Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2013, 11:54 AM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,885 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems

I don’t usually gripe about customer service -in fact, my experience with firearms-related customer service - and reloading related customer service in particular - have been very good. But I had a bad experience with Federal just now, and thought I’d share it, because it was so unusual in relation to the service I’ve gotten on other ammunition issues.

So, yesterday I had brought a brand-new silver box of Federal Classic ammo to the range to try in my new-to-me pre-Model 30 Improved I-frame. The Federal Classic ammo was 98-gr RNL .32 S&W Long, part no. C32LB, lot number 3 19J155. Federal ammo is more expensive in this caliber than Eastern European stuff, but I figured the good thing about using big maker ammo from Federal would be that I’d be able to reload the empties. Based on decades of past experience, I figured I’d get quality brass after firing the low-pressure .32 S&W Long factory loads.

The ammo shot well enough (group at 10 yards), though was pretty tame (M 667.8/ES 78.95/SD 32.31).




But wait! Upon firing, I noticed that one round did a very odd spurt of stuff out of the bbl/cyl gap, and was surprised to find that I had to hammer on the ejector rod to get the rounds out of the cylinder. Out of five rounds, four split - and one had its primer pop out the back.









This was NOT the fault of the gun - I fired four other loadings on the same outing (two handloads - ironically in Federal cases, and two factory loadings by S&B and Aguila) with no problems whatsoever.

So, since this ammo wasn’t going to give me the reloadable cases that I’d been after, I figured I’d contact ATK; on advice of friend, I went to their site and filled out a contact form:

Quote:
Four out of five cases split on a new silver box of Federal Classic .32 S&W Long ammo, part no. C32LB, lot number 3 19J155. One primer protruded. The cases had to be forcibly extracted by hammering the ejector rod. This was not a problem with the gun, as several other loadings performed flawlessly.

Here are some photographs:

i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd222/505Erich/Handguns/2013-03-10_11-34-34_709.jpg

i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd222/505Erich/Handguns/2013-03-10_11-34-51_820.jpg

I deliberately purchased what I thought to be quality Federal ammo because I wanted the spent cases for reloading. Please contact me about this.
I was really surprised when Federal wrote back a terse, “Go Away” email:


Quote:
You bought old ammo, it has been sitting on the shelf. The brass split due to stress corrosion cracking. It was manufactured in 2003.

Thanks
Federal Ammunition
I was pretty amazed by this, and responded:


Quote:
Are you kidding me, or are you just insulting me? I've been happily reloading much of the same brass since the '80s, and you're going to tell me that your new, never-fired brass from only ten years ago will split when fired in a low-pressure factory loading in the .32 S&W Long cartridge.
I’ve not heard back. I’m not pleased with Federal/ATK’s handling of the situation; I would have expected that Federal/ATK would stand behind its products or care more about its customers.
__________________
Now go make God proud...

Last edited by Erich; 03-11-2013 at 11:58 AM. Reason: To clean up spacing
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2013, 12:58 PM
pps pps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Near Fresno, Peoples Repu
Posts: 309
Likes: 7
Liked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Hmmm....so...their ammunition has an "implicit expiration date" at which point the ammo becomes dangerous to the user? And this date is posted WHERE? lol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:09 PM
Retired LTC, USAR's Avatar
Retired LTC, USAR Retired LTC, USAR is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 118
Liked 1,179 Times in 379 Posts
Default

There is just so many things wrong with their response........and what the hell is "stress corrosing cracking"?

Sounds like this answer was given by their "Ammunition Expert"!!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:27 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,401
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,760 Times in 5,686 Posts
Default

It is too bad you can't find a re-call on any of that ammo.........over the ten years.

New, NEVER FIRED brass,splitting !! Hellow !!

I would expect them to admit it was a bad box of Brass and fix the problem.................

and yes, thats why we buy top of the line BRASS...........
because it usually last a long time,due to the process they
use to make it.

Sorry you reached a Butt Head.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:46 PM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,130 Times in 3,678 Posts
Default

I guess since they are selling every round they can produce and running 24 hours a day, " customer satisfaction " has gotten lost in the shuffle. I have found that when you have a problem and the person who replies is no help , or gives you a B. S. response, like the one you got, ask to speak to thier boss...You may have to make a phone call and speak to 2 or 3 people but the bosses know how important repeat business is and when you get ahold to someone who gives a darn you will get the satisfaction you deserve.
I had this happen at Midway..but after " let me speak to your boss " just once I got more than my problem solved.
Call them..they might even have a toll free number. What happened isn't normal and they should be concerend.
Gary
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 03-11-2013, 04:46 PM
brokenprism's Avatar
brokenprism brokenprism is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich View Post
I’m not pleased with Federal/ATK’s handling of the situation; I would have expected that Federal/ATK would stand behind its products or care more about its customers.
They do care. If you're Dept of Homeland Security. : )

Try this: Buy billions of rounds and see if the service improves.

Last edited by ditrina; 03-13-2013 at 07:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 03-11-2013, 05:15 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is online now
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 41,643
Liked 29,236 Times in 13,822 Posts
Default Well, now we know

Well, now we on this forum know that Federal produces ammunition with poor quality components that are not expected to last past a few years.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 03-11-2013, 05:25 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,942
Likes: 10,117
Liked 10,111 Times in 4,789 Posts
Default

That's interesting. I had a similar thing happen with .32 H&R Magnums back in the '90s some time. I forget what their explanation was but what you said has a familiar ring to it. Seems they said the brass was not properly annealed, which would go along with that explanation. They were decent enough about it and sent me about twice as many boxes of ammo as I returned to them. Then and now, I guess. The whole industry must be in hyperdrive and folks like us are so far down the priorities list we're not even on a list.

Last edited by M29since14; 03-12-2013 at 08:45 AM. Reason: correct spelling/typing
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 03-11-2013, 05:31 PM
R. G. Amos R. G. Amos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 732
Likes: 10
Liked 260 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Since you said you just bought the ammo, I would take whatever of the ammo you have remaining along with Federal's response to your note to the dealer from whom you purchased the ammo and ask him why he is selling old ammo. Stress corrosion cracking implies a crack that was initiated at a corrosion site under a load.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2013, 06:22 PM
Maddmax's Avatar
Maddmax Maddmax is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: N.E. Iowa Boondocks USA
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 5,524
Liked 1,599 Times in 993 Posts
Default

When you do call. Be very friendly and ask whom you are speaking to and jot that down along with time of day & date (everything "should" be logged an their end). Now you have some one to come back on when/if stuff hits any fan blades. Don't like their response,ask for a Super Visor. I'd chase that all the way to the top dog.

Look at it as keeping others SAFE from their faulty product.

I wouldn't let the box and what's left over out of your sight. I'd also get on the vendor about "digging up old unsafe ammo and selling it".
__________________
THIS WE'LL DEFEND ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-11-2013, 07:23 PM
max's Avatar
max max is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: illinois
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 1,850
Liked 6,685 Times in 2,117 Posts
Default

Well Erich, did you mention you were a hot shot lawyer? I am sure you did something wrong to cause this. Probably an improper grip or perhaps incorrect sight picture?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-11-2013, 07:42 PM
andyo5's Avatar
andyo5 andyo5 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 497
Liked 943 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Stress corrosion cracking implies that the brass contained residual stress, which would lead to corrosion over time. The brass should not be under stress unless it was not properly annealed after forming. If this is the case (no pun intended), then it is clearly their fault for having skipped a manufacturing step. And they want to blame you for that?
As others have said, I have been reloading range brass with 1980s head stamps on them without any problems. And once just for grins, I disassembled some 1918-dated 45ACP cartridges, replaced the old primers, reassembled them and fired them. They worked and the cases were just fine afterwards.
I would be offended by the reply that you received.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 03-11-2013, 08:26 PM
smitholdtimer smitholdtimer is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.C.
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 6,007
Liked 1,853 Times in 817 Posts
Default Look forward to hearing "The Rest Of tThe Story"

Please keep us informed as to the final out come, I'm sure you are going to submit a new complaint to someone of higher authority! You made contact on Monday and I've been told Monday & Friday are not the best days for manufacturing facilities, could be the same for the Customer Service Department.
__________________
Sam
S&WHF 333 S&WCA 2198
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-11-2013, 11:17 PM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,218 Times in 3,013 Posts
Default

I would guess that in a low volume selling round like this that the
ammo was not actually manufactured by Federal and so the brass is
not in fact high quality reloadable brass. Not to criticize but if I were
in your shoes I would have tried to find new quality brass to buy and
skipped the factory ammo debacle. I have learned that just because
factory ammo is packaged and priced as their premium line doesn't
mean it's anything more than mediocre. They should be willing to
replace your box with a new box of ammo but I doubt you'll find good
quality long lived brass in factory ammo for low pressure rounds that
are not often reloaded.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-12-2013, 03:12 AM
xcop xcop is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: S. California
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default federal

So what Federal is saying unintentionally or not is all their ammo could do this in ten years. Interesting position.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 03-12-2013, 03:26 AM
jaymoore's Avatar
jaymoore jaymoore is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 7,002
Liked 2,483 Times in 1,147 Posts
Default

When did ATK aquire Federal? Seems like it was after 2003, but I wasn't paying much attention.

BTW, Federal's Gold Medal Match .308 Winchester ammo has been known to have soft brass and be on the short side of headspace specs for quite some time. Usually it's good for 3-4 loadings before primer pockets have loosened to the point of uselessness. If it didn't shoot so well for the price (pre-feeding frenzy), it would likely be a complete sales failure.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-12-2013, 03:33 AM
J. R. WEEMS J. R. WEEMS is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 4,437
Liked 4,433 Times in 1,463 Posts
Thumbs down

I haven't read all the answers here but can tell you this a a CROCK of the first order. Some years ago I had the same problem with their 32 MAG. Several pieces of brass split from each box, it was NEW -- Also, several pcs., of brass split from each box of the ten I bought of just new brass. The answer was the brass is just too thin, period. I finally went through all I had, weeding out the split cases as they appeared. I went to STARLINE brass and NEVER had the problem again. I continue to be amazed at the people who proffer up such dumb a** excuses when their product is not up to quality standards. Also those people who think all reloaders are idiots trying to blow themselves up.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 03-12-2013, 07:45 AM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,885 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the supportive replies - a friend who knows people kindly offered to get this to the attention to the bigwigs at Federal, but I'm less concerned about being made whole than about letting people know about the kind of support they can expect as shooters and loaders.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 03-12-2013, 11:07 AM
coach22's Avatar
coach22 coach22 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 110 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Is what you describe any worse than putting
"Low Recoil" on their 357 Magnum ammo,
when it feels the same as their ammo not so marked?
It's like the markets who put "kosher for Passover"
on everything in their store 2 weeks before the holiday.
Having said that, all my 45's are loaded with Hydra Shoks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 357 Low Recoil.jpg (28.3 KB, 56 views)
File Type: jpg Colt Combat Commander E-.jpg (187.1 KB, 71 views)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-12-2013, 12:58 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,942
Likes: 10,117
Liked 10,111 Times in 4,789 Posts
Default

King-Tappan sights on that old beast?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-12-2013, 01:02 PM
coach22's Avatar
coach22 coach22 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 110 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Installed at King's, with a Barsto barrel & bushing
handpicked & fitted by Barsto himself.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-12-2013, 01:04 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,942
Likes: 10,117
Liked 10,111 Times in 4,789 Posts
Default

There you go! I never saw one of those that would shoot as they came from the factory.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:16 PM
blujax01's Avatar
blujax01 blujax01 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coach22 View Post
...
Having said that, all my 45's are loaded with Hydra Shoks.
All my 45's are loaded with Blujax' Finest.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:38 PM
Lost Lake's Avatar
Lost Lake Lost Lake is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1,039
Liked 2,358 Times in 1,117 Posts
Default

I would think stress corrosion cracking would be caused by the stress of corrosion expanding the brass.

Dissimilar metals reacting to create corrosion and that expansion cracking the brass. Or perhaps corrosion from another source but between the bullet and the brass.

Corrosion expands like ice or rust.

Just a thought.
__________________
Kirk / Spock 2020
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:40 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 9,402
Liked 8,885 Times in 2,566 Posts
Default

Quote:
Is what you describe any worse than putting
"Low Recoil" on their 357 Magnum ammo,
when it feels the same as their ammo not so marked?
Well, yes . . . my ammo is not really fit for its intended purpose.
__________________
Now go make God proud...
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:45 PM
andyo5's Avatar
andyo5 andyo5 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 497
Liked 943 Times in 518 Posts
Default

I would not let the inconsiderate and irresponsible comments of one employee of Federal Cartridge Company define my overall attitude towards that company. They make many fine products, and I doubt that the president or CEO of the company would appreciate the comments that were emailed to you.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-12-2013, 05:35 PM
moxie moxie is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 292
Liked 641 Times in 345 Posts
Default

Agree with Andy. Call federal, or ATK, and ask to speak with a supervisor. You know how to do the rest.
__________________
USAF, 69-92
Vietnam, 72-73
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-12-2013, 06:06 PM
armenius armenius is offline
US Veteran
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Low Country SC
Posts: 845
Likes: 2,521
Liked 1,443 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Several years ago I had a Glok-Kaboom! while using Federal 40S&W.Called Glock who said ship gun with no charges for repair.Was told problem was ammo and expect call from Federal.Within 10 minutes I got a call and told to return ammo for replacement.They returned more ammo than I sent and all was Premium Hydrashock while some of the original was FMJ practice ammo.I was treated great by Glock and Federal at no cost.
The.bad ammo was the old FC headstamp,the new Federal stamped.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-13-2013, 06:46 AM
andyems10 andyems10 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: East TN
Posts: 104
Likes: 5
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I also had some trouble with Federal HSTs in .40 recently. I contacted them about these rounds that deformed after loading them into my 40c magazine. They told me it was due to the magazine spring being too tight and that tends to happen with new magazines. I really didn't know how I needed to avoid putting rounds in a new magazine to keep this from happening. Anyway, they had me send them the deformed rounds which was about 10 of the 50 in the box. They told me they would inspect them when they received them. I sent them but all I ever got was a reply telling me they's send me a new box of 50 to make things right. Good enough. This was back sometime in January. They kept telling me they were on the way, but never came. I'd ask again, and they'd tell me they were ordered again. Back and forth for about 6 weeks being told they had been "ordered" several times but they never did ship them. They never gave me a good reason why they were never shipped after being ordered. Last week they finally told me they were out of stock and instead of bullets I'd be getting a check to compensate me for replacement. I told them I'd rather have the ammo than the cash, but they said they had no idea when they would get them back in stock and they were compensating me with a check instead. Not a bad outcome, sent in 10 rounds and getting $30 back, but I'd still rather have the ammo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1150004%20(1280x960).jpg (2.3 KB, 764 views)
File Type: jpg P1150008%20(1280x960).jpg (2.4 KB, 761 views)
File Type: jpg P1150007%20(1280x960).jpg (2.6 KB, 763 views)
File Type: jpg P1150011%20(1280x960).jpg (1.4 KB, 761 views)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-13-2013, 08:56 AM
desi2358 desi2358 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 36,263
Liked 934 Times in 496 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. G. Amos View Post
Since you said you just bought the ammo, I would take whatever of the ammo you have remaining along with Federal's response to your note to the dealer from whom you purchased the ammo and ask him why he is selling old ammo. Stress corrosion cracking implies a crack that was initiated at a corrosion site under a load.
With the current unrest and shortages in the ammo market you are liable to find a lot of old ammo on gunshop shelves. More than a few dealers are digging into their own personal stockpiles just to have something to sell so they can keep paying the bills. I've shot ammo a lot older than that without cases splitting or sticking.

Whoever it was at Federal that answered the OP is blowing smoke. That ammo is clearly defective, probably due to faulty annealing and they should take care of it. At what timeframe do they decide their ammo is no longer serviceable and free of any warranty obligation? Do they need to start putting a "Use By" date on the boxes? By any reasonable standard that ammo is not old and it should perform as required.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #31  
Old 03-13-2013, 12:11 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,799
Likes: 7,843
Liked 25,705 Times in 8,685 Posts
Default

Erich,
I've not had any dealings with federal or ATK, but just as you shouldn't write-off a new restaurant because of a lousy waitress, don't write them off just yet because you happened to get a Bozo on the line. If you have the patience to go higher up in the Company and still get the same numb-nuts response, then I could see that they have their butts up their kazoo! Give a Supervisor a call and see what they say. i would also make them aware of how your call was initially handled.

Regards,
Chief38
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-14-2013, 03:00 PM
nexus010 nexus010 is offline
Member
Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Just for a comparison i hought a box of .22 lr golden bullets from Remington and the whole box was defective. The bullet was loosee in the brass case. They sent me packing material to send the box back. They tested it and said it meet there specs. But still the box cost me 22 bucks and they sent me a check back for 60 bucks. Thats what i call service, and pretty cool too. Ahh, just thought id mention that.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #33  
Old 03-16-2013, 07:23 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems Displeased with Federal's response after ammo problems  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

There was a recall printed in gun magazines on Fed 32 H&R mag ammo with the hollow point bullet some 10 years or more ago. They admitted it was bad brass tempering/annealing. My cases looked exactly like yours. Fed replaced any ammo sent back at the time.

Your respondent is ducking Fedaral's culpability.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nice Response From Ammo Manufacturer Kid44 Ammo 3 08-28-2015 10:43 AM
Ammo Shipping/Problems - Keep it out of the Ammo FS thread. RED ZMAN Ammo 22 05-01-2013 10:59 AM
walmarts response to my email about ammo and firearms boudin The Lounge 31 02-01-2013 03:42 PM
Problems with Federal Bulk pack DownRange&Upwind Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 35 10-13-2010 11:59 PM
quick response on ammo cache marlin60 Ammo 14 03-27-2009 09:10 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)