is the ideal survival handgun. I tend to agree.
I think you'll get enough responses here to let you know that your thread was noticed.
Last edited by Texas Star; 05-19-2015 at 07:18 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-19-2015, 07:55 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2hawk
Well, you went and done it, Dr. Frankenstein! It Lives! (considering this was originally started in Jan. 2010!)
Anyone feeling that there's no room for a .357 Magnum caliber gun in their collection, and those who like the .357 as well, ought to read this. Like this thread, kind of old but still relevant:
My Friend, The .357
I'll never be without one, that's for sure!
|
I read the linked article again, and liked it once more. Skeeter had a way of saying how he felt that kept the reader both informed and entertained. I hope that I did the same in the app. 5,000 articles that I've published, many about guns. Skeeter was one of my mentors.
Gun writers are not usually known for literary ability, but he could connect very well with the average reader of those magazines. John Wootters was a better wordsmith, and he also liked the .357.
Thanks for the chance to read that story again. Yes, I saw where it needed some typos corrected. But the meaning was always clear, and the reasoning lucid, with ample experience stated.
The only thing that needs to be added is to mention some of the best modern factory loads and to update the handloads. That story dates from the mid-1960's and the half jacketed bullets referred to have been replaced in the manufacturers' lines by modern JSP and JHP versions.
A local detective had access to shootings by police in this area using Winchester's 145 grain Silvertip ammo. He said they almost represented overkill. With that in mind, I've avoided using the hot 125 grain bullets that cause accelerated wear on guns, esp. the smaller .357's.
The .357 cartridge is also one of my best friends. Skelton moved in good company when he said that.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-19-2015, 11:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
Posts: 10,183
Likes: 7,175
Liked 14,373 Times in 5,411 Posts
|
|
I take it that he did not volunteer to be a target of this "obsolete" round?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2015, 12:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado (unfortunately)
Posts: 379
Likes: 731
Liked 222 Times in 128 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Last Standing Knight
Fact: 357 revolvers are the most versitile (sic) weapons out there...can handle everything from 38 short Colt, shotshells, all the way up to armor piercing 357 rounds.
Fact: 357's can be had in everything from J frame Smiths up to something that can only be mounted in the back bed of a large pickup (so to speak)
Without getting into the semiauto/revolver feud, most defensive situtations occur in just a few feet with only a few rounds fired. A 357 (and even 38+P) with proper loads are a sure stopper.
I often carry a Charter Arms (1980's) Tracker 357 snubby during road trips and on hikes in the woods and have complete confidence in it. A "survival" gun, if you will. Today, I will be packing my M28-2 4". (loaded with Remington 158 SJHP's)
As far as obsolete, I think if it ever came down to it, the 357 Magnum would probably be around long, long after the others have fallen.
No, it's not going to stop everything (what does?) but what it does it does very very well and has done so since 1935.
|
Agreed. It is my favorite round powerful,controllable , available and versatile...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2015, 12:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Posts: 183
Likes: 57
Liked 201 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Lol I love when someone calls .357 obsolete and pushes a .40. The .40 imo is the most not needed caliber around.
At least the .357 mag can be loaded in many bullet configurations and packages.
Plus .44mag ammo is very expensive.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2015, 02:07 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,494
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,597 Times in 3,228 Posts
|
|
The .357 is not my favorite round, but of all the revolvers I own the only caliber I have more of is the .44 Special....
Man, am I an old timer? ...
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2015, 06:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
Who come up with this type of argument? A .357 is more than enough for anything in North America short of a brown or grizzly bear. I have taken several deer, and with .38's in the same gun rabbits,turkey,squirrels etc.
I think the springs and plastic crowd believe in "if you can't shoot well, shoot often". Never ceases to amaze me when I go to the range with my "obsolete" wheel guns the looks I get when I start sitting up my gong targets at 75 or 100 yards, and then start making them ring like a bell.
A few guys will wonder over and ask, what are you shooting, and how do you do that? Have won a few bets with the spray and pray crowd after a friendly wager about the auto's ability to shoot at long ranges. made a few converts along the way. Long live the .357, if I was told I could only have 1 handgun it would have to be a .357,nothing beats its versatility. long live the .357, Thanks Skeeter for the wisdom of your writings years ago.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-20-2015, 04:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Posts: 183
Likes: 57
Liked 201 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Good Ol' Hickok never lets me down.
Even he says at around 11 min into vid that if he had to give up all his glocks, guns etc and just had that little .357 mag he'd be very well off and protected. YOu can't say that about a lot of other calibers.
Last edited by RubenZ; 05-20-2015 at 04:51 PM.
|
05-20-2015, 04:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,890
Likes: 6,992
Liked 28,122 Times in 8,914 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markcuda
I better give away all my .357s then
|
I'll pm my shipping address.
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
05-20-2015, 05:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,890
Likes: 6,992
Liked 28,122 Times in 8,914 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim@DOA
A trained shooter cannot stop 7 threats with 6 rounds, wear the wrong color while making a wrong turn in south central L.A. and you'll wish for hi cap support.
|
Let me just say that if 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 don't understand what happened to 1 and 2 and run away in your scenario, then they ought to be pretty easy to deal with . . .
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 357 magnum, 44 magnum, 45acp, 686, beretta, browning, carbine, cartridge, colt, glock, k frame, krag, model 14, model 66, redhawk, ruger, savage, sig arms, trooper, vaquero, winchester, wwii |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|