|
|
|
11-20-2013, 03:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
+P .38 Special self defence load for a 4" revolver
Looking for something to feed the fiance's 64-3 4" for home defence duty.
Is the FBI Load 158 gr LSWCHP still the king of the hill or is there something better now?
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
11-20-2013, 04:08 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Washington State
Posts: 53
Likes: 11
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Speer gold dot and federal hydroshock are both excellent rounds but the fbi load you mentioned can still get the job done...I keep hydroshocks in my model 19 as a bedside gun
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-20-2013, 04:10 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
I use the FBI load in four-inch and two-inch revolvers. I don't know if it's "king of the hill", and I'm sure many people will jump in here and say it's not. But it has a forty-year track record of effectiveness, and I trust it.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-20-2013, 04:12 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,812
Likes: 4,242
Liked 15,215 Times in 4,164 Posts
|
|
Another vote for the FBI load. I used it during my 30 yr. LEO career and know it works.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-20-2013, 04:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Any favorites as to which brand? I like Buffalo Bore but know the regular ammo companies made it first.
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
11-20-2013, 05:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: western suburbs of Chicag
Posts: 173
Likes: 3
Liked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Ammo choice
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMBLAZER
Any favorites as to which brand? I like Buffalo Bore but know the regular ammo companies made it first.
|
If you can find it the Remington load was the softest to aid expansion.
A small difference in your favor.
Good Luck
|
11-20-2013, 05:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMBLAZER
Any favorites as to which brand? I like Buffalo Bore but know the regular ammo companies made it first.
|
Remington has recently rebranded their FBI load and is marketing it to civilian customers -- but difficult to find right now.
Buffalo Bore has its version 158 grain LSWHC in both standard and +P pressure. From a four inch barrel, I'd opt for the standard pressure; from anything shorter, the +P.
Otherwise, you can shoot Speer's Gold Dot Short Barrel 135 grain +P or CorBon's DPX 110 grain +P with total confidence.
|
11-20-2013, 07:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
|
|
One more vote for the FBI load. It hits closer to point of aim than the lighter loads in fixed sight guns.
|
11-20-2013, 08:16 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 28
Liked 381 Times in 99 Posts
|
|
The "FBI" or "Chicago" load has worked for decades. It is comparatively easy on recoil, and in soft lead expands very reliably. In addition most .38 special revolvers with fixed sights (Colt & Smith at least) are sighted for a 158 gr lead bullet. The +P does not seem to matter much in POA/POI.
Not detracting from GD or other newer loads, but the older load is usually cheaper and the difference in actual performance is very minimal if any.
|
11-20-2013, 10:19 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,045 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
If she is not an experienced shooter, I would try a variety of loads and see which she gets along with best. A solid hit with a 148 gr wadcutter beats a miss with a heavier load, but even the 158 gr +P is not a heavy recoiling load in a 4" K frame.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-21-2013, 12:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 474
Liked 1,447 Times in 670 Posts
|
|
I'm a little late to the discussion, but the Remington 158 gr. LSWCHP, Speer 135 gr. Gold Dot and the Winchester 130 gr. PDX1 are some of the highest regarded +P loadings in .38 Special. Speaking from personal experience, the one most likely to shoot to point of aim with a K frame is the Remington "FBI" load, but I encourage you to try all three to see if one or more of them that "work" well for your wife.
I can also tell you that while felt recoil is subjective, I've always found that the FBI load is a "peach" to shoot from a full sized service revolver like your M64. The recommendation to use standard wadcutters is also not bad advice in the slightest if it turns out she's sensitive to recoil.
|
11-21-2013, 01:03 AM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapworth
Remington has recently rebranded their FBI load and is marketing it to civilian customers -- but difficult to find right now.
|
It appears to be a slight change from the original, which has been marketed to civilians for decades and not actually used by the FBI for quite a long time.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
11-21-2013, 12:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shouldazagged
It appears to be a slight change from the original, which has been marketed to civilians for decades and not actually used by the FBI for quite a long time.
|
What are the changes?
|
11-21-2013, 01:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: western Washington
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 1
Liked 763 Times in 454 Posts
|
|
I'm surprisd not to see more posts advocating use of the various lightweight JHP whizbang loads that are all the rage these days. I thought for sure the original post would ignite a big argument about the merits of those vs the old-fashioned FBI load.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-21-2013, 01:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 164
Likes: 9
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Out of a 4" barrel your options are expanded a bit.
Speer 135 g. SB
FBI load
Remington Golden Saber performs well out of a 4" barrel.
|
11-21-2013, 01:55 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapworth
What are the changes?
|
I haven't researched it to be sure, but I think I recall reading in a post here that the cases are unplated brass instead of plated, and there may be a slight change in the bullet configuration. I hope if they altered the bullet that it tests as being more effective--the old style is a thoroughly time-tested design.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
11-21-2013, 02:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 117
Liked 771 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shouldazagged
I haven't researched it to be sure, but I think I recall reading in a post here that the cases are unplated brass instead of plated, and there may be a slight change in the bullet configuration. I hope if they altered the bullet that it tests as being more effective--the old style is a thoroughly time-tested design.
|
I bought two boxes of the "HTP" line FBI load(the new version, not the old one) a few months back, and the cases are nickel plated.
And, just to pile on here, I like the "FBI Load" and the Speer 135gr +P gold dot.
|
11-21-2013, 02:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yuma
Posts: 801
Likes: 176
Liked 436 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod150
I'm surprisd not to see more posts advocating use of the various lightweight JHP whizbang loads that are all the rage these days. I thought for sure the original post would ignite a big argument about the merits of those vs the old-fashioned FBI load.
|
OK. I'll do it.
I have a box of Federal brand FBI loads stashed in my bedroom, however, I have Glaser Safety Slugs in every caliber I own. I gave my daughter a m 37 loaded with Glasers. It is a fairly light bullet and therefore has mild recoil. I , of course have no first hand experience with it, up understand the Royal Hong Kong Police (when they were around) issued it to their anti drug detail. Mas Ayoob gave it a good write up years ago.
Last edited by poordevil; 11-21-2013 at 02:24 PM.
|
11-21-2013, 04:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 619
Likes: 8
Liked 286 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
The FBI 158 +P lead hollow point is always, I think, a good choice but it turns an airweight revolver, a J-frame especially, into a nasty little bit*h for practice. My ears tell me that the CCI/Speer +P 135 Gold Dot hollow point has a decent record. It still stings a bit in an airweight, but less so. In a mid-weight K-frame, I'd choose the FBI load.
|
11-21-2013, 05:26 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shil
The FBI 158 +P lead hollow point is always, I think, a good choice but it turns an airweight revolver, a J-frame especially, into a nasty little bit*h for practice. My ears tell me that the CCI/Speer +P 135 Gold Dot hollow point has a decent record. It still stings a bit in an airweight, but less so. In a mid-weight K-frame, I'd choose the FBI load.
|
True about the FBI load in an Airweight. In an all-steel J-frame it's much more comfortable.
But since the OP asked specifically about loads for a four-inch M64, it's not a problem. As has been noted, there's a greater variety suitable for K-frames, but I still like old tried-and-true.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
11-21-2013, 06:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
I'm new to the .38 special world. I just acquired a J-frame M36 with a 2" barrel. Would the "FBI" loads everyone is talking about be a good defensive carry round for this gun as well - provided I can handle the recoil?
|
11-21-2013, 06:48 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: illinois
Posts: 6,299
Likes: 1,850
Liked 6,696 Times in 2,119 Posts
|
|
If she is not a shooter, I would give her factory target wadcutters.
|
11-21-2013, 06:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
I'm new to the .38 special world. I just acquired a J-frame M36 with a 2" barrel. Would the "FBI" loads everyone is talking about be a good defensive carry round for this gun as well - provided I can handle the recoil?
|
Yes; one of the nice things about the FBI load is that it tends to expand well out of snubbies.
|
11-21-2013, 07:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
|
|
|
11-21-2013, 08:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
On critters up to and including deer, the 158 grain lead SWC +P load is outstanding. Either in factory guise or in handloaded equivalent, I won't consider anything else.
|
11-21-2013, 08:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapworth
Yes; one of the nice things about the FBI load is that it tends to expand well out of snubbies.
|
Great! How can I identify it at the ammo counter? I don't suppose it says "FBI Load" on the box. What specifically do I ask for? Remington 158 grain +P 38 special? Any other specifications I need to reference when purchasing?
Sorry for being so ignorant, but I'm still learning. I don't know what some of the acronyms like "SJHP" or "HTP" or "LSWCHP" used by some of the posters in this thread mean...
|
11-21-2013, 09:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Great! How can I identify it at the ammo counter? I don't suppose it says "FBI Load" on the box. What specifically do I ask for? Remington 158 grain +P 38 special? Any other specifications I need to reference when purchasing?
Sorry for being so ignorant, but I'm still learning. I don't know what some of the acronyms like "SJHP" or "HTP" or "LSWCHP" used by some of the posters in this thread mean...
|
The FBI Load is the LSWCHP. Lead Semi Wad Cutter Hollow Point.
SJHP = Semi Jacketed Hollow Point
HTP is I think just a brand name of Remington's for a line of it's pistol ammo.
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
11-21-2013, 09:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Great! How can I identify it at the ammo counter? I don't suppose it says "FBI Load" on the box. What specifically do I ask for? Remington 158 grain +P 38 special? Any other specifications I need to reference when purchasing?
Sorry for being so ignorant, but I'm still learning. I don't know what some of the acronyms like "SJHP" or "HTP" or "LSWCHP" used by some of the posters in this thread mean...
|
No need to apologize -- we're all still learning here.
The load is called Remington High Terminal Performance Ammunition 38 Special +P 158 Grain Lead Hollow, product #22301.
"SJHP" means "semi-jacketed hollow point"; HTP is "high terminal performance"; LSWHP is "lead semi-wadcutter hollow point", sometimes "hollow core".
|
11-21-2013, 11:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,829
Likes: 7,854
Liked 25,753 Times in 8,706 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMBLAZER
Looking for something to feed the fiance's 64-3 4" for home defence duty.
Is the FBI Load 158 gr LSWCHP still the king of the hill or is there something better now?
|
https://www.buffalobore.com/index.ph...t_detail&p=108
From a 4" barrel this Buffalo Bore 158 grain +P LSWCHP .38 Special will give you just about .357 Magnum performance (1165 ft/sec) without all the drawbacks of the flash, noise, kick, and muzzle blast. IMHO it's about the best you can get for a 38 Special.
S&W mod. 60, 2 inch- 1040 fps (379 ft. lbs.)
S&W mod. 66, 2.5 inch- 1059 fps (393 ft. lbs.)
Ruger SP101, 3 inch- 1143 fps (458 ft. lbs.)
S&W Mt. Gun, 4 inch- 1162 fps (474 ft. lbs.)
|
11-22-2013, 12:28 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
I'm new to the .38 special world. I just acquired a J-frame M36 with a 2" barrel. Would the "FBI" loads everyone is talking about be a good defensive carry round for this gun as well - provided I can handle the recoil?
|
When the M10 and M36 were the main carry handguns by law enforcement the FBI Load was the common carry ammo. It was so common because it performed well in both and was street tested in both.
I do like all the new bullets that have been developed for the .38 Special because they do work well but I could be just as happy if I only had the original FBI Load. I do carry the FBI Load in my M36 but more often I carry the Speer 135gr short barrel +P load in my S&W M442. It all comes down to which is most accurate in the revolver I'm carrying at the time.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
11-22-2013, 12:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 117
Liked 771 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Here's a picture of a recent Remington "HTP" FBI load box
|
11-22-2013, 01:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Great info guys. So the LSWCHP is a completely un-jacketed flat nosed hollow point. And that is better as a defensive round than a semi-jacketed hollow point? No lack-of-penetration issues with the soft lead bullet?
|
11-22-2013, 01:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben_hutcherson
Here's a picture of a recent Remington "HTP" FBI load box
|
Cool. Are those plated brass casings? Re-loadable?
|
11-22-2013, 01:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Great info guys. So the LSWCHP is a completely un-jacketed flat nosed hollow point. And that is better as a defensive round than a semi-jacketed hollow point? No lack-of-penetration issues with the soft lead bullet?
|
Actually the lead bullet penetrates nicely. Less drag than a brass jacketed bullet. May mean slightly less "gnarly" wounding inside but they make up for it with consistent expansion and nice mushrooming. Do a search on YouTube for guys testing these types of bullets. The tests get monotonous as they each result in nicely mushroomed 158gr lumps of lead.
The other nice benefit of the LSWCHP is IF (and I say IF because they have a reputation for expanding well) they don't expand it's still a Semi Wad Cutter and will likely bore a nice clean .355-357 hole straight through who/whatever you shoot. Lots of crushed and cut tissue damage with bleeding unlike round nosed bullets that tend to just push tissue aside as it goes through.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Cool. Are those plated brass casings? Re-loadable?
|
Nickel plated. Reload just like any other US made cartridge.
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
11-22-2013, 01:17 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Great info guys. So the LSWCHP is a completely un-jacketed flat nosed hollow point. And that is better as a defensive round than a semi-jacketed hollow point? No lack-of-penetration issues with the soft lead bullet?
|
No one said the FBI load is better or worse, it's just time tested and proven. We are talking about 50 year old technology that still works and it won't cost you almost $2/round.
I know it's hard to believe but back in history there was nothing but lead bullets and somehow people were able to stop the bad guys. Now I would never recommend the LRN bullet in the .38 Special because it just didn't work. It has the nickname of "the widow maker" and with good reason. The LSWC/HP bullet is a much better performer.
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
11-22-2013, 01:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchAngelCD
Now I would never recommend the LRN bullet in the .38 Special because it just didn't work. It has the nickname of "the widow maker" and with good reason...
|
LRN = Lead Round Nosed?
A little reading between the lines has me thinking that calling it "the widow maker" wasn't a reference to its ability to take out the bad guys?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2013, 01:41 AM
|
|
Moderator SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 8,877
Likes: 1,029
Liked 5,070 Times in 2,660 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
LRN = Lead Round Nosed?
A little reading between the lines has me thinking that calling it "the widow maker" wasn't a reference to its ability to take out the bad guys?
|
Correct on both counts. The lead round nose bullet as a self-defense or law enforcement round was a dismal failure!
__________________
Freedom is never free!!
SWCA #3437
|
11-22-2013, 03:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 37
Likes: 2
Liked 34 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
While the 158gr LSWCHP is a solid choice bullet technology has developed in the last years and I would not write off the Speer Gold Dot and Hornady Critical Defence loads. They are tailored to perform in a 2" but work just as well in a 4"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2013, 02:37 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben_hutcherson
Here's a picture of a recent Remington "HTP" FBI load box
|
Thanks got posting that. As a long-time user of the FBI load I found that reassuring. To my less-than-efficient old eyes the cavity looks as if it could be a tiny bit wider, but if so it's very little. Looks as if it still would work very well indeed.
I'm by no means writing off the Gold Dot Short Barrel load. If it's good enough to be approved by NYPD it should be quite effective. The problem is finding it.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
11-22-2013, 04:16 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 3,191
Liked 12,777 Times in 5,693 Posts
|
|
Buffalo Bore has two +P loadings in the 158 Lead for the 38 special, with a 2" barrel.
I would think the 20A at 1040 fps was designed for the revolvers with a K frame or heavier...........
the 20c load at 850 fps being for the lighter J frame. (Note) both use a gas check to minimize leading.
Federal, Winchester and Remington all have made the "FBI Load" with the Remington getting most of the use in snub nose revolvers due to the softer lead bullets used.
There are several "Bonded" new style ammo loads now, that will do a good job........ if they will be accurate in your guns and shoot close to POA.
Most K frames will shot 99% of ammo well, it is just a matter of finding a box of ammo that hits where you are aiming or has a recoil that you feel comfortable with...............
and today, if you can find it.
Good shooting.
|
11-22-2013, 05:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevada Ed
Buffalo Bore has two +P loadings in the 158 Lead for the 38 special, with a 2" barrel.
I would think the 20A at 1040 fps was designed for the revolvers with a K frame or heavier...........
....
|
Well Ed, there's a thread in the CC forum stating that Buffalo Bore does not "keep exemplars" of each lot produced, making them the same as reloads in the eyes of those who fear theoretical court reprisal.
|
11-22-2013, 05:53 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 641
Likes: 51
Liked 1,177 Times in 318 Posts
|
|
I've got the Remington brand FBI Load in my nightstand Combat Masterpiece.
__________________
Loyalty Above All.. but Honor
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2013, 06:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
|
|
I favor
I use a .38 + P load of a 140 gr. Sierra HP going about 1000ft/sec. I prefer Gold Dot bullets but haven't been able to find any. I load these in my .357 because I want to keep our hearing (musicians) and not fire .357 rounds in the house. I think they are perfectly adequate for close quarters.
Speer doesn't recommend 158 gr bullets for .38 because they don't stabilize. I know when shooting out of a 2" barrel they don't. You've got a 4" barrel that has to be better. If I load low-end .357 rounds instead I'll use a 158 gr bullet.
I don't know if being unstable really affects a bullets terminal performance. I really can't see a bad guy gasping, "That bullet wasn't stable" before he buys it.
Last edited by rwsmith; 11-22-2013 at 07:02 PM.
|
11-22-2013, 07:04 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 3,522
Liked 6,744 Times in 2,626 Posts
|
|
I vote for the FBI load also. The Remington S12 or the Winchester SPD load are the correct loads. Winchester is the original.
The original "FBI Load" from 1933 is still not too shabby. Try Buffalo Bore 20H/20, which is a Keith 158 grain Hard Cast Semi-Wadcutter at 1,150 fps (the real 38/44 load). This is the load the FBI adopted in its Colt Police Positive revolvers in 1933.
|
11-22-2013, 07:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Frankfort, KY
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 117
Liked 771 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shouldazagged
I'm by no means writing off the Gold Dot Short Barrel load. If it's good enough to be approved by NYPD it should be quite effective. The problem is finding it.
|
I have a partial box of this load, and have been looking for more for a year or so now. I have not seen any locally in that time. About the only 38/357 Gold Dots I've been able to find anywhere are the 125 and 158gr loads in 357 Magnum(I did stock up on 125s when I found them at the gun show for $20/box).
About this time last year, SGAmmo had the 38 special short barrels in Law Enforcement boxes(50 rounds rather than 20 for the consumer boxes) for a really low prices-I think around $30. I'm still kicking myself for not buying a few.
|
11-22-2013, 11:21 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwsmith
Speer doesn't recommend 158 gr bullets for .38 because they don't stabilize. I know when shooting out of a 2" barrel they don't.
|
Could you clarify for me, please? I've never heard that about the +P 158gr. LSWCHP from a two-inch barrel.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
11-22-2013, 11:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Supposedly one of the greatest features that it always work well out of snubnoses. Lord knows there's about a zillion videos on YouTube about that round being shot through snubnoses.
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
11-23-2013, 11:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,004
Likes: 41,670
Liked 29,251 Times in 13,831 Posts
|
|
I think the old velocity standard....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapworth
What are the changes?
|
I think the old velocity standard was 980 fps.
|
11-24-2013, 05:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 261
Likes: 36
Liked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Well, I think I have a choice, at least for now.
I have three boxes of Buffalo Bore non +P short barrel flash suppressed 158gr LSWCHP's. I intended it for our snubs and didn't think too much of it out of the 4" K frame until I noticed on BB's site they list it at 980fps or so out of a 4".
She can shoot regular 158gr ammo well so this isn't much harder recoiling. It's in "+P" territory when coming out of the 4" tube. I also have it. The flash suppressed powder is also a plus.
If I can ever find any of their more hotly loaded stuff and/or the Remington or Winchester version of the LSWCHP +P I will pick it up. Right now I can't locate any.
__________________
Caretaker of a small herd.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2013, 06:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Morgan County Alabama -
Posts: 440
Likes: 156
Liked 134 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMBLAZER
If I can ever find any of their more hotly loaded stuff and/or the Remington or Winchester version of the LSWCHP +P I will pick it up. Right now I can't locate any.
|
The "original" Remington Express catalog # for the FBI Load is R38S12
Remington recently changed the FBI load from the Express labeled stuff to their HTP line of ammo and it is catalog # RTP38S12.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|