Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2013, 09:19 PM
gtk's Avatar
gtk gtk is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado via MS
Posts: 336
Likes: 303
Liked 328 Times in 147 Posts
Default Ammo question

Going through some misc ammo

About How old are these Remington's?
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1375406285.390224.jpg

Also, I have some of this .38 special that says "not suitable for non-military purposes". What's so different about these ?
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1375406370.398562.jpg

Thx!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2013, 08:13 AM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtk View Post

Also, I have some of this .38 special that says "not suitable for non-military purposes". What's so different about these ?
Attachment 121905

Thx!
CYA. Probably not SAAMI spec.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2013, 09:14 AM
Mike6735 Mike6735 is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 5
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default

My guess is all three boxes of 158 grain LHP are the FBI load of that era (pre 1973) at which time the +P designation took effect under SAAMI. I have a Remington box of 125 grain JHP- definitely +P power but not so marked.

Can't speak to the military rounds- MichiganScott's answer is probably right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2013, 09:39 AM
gtk's Avatar
gtk gtk is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado via MS
Posts: 336
Likes: 303
Liked 328 Times in 147 Posts
Default

The winchester "super x" box must have been for Mississippi Law Enforcement. After looking closer, the shells are actually marked "+P".

I also have aquired close to 1,000 rounds of .38 wadcutters made from a company called "Star Reloading Co". I've ran a couple of these boxes through my taurus 357 (aka "test gun") with no issues ..

I would assume its all good to shoot.

Thx again !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2013, 06:14 PM
Steve C Steve C is offline
Member
Ammo question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
Liked 133 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Quote:
Also, I have some of this .38 special that says "not suitable for non-military purposes". What's so different about these?
These are FMJ bullets to comply with the military required use of such bullets under treaty obligation and lloaded to the mil spec of the time of manufacture which was not a powerful round. I have shot lots of FMJ .38 spl that was surplus from military contracts. The verbiage warning against use by Law enforcement is to dissuade the use of the less effective and over penetrating FMJ bullet for police work yet the military, mostly air force, armed their MP's with such ammo.

The others as already posted are police loads 158gr LSWCHP's that where the +P loads of the day before SAAMI set a "+P" standard. Such loads where called "police loads" or Hi-velocity loads or any other description the manufacturer decided to used to describe them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2013, 07:11 PM
30-30remchester 30-30remchester is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mountains of Colorado
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,428
Liked 6,630 Times in 1,832 Posts
Default

The Remingtons are from the 1970's, the Winchesters are late 70's to early 80's IIRC. The military I'm guessing are from WWII era as they are loaded with 158 grain full metal jacket bullets. These are not the weak rounds mentioned above. In the 1950's the military shifted to a light 130 grain bullet with reduced velocity. This ammo pictured is loaded to 850 fps from a 4" barrel IIRC. Now days that would be +P ammo. Before the lawyer era most all standard 38 special, 158 grain ammo was loaded to 850 fps. Now that tort lawyers have arrived this same weight of bullet is only loaded at 750 fps in most cases. I would suggest not WASTING the fmj ammo at targets and instead keep it for times you need maximum penetration.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 08-02-2013, 07:22 PM
pharmer's Avatar
pharmer pharmer is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 9,004
Likes: 9,236
Liked 14,709 Times in 4,706 Posts
Default

Star was a volume commercial reloader. I shot a ton of their stuff with zero malfunctions. It's not once fired brass as I recall rather loaded until they split. The military ball should have a year on the headstamp. These are " '91." Joe
__________________
Wisdom chases me; I'm faster
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2013, 11:15 AM
gtk's Avatar
gtk gtk is offline
Member
Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question Ammo question  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colorado via MS
Posts: 336
Likes: 303
Liked 328 Times in 147 Posts
Default

thx for the replies.

i'm keeping the military ammo, and shooting the rest
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ammo question Murf. Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 14 10-06-2014 11:53 PM
Ammo Question Riverman99 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 12 03-04-2014 12:43 AM
.40 ammo question crem1n0le Ammo 7 12-08-2010 12:10 PM
9mm ammo question clint_lnl Ammo 5 03-03-2010 09:31 PM
S&W 296 - Ammo Question S/W - Lifer Ammo 4 02-09-2009 06:18 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)