Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2010, 05:43 PM
redlevel's Avatar
redlevel redlevel is offline
Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 8,050
Liked 12,731 Times in 2,419 Posts
Default Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In

Thanks to Chief38 and bmcgilvary for their work on chronographing various .38 special +p loads. Their work verified the credibility of the BB claims for velocity and energy of the ammo.
CHRONOGRAPHING 38 SPECIAL SELF DEFENSE AMMO

Some .38 Special Chronograph Tests

After reading these threads several times, I decided that I would order some of the 158 grain +p "Heavy .38 Special" loads to try in a couple of my j-frames and K-frames. I ordered up five twenty round boxes. They arrived last Friday.

On Saturday afternoon late, I took my Model 60(nd) snubby and Model 10-7 four-inch standard barrel out in the brutal heat and humidity. I set up a target stand with a piece of cardboard with a one-inch red sticky dot and fired the Model 10. All six shots were right on laterally, but all were five to seven inches high at a stepped off 45 feet. Two-hand hold, single-action, with sweat pouring off me, by the way. I was a little disappointed, because I was excited about having low-end .357 numbers from the four-inch k-frame.

Next, I tried the 2" j-frame from a paced off 12 feet. I consider that to be just about my maximum range for that gun as a personal defense weapon. Same drill, two hands, single action, six o'clock hold. I was elated when the first two shots clipped the red sticky. Actually, they were both inside the one-inch stick-on. The other three shots clustered right around the first two. I reloaded and fired five shots double-action aimed rapid fire. The group opened up, of course, but was still well within what I call combat accuracy. By now, I was literally soaked with sweat, so I called it off until Sunday afternoon.

Sunday afternoon I took a three-inch Model 36-1 and a four inch (of course) Model 15-3 and gave them a try. I first shot the Model 15 from 45 feet with some 146 grain handloads. It printed a couple of inches high. I ratcheted down the elevation adjustment pretty much, in anticipation of the high shot. Sure 'nuff, the first shot with the BB load was still about four inches high. I ratcheted down the screw some more, and tried again. The second shot was only about an inch high. A few more clicks of the screw, and the last three (I had only loaded five) shots were acceptable, although I was by this time pretty well sweated out and nearly used up. Temp was still around 94, down from a high of 99, and no telling what the humidity, as thunderstorms had been in the area, missed us, but provided plenty of moisture for the air.

I was anxious to try the 3-inch Chiefs Special, so I dried off with a towel, and sat in the truck with the air running for about five minutes. I loaded five, and fired from the 12 foot mark, just as I had with the 60. Again, the first two shots clipped the red target. I fired off the last three in rapid aimed fire, got in the truck, and headed for the house and some iced tea.

I hope to be able to do a little more testing of the ammo when the weather moderates a bit, but at a buck-fifty per shot, not too much. I was well pleased with the shoots-to-point-of-aim feature with the j-frames. After all, wasn't the load designed for snubbies? These rounds make me feel a lot better about carrying a 2" pocket pistol. 1000fps and 375 fp ain't to be sneezed at. I am assuming (yes, I know) that velocity/energy figures the manufacturer lists for the 3" SP101 will transfer to the 3" Chiefs Special. 1143fps/458 ft.lbs is moving into serious self-defense power territory. I pocket carry my Model 60, and I hope I will be able to do so with the 36-1. I really want to shoot the Model 15-3 some more, preferably from a rest at about 50 feet, to see if I want to adopt the load for that particular weapon as a truck gun and a side arm when deer hunting with a rifle or shotgun.

Recoil. Recoil was very manageable. Both the k-frame guns have PC Magnas with tyler t-grips, both square butt guns. The Model 60 has round butt magnas with a T-grip, and the 36-1 is square butt with magnas and a t-grip. If anything, I thought the j-frame guns were more comfortable to shoot. I think I must just have a j-frame style hand, because they have always felt better in my hand than any other guns, as long as there is a t-grip. The recoil with the k-frames was not nearly as punishing as a 4" Model 19 with full house .357 158 grain loads. Recoil in the snubbies was stout, but very manageable, and I'm not a recoil junkie. I was very pleasantly surprised. Fired hulls dropped out of all cylinders with little effort. I am anxious to try a cylinder full in my daughter's 442.

Conclusions: I will carry the BB load in my Model 60 regularly now, and have a whole lot more confidence in it. Same for the 36-1. I am withholding judgement on the 15-3. When it cools off a little, and I can save a little money to order a few more rounds, I'll try it again, and probably a couple more j-frames I carry some times.
__________________
Georgia On My Mind
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:28 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

Thanks. This was very interesting.

S&W's fixed sights are not set for ammo that fast, and the longer barrels burn more powder, which may account for the high hits with the four-inch guns.

Assuming that one dials it in with adjustable sights, this looks like good ammo.

I'm always leery of off brands, but BB seems to be pretty well accepted by now. It certainly delivers performance that bigger companies should be providing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:58 PM
amd6547 amd6547 is offline
Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast of Ohio
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 55 Posts
Default

I would expect faster ammo to hit lower...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:42 AM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amd6547 View Post
I would expect faster ammo to hit lower...
Yeah, at least with lighter bullets, it does. No idea what's going on here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2010, 03:04 PM
Treeman Treeman is offline
Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 392
Likes: 5
Liked 60 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Velocity has very little to do with POI at close ranges with revolvers. Bullet weight is much more relevant. The science behind that statement is related to the axis of the bore being located above the grip. The revolver barrel pivots upward upon discharge. Because faster rounds also recoil harder but exit the barrel sooner the effects of increased velocity are largely negated. Calculated difference in POI for 158 grain bullet at 800fps and same 158 at 2000fps is less than 1 inch different at 20 feet. Different WEIGHT bullets exit at differing points in the arc of rotation of the muzzle so regulating revolver sights for a particular WEIGHT is relevant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2010, 02:11 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
Default

Treeman-

Thanks! But why are his 158 grain bullets hitting so high? Fixed sights are regulated for 158 grain bullets at 15 yards, unless that's changed.

I want to try Buffalo Bore, but his results make me hesitant.
I might be able to dial-in the target-sighted guns, but the fixed-sight SP-101 is one tht I'd primarily anticipated using this ammo in.

And I don't want to be limited to that ammo by setting the sights of other guns just for it.

Has anyone else here tried BB? How does it shoot in your guns?

T-Star
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2010, 09:54 AM
stevie-ca stevie-ca is offline
Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Torrance, Ca.
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Liked 144 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Thanks for the review. I also picked up a couple boxes of this and Rem. 158gr +P to try out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:09 PM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

Good for you Redlevel!

Looks like it's time to get more Buffalo Bore ammo and check out the load's point of impact in my Model 10 4-inch.

My revolver always shot "Fedingchester" +P 158 grain ammo a inch or two lower than standard velocity. Your results of 5 to 7 inches high at 15 yards is surprising.

It is nice that you didn't consider that the J-Frame guns administered a beating with the Buffalo Bore ammo. I expected the worst from the ammo in a J-Frame so chickened out and tested it in a K-Frame.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2010, 01:55 AM
seattleM29's Avatar
seattleM29 seattleM29 is offline
Member
Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In Buffalo Bore Heavy .38 Special Sight In  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Yakima,WA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I carry that Buffalo Bore load in my Taurus 850. It is definately stout but plenty accurate at defense range. I have been pleased with it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
442, k-frame, model 10, model 15, model 19, model 60, round butt, smith-wessonforum.com, snubby, taurus

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buffalo bore heavy .38+p out of a 4 inch barrel? circa1981 Ammo 4 12-22-2012 12:10 PM
Dupicating Buffalo Bore and other's heavy .45 ACP J. W. Reloading 7 11-16-2011 10:39 PM
Buffalo Bore Heavy 30-30. Gebe The Lounge 14 10-25-2011 11:13 PM
Anyone shot heavy Buffalo Bore loads in a Model 19? aterry33 Ammo 7 09-05-2009 06:05 AM
Buffalo Bore .44 Special .455_Hunter Ammo 8 03-26-2009 10:37 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)