Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo
Forum Register Expert Commentary Members List


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2013, 01:50 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default 200 gr. .38 Special loads

Anyone remember the old 200 grain W-W .38 Spl loads? The blunt nosed bullet looked vaguely like a thumb. Definitely not for 2" bbls, I recall 572 fps in one test. Now out of print, but are there any factory equivalents today?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 02-04-2013, 02:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forum!

I believe there is an earlier thread on this- you might want to do a search. I too have been fascinated with these loads for many years, have read all the negative comments- probably true- but ALWAYS buy these 200 grainers whenever they sometimes show up at gun shows, unless ridiculously priced. Buy the Remington version also. They were written up extensively in General Hatcher's book, "Textbook of Pistols and Revolvers"- 1935.
Great nostalgia!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 02-04-2013, 05:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 848
Likes: 8
Liked 48 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
Anyone remember the old 200 grain W-W .38 Spl loads? The blunt nosed bullet looked vaguely like a thumb. Definitely not for 2" bbls, I recall 572 fps in one test. Now out of print, but are there any factory equivalents today?
I also recall that article from the Law Enforcement Handgun Digest by Grennell and Williams, ca. 1974. You are correct on the velocity from the 2" barrel. The authors also found that a point blank shot from that barrel length would not penetrate side window auto glass and would only put a shallow gouge in the body work.
__________________
אלוהים יברך ישראל
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2013, 06:43 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Liked 517 Times in 186 Posts
Default

I would have to look up my data but 600 fps out of a 2" sounds about right. I bought a couple of boxes that I chronoed for interest.
__________________
SWCA 1646
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2013, 10:02 AM
jimmyj's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 6,022
Likes: 473
Liked 3,006 Times in 1,118 Posts
Default

In my "Day" this load was called "Super Police".
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 02-05-2013, 01:54 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default

Thanks to all for your interest and the trip down 'Memory Lane!' You've read the same articles I have. Will look for a box on the collector's ammo tables at shows. Yes, jimmyj, it was called the Super Police and a 200-grainer also loaded in the shorter .38 S&W case. Supposedly a good stopper in the 1930s. VL
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 02-13-2013, 12:47 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 28
Liked 836 Times in 538 Posts
Default

Back in the Black powder days, a BIGGER bullet was BEST...........for those long kentucky rifles, and that train of thought carried over.
Many thought the 200gr lead bullet was the cream of the crop back in the day, before the invention of smokeless powders and higher velositys started to rear its ugly head.

One reason the old Colt Peacemaker was a prize for anyone that had one.......though it was a .45 cal.

High vel copper bullets did not happen til around 1935......when S&W came up with the .357 magnum.

Midway has a 200gr lead with a GC, I have not checked other dealers, since I don't think the GC is going to be needed in a revolver.

Last edited by Nevada Ed; 02-13-2013 at 12:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:16 PM
Pigirondan's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 233
Likes: 22
Liked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Blue Bunny Ammo was selling those for awhile, but have since stopped.
__________________
I believe in the wadcutter.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 185
Likes: 50
Liked 73 Times in 44 Posts
Default

The low velocity of a 200gr bullet out of a snubnose is the reason for the rounds effectiveness. Meaning, the rifling twist won't fully stabilize the long projectile so it will tumble when it hits the target. And that will hurt.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 941
Liked 803 Times in 488 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker View Post
The low velocity of a 200gr bullet out of a snubnose is the reason for the rounds effectiveness. Meaning, the rifling twist won't fully stabilize the long projectile so it will tumble when it hits the target. And that will hurt.
Interesting theories. Any experimental data to support them?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:57 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 185
Likes: 50
Liked 73 Times in 44 Posts
Default

I found that tidbit searching under 38 special in wikipedia. The load in question was the 38/200 used by the British.

"In tests performed on cadavers and live animals, it was found that the lead bullet, being overly long and heavy for its calibre, become unstable after penetrating the target, somewhat increasing target effect. The relatively low velocity allowed all of the energy of the cartridge to be spent inside the human target, rather than penetrating completely. This was deemed satisfactory and the design for the .38/200 cartridge was accepted as the "380/200 Cartridge, Revolver Mk I".

Last edited by shocker; 02-13-2013 at 02:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 18
Liked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Default

I have always heard a lot of police lore about this bullet. It was supposedly a good stopper as long as it did not have to penetrate objects such as car bodies. A couple of years ago I was given a partial box of the old Winchester 200 grain lubaloy Super Police load. I fired them out of 4 inch model 19; they grouped well but about 5 inches high at 25 yards. I wished I did some penetration tests or at least chronographed the load.

Last edited by John P.; 02-13-2013 at 07:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default

Again, thanks all for your kind replies to my question. Hope I can be of help to you one day. VL
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-14-2013, 05:11 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 206
Likes: 4
Liked 341 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Does any one know the history of the 200 gr 38 Special loadings such as when they first appeared and when they disappeared? On paper the load looks like an effective short range stopper. But as far a I can tell it ceased being offered after WW II, which says something about its practical effectiveness.

The only loading I have seen is Western's, which is the top left box pictured below.




Another, even more interesting to me, loading is the 38 S&W Super Police 200 gr loading pictured below. Like the 38 Sp Super Police box above, it is a Pre WW II box. Interesting also, the caliber,"38 S&W", is not called out at all on the box. Only "Super Police." This indicates to me that this loading predated the 38 Sp loading and the 38 Sp loading was maybe added to serve the 38 S&W users who were chaging over to 38 Sp guns and preferred the 200 gr bullet. At any rate, The 200 gr 38 S&W cases are Head Stamped as such. No, I have not tried these in my Terrier.


__________________
Rush
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 02-14-2013, 05:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 941
Liked 803 Times in 488 Posts
Default

I'm sure that it was offered well after WWII. I remember buying a box, not an old box as I recall, around 1966.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 02-14-2013, 07:03 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 28
Liked 836 Times in 538 Posts
Default

Back in the roaring 20's and Lawless 30's the top gun of the day was the 38 Super Auto with its high volosity and was carried by many bad guys and law officers but the standard for most LE was the little 38 special with its all lead bullet that would put men down but was not capable of penetrating auto bodys.

The 38-44 was the first 38 to break 1150 fps but they found out that copper jackets were needed to penetrate car bodys
and S&W went back to the drawing boards,til 1935.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 02-15-2013, 12:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default

BRush: I bought a box of the Western 200 gr. .38Sp ammo in 1973, modern manufacture. Thanks for your help! Kaaskop
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-16-2013, 11:03 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 708
Likes: 1
Liked 366 Times in 133 Posts
Default

I have a full box of Peters brand .38 Special 200 grain loads. The end flap is marked 38 Special 200 Grain Lead Index 3841. The box has the "Warning Keep Out of Reach of Children" marking so I guess it's post-1962. It is brass cased, headstamp is R-P over 38 SPL with a lead round nose bullet and they are in a styrofoam tray. It would be difficult to know that it was not a standard 158 gr LRN if the package was not marked.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 02-17-2013, 03:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Majority opinion on this round- speaking only of the Super Police version- was that it wouldn't penetrate car bodies, was too slow, was unstable in flight, and gave poor terminal ballistics no better than 158 grain RNL. However, that instability in flight, especially in a snub, might cause it to tumble upon striking flesh.

I'd really like to know the probabilities of that happening, because if it was 70% or higher, being hit with a long, tumbling 200 grain slug in the Super Police configuration, might equal or exceed the best results from modern hollow points regarding stopping power. This might be just the round for J-frames. Have any serious studies ever been made that a tumbling slug of this weight and configuration might produce superb one-stop shots?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-17-2013, 04:34 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 1,757
Liked 3,129 Times in 1,397 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
Anyone remember the old 200 grain W-W .38 Spl loads? The blunt nosed bullet looked vaguely like a thumb. Definitely not for 2" bbls, I recall 572 fps in one test. Now out of print, but are there any factory equivalents today?
Ah, the old "Super Police" load as it was called. Back in the day, ammo companies named their loads as a short hand way of getting the customer to remember the ballistics. It is confusing to us today unless you read up on the actual bullet weights and velocities.

That load was pretty feeble on the "receiving end," and although feeble, it was not really listed for use in the K frames, but it was authorized for use in the .38/44 revolvers (the heavier bullet made pressures higher). S&W used to say what loads were ok in particular models by using the load's name.

For example, K frames tended to be ok with 38 S&W Special and 38 S&W Special Mid-Range. The first was the standard old 158 grain load, while the second was the 148 grain wadcutter target load.

N frame 38s often listed acceptable loads as 38 S&W Special Hi-Speed, 38 S&W Special Super Police, 38 S&W Special and 38 S&W Special Mid-Range. The Hi-Speed load was the .38/44. The Super Police was the aforementioned feeble 200 grain loading.

N frame .357s listed all the same loads as the N frame 38s, but the first round listed was .357 Magnum, followed by the N frame list of 38s.

There were changes to the list over the years. For example, S&W at one point advertised its K frames as ok with the .38/44. Colt said its Police Positive and Detective Specials were ok with that load, so I am not sure how much was just S&W trying to compete for LE contract business, but later S&W stopped listing the .38.44 as ok with the K frame.

S&W also sold K frame 38 Specials to government agencies knowing they would be shot with low end .357 Magnum loads loaded into 38 Special cases on special contracts so agencies did not have to defend against idiots saying they were using Magnums. The so-called "Treasury Load" comes to mind. Essentially a 110 grain JHP .357 Magnum loaded into a 38 Special case.

That was not really a recent trend either as the original FBI purchase of Colt Police Positives instead of 1911 .45s was conditioned on the revolvers using the .38/44 Hi-Speed, but with the Keith sharp shoulder semi-wadcutter instead of the round nose. You can view the documents over at Larry Wack's excellent site: Historical G-Men.

Home - Dusty Roads Of An FBI Era

The documents on the weapons orders and the memo justifying the 38s based on the .38/44 with the Keith bullet are here:



(note the 1125 fps velocity of the 158 grain 38 Special Keith Semi-Wadcutter they adopted)



And, here is the Colt literature provided to the FBI at the time of the weapons order in 1933. Page 9 shows the loads authorized for use in the Police Positive.


Last edited by shawn mccarver; 02-17-2013 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 02-17-2013, 05:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Poynette, WI
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 5,965
Liked 670 Times in 427 Posts
Default

kaaskop49, thanks for starting this thread. I've learned a bunch from
it, and now have a clue to why the .38/200 isn't readily available.
I'm guessing that in a 2" barrel, to get any real working velocity,
it would have to be loaded pretty hot.
Thanks to the rest who've provided facts and insights.
TACC1
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 02-17-2013, 09:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

My uncle was a federal agent and in the late 60's early 70's I remember him showing me his issued ammo for his S&W M60 which was the 38 special 200gr. Super Police bullet. He told me that he did shoot a suspect twice with that round and it was very effective in stopping the suspect. I dont know any of the details of the shooting, but I am sure that shot placement is most important.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #23  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:31 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 21
Liked 426 Times in 257 Posts
Default

I've gotta challenge that comment about the 200 grain being unstable in flight, at least in non-snubbies. I fired quite a bit of handloaded (and some factory) 200 grain ammo back in the late 1960s at ranges up to 50 yards and found no sign of bullet instability in flight. [Uh, having typed this, I just recalled most of mine were loaded in .357 cases and those clocked 850 fps. I have no clue whatever what the .38 loads clocked. All velocities from 6 inch barrels.]

However, the stability was quite marginal. I clearly recall shooting a quart oil can (cardboard body, metal ends for those who've never seen one) filled with water at 50 yards. The bullet exit on the side of the can definately showed tumbling and the reaction to the bullet was much greater than that displayed by lighter, faster bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-22-2013, 01:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

WRMoore- I brought up the question of this round's instability in flight. You point out your results with a four-inch barrel, that stability was marginal. Agreed. Does it then follow that INSTABILITY in a SNUB is a given, or what percentage of shots are unstable from the short barrel? If the percentage is 70% or greater, then the 200 Super Police as a snub load might compare well if not better than the current snub loads.

Test run in gelatin might answer the question. Has anybody run such tests, and if so, what were the results as to crush cavity, stretch cavity, or any measure of stopping power generally accepted today?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:22 PM
cmj8591's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 365
Likes: 33
Liked 154 Times in 74 Posts
Default

Instability in a short barrel is not a given. All things equal, the bullet exiting the 2" barrel is as stable as if it came from an 8" barrel. Terminal stability is a different issue and is based mostly on bullet construction. The main reason that the ammo companies tried to load heavy for caliber bullets in the old days is that they didn't have the jacket metallurgy technology that we do today. Most of the ballistic science in those day was subjective at best. For example, the tests to find a replacement for the 38 Colt military round involved shooting cows at the Chicago stock yards and observing how long it took for them to die and how much discomfort the cow exhibited. Sometimes they got it right, like with the 45acp, but most of the time it turned into junk science. Heavy for caliber bullets for self defense fell out of favor because of the advancement of the jacketed hollow point design. The bullet companies have been able to design bullets that expand over a huge range of velocities and impact mediums. This is what drives defensive ammo design now. But the primary idea that we must remember is that the only constant in stopping dynamics is shot placement. Shot placement trumps everything in factoring stopping power.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 03-17-2013, 08:22 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 2
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Good morning everybody,

I remember very well that when I started my "handgunner career" in 1977 my dealer recommended the 200 grs police load as an ideal load for self defence in my Chiefs Special (mod.36) with three inch tube.
And I remember thisload to be a perfect "finisher" when it came to injured game (to-be road kills) up to 75 kg wild boars.
May be that nowadays the high-tech bullets do the same job with less weight - I am an oldt-timer and would very much prefer an industrial made 200grs. load for my .357/.38Special sixguns here in Germany.
I am not a reloader - but - anyway - I couldn't even find a 200 grs bullet in the catalogues.

Greetings from Germany
__________________
Honor as t h e way of life
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #27  
Old 03-17-2013, 08:35 AM
Skeptic 9c's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern Florida
Posts: 466
Likes: 18
Liked 67 Times in 42 Posts
Default

I recall an article in Guns Magazine back in the 1960s by Chic Gaylord. He recommended a 200 gr Super Police only in 5" or longer barrels.
Geoff
Who notes back then .38 Special revolvers were the most common police firearm.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 03-17-2013, 08:51 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Avery,Tx
Posts: 759
Likes: 94
Liked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Default

Like Erich says, king, queen & on the head of a pin.......
__________________
dd884
JMHO-YMMV
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-17-2013, 10:52 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 106
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I had a Lyman 358430 bullet mould and it dropped 200 grain round nose bullets. I loaded them in .357 brass. I used powder ranging from Universal to H110/W296 in speed and seated a bit over standard max length. I canít remember the max loads. These were plenty accurate out to at least 50 yards and pretty snappy with max loads. 25 yard groups were in the 1.5 to 2 inch range. I eventually got rid of the mould but it was fun to experiment with the bullets. Shot pretty well out of a Marlin 1894 too.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-17-2013, 12:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 702
Likes: 90
Liked 180 Times in 132 Posts
Default

I used to load 220 gr cast bullets in 38 spl for bowling pins. Stability was never a problem in my guns, and at a whopping 700 fps, the pins were very impressed with the load, even peripheral hits sent them flying.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-17-2013, 01:55 PM
DaGOOSExyz's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 296
Likes: 132
Liked 156 Times in 87 Posts
Default

I posted this a few days ago.

I ordered some 38/200 S&W ammo from The Old Western
Scronger. It indicated it was on back order so I figured it
could take quite awhile to receive it. Lo and behold four
days later it arrived. I couldn't believe it came so quick.
The point is if you have to go on back order you may get
lucky and receive it much quicker than you think. Also

This is not old ammo but made for them new. If you search these
boards a guy named Louisanna Man did some testing on this
ammo and posted it.

Last edited by DaGOOSExyz; 03-17-2013 at 02:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-17-2013, 02:38 PM
WaMike's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver USA
Posts: 265
Likes: 427
Liked 124 Times in 76 Posts
Default

A friend has a M&P in 38 S&W, so we loaded the usual wadcutters and 158 gr. with the larger-diameter bullets, then got curious after reading about the Brit 38-200, aka "380/200 Revolver Mk I." So we loaded some up, after finding .360"/200 gr. bullets from Western Bullets.

They shot so well I decided to get a couple of bullets from them for my 38 Special. Got Lyman #358430 & Saeco #351, and loaded them at a mild 750 fps. The Saeco is a little longer, so must be loaded deeper in the case.

I must say, they're a hoot, accurate, and do great damage to various wood-based products. I'm not so sure the Lyman wouldn't make a great home defense load.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-17-2013, 05:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Peach State! GA!!!
Posts: 3,676
Likes: 2,897
Liked 1,695 Times in 832 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 358156hp View Post
I used to load 220 gr cast bullets in 38 spl for bowling pins. Stability was never a problem in my guns, and at a whopping 700 fps, the pins were very impressed with the load, even peripheral hits sent them flying.
Hum... I'll admit that at the present I may not be thinking all that clearly since I don't feel very well. But, a 220 gr. cast bullet at 700 fps from a .38 Special does sound interesting.
__________________
<><
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-17-2013, 06:00 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 702
Likes: 90
Liked 180 Times in 132 Posts
Default

It's amazing what a little extra bullet momentum will do.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #35  
Old 03-17-2013, 10:33 PM
ArchAngelCD's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 4,263
Likes: 174
Liked 955 Times in 626 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
Thanks to all for your interest and the trip down 'Memory Lane!' You've read the same articles I have. Will look for a box on the collector's ammo tables at shows. Yes, jimmyj, it was called the Super Police and a 200-grainer also loaded in the shorter .38 S&W case. Supposedly a good stopper in the 1930s. VL
Speaking of a 200gr bullet in a 38 S&W case, I currently load 38/200 loads for my Enfield No2 revolver. It's fun to shoot something that was created so many years ago and almost forgotten today.

__________________
Freedom is never free!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #36  
Old 09-16-2014, 06:06 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Liked 210 Times in 132 Posts
Default Bullet availability

Yes , this is a moldy thread , but since the older threads on here serve as a reference for load data for certain historical loadings , I thought I'd add this source of commercial cast bullets.

Matt's Bullets (google them) offers :

.359 - 195gr similar to Super Police shape.

.361 - 200gr similar to Super police. Also 200grs in styles to duplicate Webly Mk I and Mk II loads.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #37  
Old 09-16-2014, 08:31 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bainbridge GA
Posts: 612
Likes: 486
Liked 234 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Penn Bullets has a 230 gr wadcutter for the 38 Special/357 Magnum. Might make a good snubby load. I was thinking that if you put a small angle on the flat nose it might tumble when it hits.

I have used a lot of 180-200 gr bullets in the 38 Special and 357 Magnum. Never saw any instability in flight and they were quite accurate. Even worked well in a 2 incher with heavy doses of 2400. With the Lyman 200 gr RN loaded to about 1000 fps in a 357 Magnum, you can have a lot of fun plinking at long range. The heavy bullet kicks up a lot of dirt on the berm when it hits so you can see where the bullet goes.

Western Bullets sells a number of heavy bullet designs if you want to try them.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #38  
Old 09-16-2014, 02:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yuma
Posts: 405
Likes: 35
Liked 158 Times in 97 Posts
Default

I mentioned a little test I did with some Super Police 200gr. in a thread here about the S&W .38/ .380 British.

I shot only 12 rounds. 6 out of my 2" M 10-7. They did not feel weak to me.

I also saw some crime sine photos of a murder committed with those 200gr Super Police loads. The wounds on the victims were pretty gruesome.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #39  
Old 09-16-2014, 05:32 PM
REM 3200's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi
Posts: 643
Likes: 552
Liked 428 Times in 209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjw3 View Post
I also recall that article from the Law Enforcement Handgun Digest by Grennell and Williams, ca. 1974. You are correct on the velocity from the 2" barrel. The authors also found that a point blank shot from that barrel length would not penetrate side window auto glass and would only put a shallow gouge in the body work.
Yeah, somebody said "Halt or I'll scratch up your paint".
__________________
CSM, US Army(Ret), 1963-1990
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #40  
Old 09-16-2014, 05:44 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 300
Likes: 15
Liked 157 Times in 79 Posts
Default

The 200-grain RN must have been at least reasonably popular at one point, because Hensley and Gibbs offered a mould for that projectile, specifically designed for the 38-200 load. I happen to have one of the moulds in ten cavity, and although the number of the mould escapes me, it drops a plain based round nosed bullet with two grease grooves, and like all H&Gs, if I do my part, all ten bullets drop at significantly less than one grain of difference in weight.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #41  
Old 09-16-2014, 05:52 PM
federali's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 753
Likes: 3,365
Liked 1,311 Times in 388 Posts
Default The Manstopper!

Way back when I first started with the U.S Treasury, the older guys referred to the 200 grain .38 Spl as the "manstopper." I don't know where the nickname came from or how widespread it was. At the time I had little knowledge of ballistics and it never occurred to me that a 2" revolver, what we were issued, was insufficient with these loads.

Like a fool, I shot off every "manstopper" I had and never thought to save a specimen for my cartridge collection.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #42  
Old 09-16-2014, 07:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default attn federali et al

My thanks to federali and others for resurrecting my zombie thread. I knew there was a purpose to my overdosing on the "Resident Evil" series of flicks. Other than Michelle Rodriguez...

Interesting how some folks say the 200 grainers are no great shakes while others who have used them in the field/street say otherwise. Somebody back then obviously felt they were useful since the factories dupe'd the 200gr .38 S&W Super Police load in the Special case. Old, out-of-print loads are a special interest of mine. .455 Colt (Canadian) anyone? Thanks again.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #43  
Old 09-18-2014, 02:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yuma
Posts: 405
Likes: 35
Liked 158 Times in 97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REM 3200 View Post
Yeah, somebody said "Halt or I'll scratch up your paint".
Back in the 60's my brother had a Karman Gaea. I was 8 or so and like a horrible little kid, I shot a side window with my BB gun. 1 shot 1 kill. The window shattered. I shot my 200gr Super Police loads through a 2" M 10 and it went through a 1200 page Cabalas hard bound catalog and a gallon jug or 2 of water. I can't imagine it not going through a cars side window at point blank range.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #44  
Old 09-19-2014, 10:00 PM
sigp220.45's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 2,665
Liked 2,247 Times in 491 Posts
Default

I love the old Super Police load. Thanks to a member here I finally located enough to keep my Diamondback loaded up with them.

__________________
Hate da circus-love da clowns
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #45  
Old 09-20-2014, 12:40 AM
DR505's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 751
Liked 3,588 Times in 1,315 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
My thanks to federali and others for resurrecting my zombie thread. I knew there was a purpose to my overdosing on the "Resident Evil" series of flicks. Other than Michelle Rodriguez...
I think you are referring to Mila Jojovich.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #46  
Old 09-20-2014, 01:02 AM
sigp220.45's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 2,665
Liked 2,247 Times in 491 Posts
Default

Michelle R is in some of the Resident Evil flicks, too:

__________________
Hate da circus-love da clowns
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #47  
Old 09-20-2014, 01:43 AM
DR505's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 751
Liked 3,588 Times in 1,315 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sigp220.45 View Post
Michelle R is in some of the Resident Evil flicks, too:
Oh yeah, but Mila was in ALL of them...I like her! Did her .38's weigh 200 grains?
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-20-2014, 03:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 8,544
Liked 1,884 Times in 994 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DR505 View Post
I think you are referring to Mila Jojovich.
No, DR505, I am absolutely NOT referring to Mila Jovovich!

Michelle Rodriguez absolutely rocks! Her clones, too.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-21-2014, 06:54 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yuma
Posts: 405
Likes: 35
Liked 158 Times in 97 Posts
Default

I don't think Ms. Rodriguez likes guys..........Just say'n
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-21-2014, 07:13 PM
Jim1392's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 339
Likes: 290
Liked 183 Times in 112 Posts
Default

This thread just made remember the old days. A few months ago when I bought my 642 I remembered I had some ammo in a plastic holder in the garage. I knew it had 38's in it and I wanted to take them to the range with the Critical Defense FTX rounds I bought to try in my new purchase. In it were 200 grain 38's, 158 grain 38's, and 10 were Super Vels. I left the Super Vels home but took the rest to the range. These rounds were at least 44 years old since I bought them when I became a LEO in 1970. They wouldn't let us carry hollow points so most of us carried the 200 grain round. Needless to say all fired like the day I bought them.

Last edited by Jim1392; 09-21-2014 at 08:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Ammo Thread, 200 gr. .38 Special loads in Ammunition-Gunsmithing; Anyone remember the old 200 grain W-W .38 Spl loads? The blunt nosed bullet looked vaguely like a thumb. Definitely ...
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://smith-wessonforum.com/ammo/295611-200-gr-38-special-loads.html
Posted By For Type Date
Smith & Wesson Forum This thread Refback 02-04-2013 02:54 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loads for my .44 special... flatapple Reloading 13 11-02-2012 11:25 PM
Recommendations? Easy 44 Special loads and Quality 22 LR loads dacoontz Ammo 17 05-12-2012 08:35 AM
125 grn loads for the 38 Special K-framer Reloading 7 01-30-2012 11:17 PM
44 Special Loads gunnysgt Reloading 29 05-05-2011 10:59 AM
.38 Special Loads PeterM Reloading 16 11-19-2009 04:23 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)