|
|
07-26-2010, 08:43 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 8,743
Liked 1,813 Times in 797 Posts
|
|
357-Maf 158gr ??
Has anyone had any experience with Hornady 158gr HP/XTP or Remington 158 gr SJHP in 357 mag, in either handloads or factory ammo? How well, and how quickly, do they expand compared to other 158 HP bullets. Are they good personal defense bullets, or better for hunting?
|
07-26-2010, 01:48 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX, US
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 2
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
I've not tested either one, but I've tested several other XTPs, including 140 gr. .357 XTPs. Typically, XTPs have to be driven very fast to expand. Think along the lines of taking Hornady's chart for a given XTP bullet, start at the middle of their recommended velocities, and go up from there to see expansion. I view XTPs as excellent bullets for hunting and shooting bowling pins, but not so much for personal defense. In a .357, for defense against humans, I much prefer the 125gr. JHP loads. Other folks will disagree.
|
07-26-2010, 04:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
|
|
Of the 158gr .357s I've shot, only the Speer Gold Dot expanded easily enough for me to consider it a personal defense round, something like the 180gr .40 Gold Dot. Lots of penetration, but a lot of expansion, too.
|
07-26-2010, 09:40 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 38-44HD45
In a .357, for defense against humans, I much prefer the 125gr. JHP loads. Other folks will disagree.
|
Not me. The time to use loads other than 125s in .357 is when you and your gun for whatever reason shoot better with them, or to avoid K frame forcing cone issues. Don't expect better performance from other bullet weights although there are many non-125 gr. loads that will work just fine.
|
07-26-2010, 09:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
I've had best performance out of 125gr XTPs. The 158s will do the job, especially if some penetration is required, they just have to be pushed fast enough. Expect a sharp increase in recoil with a full-bore 158gr load compared to a comparable 125gr load.
Also, Hornady's chart for XTP performance as mentioned above:
Last edited by Dragon88; 07-26-2010 at 10:01 PM.
|
07-27-2010, 03:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
For defense I would choose the Remington, for hunting I would use the XTP, this opinion would be from my observation of the expansion and penetration characteristics of both of these rounds.
|
07-28-2010, 06:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 1,787
Liked 5,342 Times in 2,685 Posts
|
|
I loaded some Remington factory 125 JHPs to the 1250 fps range. Expansion tests in water proved that I should have been further away than 15 feet and that 1450 fps isn't necessary for good results. Remington used to load this as a factory round, but I guess the demand wasn't there. The performance certainly is!
I didn't have the powders available to get the 158 JHP to run fast enough to expand, but I didn't clock any of the loads.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|