Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2011, 11:50 AM
Helderberg Helderberg is offline
US Veteran
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rolesville NC
Posts: 574
Likes: 1,800
Liked 465 Times in 148 Posts
Default .380 HP

I am asking if the use of HP ammo in a short barreled auto, a S&W Bodygaurd, makes any sense. Reason I ask is the expansion from a handgun like this is at best spotty and penetration limited. If you need to shoot and the BG has a heavy coat would a FMJ make more of an impact? I have no idea if my logic makes any sense but the only reason I see for a HP in my .380 is for the jury and prosecuting attorney making a case for not worrying about my neighbors. I don't know what is the best but would appreciate any information you could throw my way.
Best, Frank.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2011, 12:09 PM
OKFC05 OKFC05 is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,160
Likes: 3,620
Liked 5,205 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

No definitive answer to this one.
I use Gold dots in everything for carry, mostly because the typical HP in .380 will clog and not expand given any chance to do so, and the gold dots are better than most.

The other school of though is why not use FMJ for better penetration and low cost.

Frankly, I quit carrying .380 as a primary gun after some bad experiences shooting animals with little immediate effect. 9mm/.38spl is as low as I go for primary carry now, particularly with guns like the compact Kahr 9mm available.

If I have to deal with another large vicious dog, I'd prefer a shotgun over any handgun to keep from getting bitten, and intend to shoot it ASAP instead of just trying to get it off my property.
__________________
Science plus Art
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2011, 12:26 PM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

I don't go for slow moving low mass HP bullets in small calibers. In 200+ grains bullets that is subjective. I'm going to be casting these for my Bersa Thunder .380 soon and I think they will be pretty good.

TL358-100-RF Ranch Dog's TL358-100-RF [TL358100RF] - $60.00 : Ranch Dog Outdoors, Ranch Dog Outdoors - Lee Special Order Bullet Molds for Leverguns and semi-auto Handguns
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2011, 12:51 PM
roker roker is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Federal HS 90gr penetrates 9.4" while 90gr FMJ will penetrate 10.9" I would rather go with the Hydroshok myself. You can also check out Handloads.com for different bullet types & weights. Also includes actual shootings & one shot stops with different bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-26-2011, 12:58 PM
Wirbech Wirbech is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

You might want to check out the new Hornady FTX Critical Defense .380 90-Grain rounds. If you go to Hornady's web site they have a vid that explains the FTX technology. But then again, almost any of the newer HP defense rounds will be better than a FMJ. The FMJ rounds will most likely give you the through and through shot, not a hit that will stop the attacker. I use them in my 9mm for my everyday carry load.

John

Last edited by Wirbech; 08-26-2011 at 01:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-26-2011, 01:47 PM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
ArchAngelCD ArchAngelCD is offline
Moderator
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
Default

I have several friends who carry a 380 when they need to carry something very small. They all have switched over to Hornady Critical Defense ammo because of the polymer tipped bullet. They seem to expand well no matter what barriers are presented.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2011, 09:19 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,218 Times in 3,013 Posts
Default

When I carry one of my 380s it is loaded with FMJ. Penetration and
bullet placement are what counts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2011, 11:02 AM
mkk41 mkk41 is offline
Banned
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
Default

I've always thought that bullets were designed to make cool looking mushrooms when shot from a perfectly square angle into wet newspaper or ballistics gel under controlled labratory conditions. Both are fairly consistant in hardness/toughness. The human body isn't. Ya got muscle , bones , cartlidge , fat/flab , organs and clothing. Plus I doubt a self defense scenerio will rarely present a truly square shot.
Modern bullets like the Hornady XTP and Speer Gold Dot are impressive in gel and newspaper.

My .380s will stay loaded with Glasers. Proven track record against bad guys. My second mag (if needed) is loaded with ball for penetration to the vital organs.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-20-2011, 06:25 PM
offensive's Avatar
offensive offensive is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: KS
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
Liked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Default

On my BG380(my summertime carry gun,as it it easier to conceal in shorts and a t-shirt) I have them staggered. Corbon powerball then Gold Dot then Powerball. I have taken it to the range to make sure I did not have any feed problems doing it and it shot just fine through a box of each.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-20-2011, 07:19 PM
S&W forever's Avatar
S&W forever S&W forever is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 348
Likes: 10
Liked 60 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Speer Gold Dot to me work the best in my Bodyguard
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-20-2011, 08:38 PM
gunlovingirl's Avatar
gunlovingirl gunlovingirl is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 6,305
Likes: 922
Liked 870 Times in 256 Posts
Default

I carry Corbon DPX in my BG380.
__________________
Misty
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-20-2011, 09:50 PM
Mike, SC Hunter Mike, SC Hunter is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,900
Likes: 14,032
Liked 13,740 Times in 4,979 Posts
Default

FMJ's in thw wifes's LCR.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2011, 09:27 PM
30-30remchester 30-30remchester is online now
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountains of Colorado
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,428
Liked 6,630 Times in 1,832 Posts
Default

I have actually used a Ruger LCP to shoot resently killed antelope and deer. Within 1 minute of death the antelope were shot with either Cor-Bon DPX or Remington Golder Sabre. The shots were taken at extreme angles entering at last rib and angled for off shoulder. The DPX'S gave more penatration and both brands showed excellent mushrooms. A mule deer buck was shot broadside in the lungs at 5'. The deer was wearing his heavy winter coat. I used the DPX'S for 2 shots. Both rounds blew through both sides and exited.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2011, 10:03 PM
TACC1 TACC1 is offline
US Veteran
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wautoma, WI 54982
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 6,564
Liked 799 Times in 499 Posts
Default

30-30,
I guess that's about as clinical a test as you could ask for. Thanks.
TACC1
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-23-2011, 07:47 AM
Mule88's Avatar
Mule88 Mule88 is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vandalia, Ohio
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 300
Liked 231 Times in 137 Posts
Default

When I carry a .380 I use to carry HP's but tests were showing minimal penetration with them. Ive since switched to Winchesters whitebox which has a flat nose bullet I feel will give better penetration and the flat nose will give a bit more damage to tissue than the round nose design.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-09-2011, 09:25 AM
John Law John Law is offline
Member
.380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP .380 HP  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I know this is not scientific but out of curiosity I wanted to see how several brands of JHP would compare when shot into gallon milk containers. The cartridges I tried were Speer Gold Dot, Hornady Critical Defense and Winchester PDX1. What I found was that the GD was not always consistent, it did not always expand. The PDX had exceptional expansion but also appeared to have the least penetration, what surprised me was that the Hornady CD was the most consistent, it always expanded although not as large as the PDX and seemed to penetrate deeper into the gallons. Penetration was only visual as to where the bullet ended up at the bottom of the gallon so it probably is not accurate.
I realize hitting the human body with any caliber can have varying effects, this info is based on only one type of media. I no longer carry 380, if I did I would probably go with the Critical Defense or a flat nose FMJ.
PDX1 Expansion .71 & .68 Penetration approx 7"
Speer Gold Dot Expansion .508 Penetration approx 8"
Hornady CD Expansion .495 & .465 Penetration approx 10"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
380, 38spl, bg380, bodyguard, hornady, kahr, polymer, remington, ruger, winchester

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)