Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:13 AM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum

I tried a keyword search first, but nothing came up, so here goes.

I just bought a 629-1, 4", and want to go easy on the gun (not worried about going easy on me). I remember 30 years ago reading about using short rds (.44 special) in long chambers, and would like to find a full-length .44 mag on the mild side.

I looked at Buffalo Bore's 'reduced recoil' loads and they clock in at 1250 fps, while Remington's original full-house 240 gr load is currently advertised at 1180 fps. Something around 950-1000 fps would be ideal, (or maybe I have my answer with that remington load). Bullet style doesn't matter. Wouldn't mind finding a LSWC, if they're loaded commercially.

To head off the re-loading question (it's coming, right?), I don't reload because when if I've had enough money for equipment, I bought a gun, but at current ammo prices, I'm open to the idea.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 07:37 AM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

I'm assuming this is for self defense against two leggers? If so Speer makes a Short Barrel 200 Gr. (IIRC) Gold Dot load and Corbon makes a managed recoil 165 gr. JHP load. I have tested the Corbon load. The results are in the Perma-Gel Test Results thread.

Unless you are rich, practicing with a .44 almost requires that you handload.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 05-29-2010, 07:55 AM
prescobd prescobd is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 458
Likes: 32
Liked 256 Times in 100 Posts
Default

I have a partial box (not for sale) of the Remington reduce velocity load (R44MG4). It was a 240 lead SWC bullet. I believe it has been discontinued for many years. Maybe Remington could be convinced to bring in back out with the newer lighter weight revolvers out there now in this caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-29-2010, 09:16 AM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

You're probably SOL and might as well get used to the idea of handloading.

Not only is it cheaper but you are more in control of your ammo supply, both as to the quantity and type.

FWIW, shooting .44 Specials, if you can find them, will not hurt your gun AT ALL.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2010, 09:58 AM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Yes, it's for two-leggeds. I'll look into the CCI load; thanks for the pointer.

I suppose I'd better join some reloading forums. I remember reading about a single round Lee loader that appealed to me. Maybe it's a pain to do them one at a time, but it sounds economical.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2010, 11:00 AM
scattershot's Avatar
scattershot scattershot is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 167
Liked 979 Times in 490 Posts
Default

At $37.00 and change for 20 rounds, if you shoot much it wouldn't take much to pay for a reloading setup. I know you didn't want to hear it, but it makes so much sense that it's hard not to recommend reloading.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2010, 12:55 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenprism View Post
I suppose I'd better join some reloading forums. I remember reading about a single round Lee loader that appealed to me. Maybe it's a pain to do them one at a time, but it sounds economical.
Try a Lee Turret Press. It can be used as a single stage if you remove the auto index rod. With the rod in you still are focusing on only one cartridge at a time, but it will be faster than a single stage and the Lee Turret Press is relatively inexpensive. Get the four hole press so that you can seat and crimp (the Lee factory crimp die absolutely rocks) in two seperate steps. That's what I use and I'm happy with it. For people who burn over 100 rds. a week, a progressive press would make more sense I would think.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 05-29-2010, 01:07 PM
pre16 pre16 is offline
SWCA Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenprism View Post
I tried a keyword search first, but nothing came up, so here goes.

I just bought a 629-1, 4", and want to go easy on the gun (not worried about going easy on me). I remember 30 years ago reading about using short rds (.44 special) in long chambers, and would like to find a full-length .44 mag on the mild side.

I looked at Buffalo Bore's 'reduced recoil' loads and they clock in at 1250 fps, while Remington's original full-house 240 gr load is currently advertised at 1180 fps. Something around 950-1000 fps would be ideal, (or maybe I have my answer with that remington load). Bullet style doesn't matter. Wouldn't mind finding a LSWC, if they're loaded commercially.

To head off the re-loading question (it's coming, right?), I don't reload because when if I've had enough money for equipment, I bought a gun, but at current ammo prices, I'm open to the idea.
The outdoormarksman.com has 240gr swc.

Last edited by pre16; 05-29-2010 at 01:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:13 PM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 37
Liked 5,429 Times in 1,761 Posts
Default

A word about the Specials-in-a-Magnum-chamber bugaboo.

I have been hearing horror stories about how this will ruin a chamber for 45 years, and the whole time I have merrily shot .22 Shorts in LR chambers, .38 Specials in .357 chambers, .44 Specials in .44 Magnum chambers, all with nary a problem. Yes, after a lot of shooting carbon and lube can build up and form a ring of gunk inside the chamber -- but it can be cleaned out with minimal fuss, as long as you don't wait years and thousands of rounds between cleanings. Buy some decent .44 Specials for your 629, clean it regularly, and quit fretting.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 05-29-2010, 05:44 PM
TSQUARED TSQUARED is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 2
Liked 114 Times in 84 Posts
Default

If you decide to reload you could produce some very mild loads using Trail Boss powder in those 44 magnum cases.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-30-2010, 12:07 PM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the advice. I'll look into the Lee Turret (and outdoormarksman, thanks!). I like hobbies, and reloading sounds like a good combination of detailed work and rewarding outcome. I've been looking at powders, brass, and bullets, and I'm sure I can do better than $26 - 36 for 20 rds of anything.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-30-2010, 07:05 PM
enidpd804 enidpd804 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 31
Liked 39 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Corbon makes a 165 gr. Sierra JHP load listed at 1300 fps. You can watch high speed gello shooting video on their website.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-30-2010, 10:47 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Thumbs up Cool Stuff!

enidpd, thanks for the heads up on the video!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-31-2010, 10:10 AM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

1300 fps? Most of the suggestions here make the classic Remington 240 gr load (listed at 1180 fps) look tame. What exactly is the velocity of the original .44 magnum...?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-31-2010, 10:36 AM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

240 gr @ 1400 fps
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-31-2010, 11:16 AM
augy's Avatar
augy augy is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
Likes: 25
Liked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenprism View Post
Yes, it's for two-leggeds. I'll look into the CCI load; thanks for the pointer.

I suppose I'd better join some reloading forums. I remember reading about a single round Lee loader that appealed to me. Maybe it's a pain to do them one at a time, but it sounds economical.
If its for two-leggeds, you don't want to use re-loads for legal reasons.
Use only factory ammo.

To practice with, get a Lyman reloading manual (Newest is Lyman 48th Edition) and lookup .44 magnum loads.
To start with, use a 200 ~ 210 grain jacketed bullet with the minimum powder charge listed for a .44 magnum case.
It will be easy on the gun and fun to shoot.
As you get used to it, you can work up to a little hotter loads.
Good luck.
Jim in Tennessee

Last edited by augy; 05-31-2010 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-31-2010, 12:37 PM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Thanks Jim. Any bullet recommendations?

I used to read that a bullet had to move out at 1000 fps minimum to reliably expand. I'm sure bullet design has improved in 30 years. On the oteh rhand, a .44 caliber hole is a big hole, and the SWC seems pretty effective. You need a gas check over 1000 fps, right?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-31-2010, 12:47 PM
augy's Avatar
augy augy is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
Likes: 25
Liked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenprism View Post
Thanks Jim. Any bullet recommendations?

I used to read that a bullet had to move out at 1000 fps minimum to reliably expand. I'm sure bullet design has improved in 30 years. On the oteh rhand, a .44 caliber hole is a big hole, and the SWC seems pretty effective. You need a gas check over 1000 fps, right?
I shoot Speer 200 grain JHP in front of 10.5 grains of Unique in a .44 magnum brass case.
Also, Speer 210 Gold Dot JHP in front of 10.3 grains of Unique in a .44 magnum brass case.

Not sure what the fps is.

Both of these are fun loads and real easy on the gun.
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-31-2010, 12:48 PM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

You don't need expansion if you use a .44.

Nor do you need factory ammo. There are legions of us who do not use factory ammo, whether for sporting or defensive purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-31-2010, 01:13 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cp1969 View Post
You don't need expansion if you use a .44.
While expansion may or not be a necessity, it most certainly is very desireable. It will transfer more energy to the shootee, and minimize the possibility of pass throughs. I'm a firm believer that mid power .44 magnums have enough energy that it can be a factor in stopping someone. Note that the best street loads in several calibers generally stop in 12"-14" of gelatin.
Quote:
Nor do you need factory ammo. There are legions of us who do not use factory ammo, whether for sporting or defensive purposes.
I agree. I'm tired of the overpriced **** with QC issues that the factories are spewing out. At some point I will be using handloads in all calibers except my .22s.

As far as the Corbon 165 gr. JHP is concerned, I clocked a single round out of my 5" 629 at 1250 fps. and have found that it's very mild to shoot. I've loaded that same bullet up to 1656 fps. and it's quite different when pushed that fast.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-31-2010, 01:42 PM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

flop-shank, I'm one who hasn't yet bought into the 'energy transfer' theory and when you don't buy into that, the whole bullet expansion thing kind of seems like a side issue. Knives and arrows transfer very little energy but have caused a lot of fatal wounds. Someone pointed out recently that a hot bath transfers more energy to you than a knife, but very little damage.

Stating the very obvious here, but bullets kill by damaging vital stuff inside. Some of that can be located on the far side of the target. I don't want a bullet stopping short of that--I want it to go all the way through. Doesn't matter to me if it still had kinetic energy to spare after accomplishing that.

Now I might whistle a different tune if I had to shoot someone with a loved one standing right behind them, but I don't. In fact, I don't even keep a loaded gun in the house and to date all of my shooting has consisted of hunting and plinking. Shooting people has never been a concern or a very likely thing to happen as I don't carry a gun, either. But in hunting, I definitely do not want the bullet stopping inside. It makes tracking too difficult.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 05-31-2010, 05:23 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cp1969 View Post
flop-shank, I'm one who hasn't yet bought into the 'energy transfer' theory and when you don't buy into that, the whole bullet expansion thing kind of seems like a side issue.
Go to Youtube and watch Kennedy's head blow apart. Grizzly yes, but tissue torn that the bullet never touched. Yes, I know that was a rifle and we're talking handguns here. However, I run a screaming hot handload in my .44 mag. and I've shot a woodchuck through the head (which disintegrated) and two others through the body (the first one had a 5" tear for an exit wound and it's stomach, spleen and a large part of it's colon were blown out of the exit wound) and saw serious tissue damage that was done by energy. There was damaged tissue that the bullet never touched. So it stands to reason that as cartridges become more powerful, even from handguns, there's a greater likelyhood that their energy will play a part in stopping power. At the same time, I'm not saying that shot placement isn't paramount. It most certainly is.

In a podcast at Proarms Podcast , Keith Jones, a veteran cop who has used gunfire to win four deadly force encounters, talks about how when his agency switched from .38+P to .357 magnum they had to shoot perps fewer times to get them to cease their hostilities, yet more of those shot with the .357 survived their wounds to be stood in front of a judge. Obviously something more than tissue damage was at play.
Quote:
Knives and arrows transfer very little energy but have caused a lot of fatal wounds.
That's because they poke holes. The ability to stop and the ability to kill are two different things. On the flip side Mike Tyson's fist ha s locked a lot of people up and layed them out flat on the canvas without any penetration whatsoever. If energy wasn't causing the stop, what was?
Quote:
Someone pointed out recently that a hot bath transfers more energy to you than a knife, but very little damage.
I don't mean to be rude, but give me a break.
Quote:
Stating the very obvious here, but bullets kill by damaging vital stuff inside. Some of that can be located on the far side of the target. I don't want a bullet stopping short of that--I want it to go all the way through.
Generally 12"-14" penetration will reach the vital stuff.
Quote:
Now I might whistle a different tune if I had to shoot someone with a loved one standing right behind them, but I don't.
I can't forsee the future and I'm very concerned about the innocent family that might be standing behind a perp in a gas station, or on a sidewalk.
Quote:
In fact, I don't even keep a loaded gun in the house and to date all of my shooting has consisted of hunting and plinking. Shooting people has never been a concern or a very likely thing to happen as I don't carry a gun, either. But in hunting, I definitely do not want the bullet stopping inside. It makes tracking too difficult.
Shooting to kill a game animal and shooting to stop a violent criminal are two different things and require different bullet performance. Your thinking is spot on for hunting. If I were hunting, I would look no further than the tried and proven SWC.

Last edited by flop-shank; 05-31-2010 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-01-2010, 07:53 PM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Well... until I get set up for reloading, I'll carry the Remington 240 @ 1180 fps. It's one of the widest hollow points I've ever seen -- like the Speer flying ashtray. I like the scalloped jacket and soft lead too.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-01-2010, 09:19 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

bp, do a search, if you haven't, and check out the thread Perma-Gel Test Results here in the ammo forum. I've tested the Remington 240 gr. SJHP. I think you'll find it interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-01-2010, 10:04 PM
millbilly millbilly is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 201
Likes: 17
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I shoot a lot of remington 180 grain JSP.....seems to shoot very well and the last deer i shot with it fell in a pile.....
__________________
millbilly
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-04-2010, 04:59 PM
ExplorerOne ExplorerOne is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I carry a 44 Special revolver when I carry a revolver, have do hesitation about the ammo. Just find a decent hollow point. The larger hole (over a 38) gives you a head start IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-04-2010, 06:38 PM
flop-shank flop-shank is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by millbilly View Post
I shoot a lot of remington 180 grain JSP.....seems to shoot very well and the last deer i shot with it fell in a pile.....
That's a nuts hot load! It really impressed me when I shot it.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-16-2010, 09:28 AM
robocop10mm robocop10mm is offline
Absent Comrade
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Pro Load made a 200 Gr "Tactical Lite" load with the Speer Gold Dot bullet at 1000fps. It shoots pretty sweet.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:10 PM
44forever 44forever is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default Georgia Arms, I believe,

offers a 240 grain lead SWC at about 1100 fps. They shoot well and are very controlable with practice, decent prices too.
__________________
Big bang, much smash'em.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-16-2010, 12:27 PM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
Pro Load made a 200 Gr "Tactical Lite" load with the Speer Gold Dot bullet at 1000fps. It shoots pretty sweet.
"Made"? I see Pro-Load doesn't offer this any more.

I think the Speer 200 gr short barrel magnum load is probably the equivalent of what you mentioned.

Last edited by brokenprism; 06-16-2010 at 01:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-16-2010, 01:37 PM
robocop10mm robocop10mm is offline
Absent Comrade
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have not been able to get anything from Pro Load lately. I bought a few boxes of the Tactical Lite load several years ago. I still have 40 rounds. Talk about gaping hollow point!!!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-30-2015, 10:30 AM
notch notch is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 9
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Do a search on Elmer Kieth and his experiances with the "44Mag"
I have a Ruger 44carbine and recently a Ruger RedHawk 7 1/2 inch barrel I bought because I really can't use the lead reloads in the carbine very well. Can't wait to set the Ruger RH with a crono.
Notch
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-30-2015, 10:57 AM
fixitfred fixitfred is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA
Posts: 149
Likes: 70
Liked 123 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenprism View Post
Thanks for all the advice. I'll look into the Lee Turret (and outdoormarksman, thanks!). I like hobbies, and reloading sounds like a good combination of detailed work and rewarding outcome. I've been looking at powders, brass, and bullets, and I'm sure I can do better than $26 - 36 for 20 rds of anything.
It sounds like you may have talked yourself into reloading. Once you make the decision the rest is easy, well not really but you know what I mean. Everybody and their brother will have a different opinion on equipment. My brother gave me a Rock Chucker to replace my lost Rock Chucker but I recomend a Dillon BL 550. They run ads in the American Hunter next to the viagra ads. It runs about $250 and if you get it I'm sure in time you will agree it's the best twofitty you ever spent. It's a solid quality machine and upgradable to an RL 550b full progressive.

Especially with 44 mag ammo you will recoup your cost in no time. Factory will run you about a buck a round. Let's break down cost aside from the equipment.

Brass (reusable) and initial cost somewhere 10¢ to 50¢ a piece.

Primers run about 3¢ a piece

Bullets vary but I use Hi-Tek coated bayou about 11¢ I have some jacketed I think I paid 20¢

The powder varies by load but 10¢ is a conservative est.

Using the brass about 10x means you pay less than 30¢ a round customized to your specifications and needs.

Once you zero in on what you like and hard core shopping and buying in bulk and you will wonder why you didn't start reloading sooner.

Last edited by fixitfred; 06-30-2015 at 11:03 AM. Reason: typos where do they come from
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-30-2015, 11:30 AM
chaparrito chaparrito is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 5 generations in N. AZ
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 1,942
Liked 3,434 Times in 1,364 Posts
Default

I doubt very much I have over 400 bucks invested in my Lee turret press including dies for .44, .45ACP and 9mm. It paid for itself in less than a year. I only recently (~a year ago) started loading for my 6 inch 629-1. It's for fun only, targets and plinking. I doubt I'll ever hunt with it or carry it. I initially thought of loading .44spec's but didn't want to mess with the carbon ring they'd cause in the cylinder. A gunsmith shooting pal gave me a half dozen of his reloads one day and said "try these". They're essentially .44 spec loads in magnum brass and are a dream to shoot. I can shoot a hundred of them painlessly. It's a 200gn round nose flat point lead bullet I buy from a local caster over 9 grains of Unique powder. I don't know what the FPS is and don't care. They go where I point them and are pretty clean. I am looking at scopes for the gun now and thinking about longer distance targets so I'm pretty sure I'll eventually have to start experimenting with better loads, but for now this one is a sweetie.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-30-2015, 12:44 PM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 7,475
Liked 8,124 Times in 3,675 Posts
Default

Shooting 44 specials in a 44 magnum will not hurt a darn thing if you want light loads.
Same goes for 38 specials in a 357 magnum. I've been doing it since 1967 in a Ruger Blackhawk. Cleaning the gun takes care of any residue.
Don't believe the "horror stories" you read on the net......some folks like to talk about things they have no real knowledge of and experience with.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-30-2015, 12:56 PM
Pointblank2U's Avatar
Pointblank2U Pointblank2U is offline
US Veteran
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 641
Likes: 51
Liked 1,177 Times in 318 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
A word about the Specials-in-a-Magnum-chamber bugaboo.

I have been hearing horror stories about how this will ruin a chamber for 45 years, and the whole time I have merrily shot .22 Shorts in LR chambers, .38 Specials in .357 chambers, .44 Specials in .44 Magnum chambers, all with nary a problem. Yes, after a lot of shooting carbon and lube can build up and form a ring of gunk inside the chamber -- but it can be cleaned out with minimal fuss, as long as you don't wait years and thousands of rounds between cleanings. Buy some decent .44 Specials for your 629, clean it regularly, and quit fretting.
Good advice. That's what I do. I use hot .44 Specials.
__________________
Loyalty Above All.. but Honor
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #37  
Old 06-30-2015, 03:13 PM
Kid44 Kid44 is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Liked 741 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
A word about the Specials-in-a-Magnum-chamber bugaboo.

I have been hearing horror stories about how this will ruin a chamber for 45 years, and the whole time I have merrily shot .22 Shorts in LR chambers, .38 Specials in .357 chambers, .44 Specials in .44 Magnum chambers, all with nary a problem. Yes, after a lot of shooting carbon and lube can build up and form a ring of gunk inside the chamber -- but it can be cleaned out with minimal fuss, as long as you don't wait years and thousands of rounds between cleanings. Buy some decent .44 Specials for your 629, clean it regularly,
and quit fretting.
Yes, no fretters allowed here.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-01-2015, 12:57 AM
old 1911 fan old 1911 fan is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 171
Likes: 800
Liked 151 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Go ahead and start with a lee Loader. Many of us did! A lead bullet at 900 fps in your .44 will work for a lot. And cheap too. Don't worry about expansion. A .44 goes in at what you hope your .30 cal. will expand too!

old 1911 fan
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-01-2015, 02:02 AM
2hawk's Avatar
2hawk 2hawk is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4,558
Liked 2,141 Times in 770 Posts
Default

Anyone notice this thread is 5 years old?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-01-2015, 09:19 AM
fixitfred fixitfred is offline
Member
Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum Reduced Recoil .44 Magnum  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA
Posts: 149
Likes: 70
Liked 123 Times in 56 Posts
Default Some Things Are Timeless

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2hawk View Post
Anyone notice this thread is 5 years old?
Yea I just did.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, 44 magnum, 629, cartridge, crimp, remington, tactical

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buffalo Bore 255 gr. Reduced Recoil Kid44 Ammo 1 11-25-2015 05:58 PM
M&P reduced recoil springs Tanners Owner Smith & Wesson Competitive Shooting 6 02-06-2015 11:11 PM
reduced recoil spring for reduced loads quiknot Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 1 10-05-2014 12:36 PM
44 Magnum reduced to 38 special recoil-Comments needed haris1 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 18 03-17-2013 10:44 AM
Reduced recoil? Finn McCool Ammo 8 11-18-2011 02:57 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)