|
|
|
12-08-2015, 08:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew2105
Found these in my archive. Would you suppose that they would do well in a J frame .357? They are a little old & probably not as powerful as when new. Not as expensive as you would think.
|
I have a box of the same ammo. I've shot quite a bit of old ammo. If stored properly, there should be no loss of performance, IMHO. I would not hesitate to use it for SD if necessary. I shoot W-W 110gr JHP .357 in my M&P 340s; it is my preferred load. Unknown if the S-V offering is any different. In a steel frame J .357, I would not hesitate to use it. The gun IS chambered for .357.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
12-09-2015, 02:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 497
Likes: 82
Liked 681 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
I still carry my handloads in my M19. I'm going to try these over some Red Dot or Green Dot. The 140 gr. I've always had good results with bullets in that weight range.
HornadyŽ .38 Caliber .357" Diameter Pistol Bullets : Cabela's
Last edited by shotgun693; 12-09-2015 at 02:57 PM.
Reason: Added Info
|
12-11-2015, 12:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,632
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
Earlier comment made about using mercury to remove bore leading. I have done that a lot, and it works fast and extremely well. HOWEVER - I have no idea where one would buy mercury today (possibly a lab supply house), and one must be very careful in using it to avoid and contain spills, and to always use it outside, not in the house. I've had the same small bottle for over 50 years and have de-leaded lots of bores over that time.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-26-2016, 02:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 116
Likes: 94
Liked 94 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
So I take it that the copper "wash" on some of the older rounds (.38 S&W 38 spl and .357 for several examples) was there for appearance sake? Or perhaps in my wildest dreams a coating over the lead for health reasons? WW & Peters are two that I can recall. Health?? I don't think so.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-27-2016, 11:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew2105
So I take it that the copper "wash" on some of the older rounds (.38 S&W 38 spl and .357 for several examples) was there for appearance sake? Or perhaps in my wildest dreams a coating over the lead for health reasons? WW & Peters are two that I can recall. Health?? I don't think so.
|
Appearance. Sales appeal. Pizzazz. I only remember some of the W-W loads having this "copper wash" (??) coating, not the R-P ammunition.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
06-03-2016, 04:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 402
Liked 5,055 Times in 1,639 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49
Grips can have 2 "faces:" one when installed, and a 2nd when fired. The Colt Mk V .357 snub had a nice-feeling service-style wood grip that turned into a beast when fired with Mag loads. I found a pair of Pach Grippers, but they made the gun as heavy as a 4". Adios, muchacho.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
Interesting. I had a MK III snub. With the stock grips and a Tyler T-Grip it handled Speer Lawman 140 gr JHPs as well or better than my 4" M28. I know they changed the grip frame profile somewhat between "Marks" but it sounds like a radical switch in geometry.
__________________
I need ammo, not a ride.
|
06-04-2016, 09:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,114
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,322 Times in 4,240 Posts
|
|
1950-1960 era:
.357 factory 158 grain lead SWC with copper colored bullet.
***leaded bore BIG TIME !
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-04-2016, 10:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 2,258
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,486 Posts
|
|
My carry load (my purchase) was the .357 mag. Super Vel 137 gr. JSP in the early 70's. In the mid-70's the Border Patrol issued 158 gr. JSP in .357 mag. In the mid 80's the USBP transitioned to the 110 gr. .38 SPL "Controlled Expansion" round. Not long after the failure of that round in the field, they issued the .357 mag. 125 gr. JHP.
|
06-04-2016, 12:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
There is a link on here for Skeeter Skelton, lawman,hunter,hand loader and hand gun expert,check it out:
Skeeter Skelton
|
06-04-2016, 12:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,632
Likes: 241
Liked 29,144 Times in 14,091 Posts
|
|
The earliest .357 cartridges made in the late 1930s used metal-capped or metal tip bullets, as did .38-44 cartridges. Those bullets looked like RN FMJ, but the metal cap covered only the exterior of the bullet outside the case. The bore bearing surface was lead. Therefore they leaded bores. Shortly thereafter, the semi-wadcutter style lead bullet appeared in the .357. Of course, they also leaded bores. Conventional lead bullet guidance, such as from the Lyman cast bullet handbook, is that with an MV much over 1100 ft/sec, bore leading is to be expected. True back then, but with newer lubricants and bullet coatings, maybe not so much now.
Liquid mercury is the most effective cure for leaded bores. That is, provided you happen to have some mercury around the house, and know how to handle it. Many of the old-time revolver shooters carried around a small bottle of mercury for that purpose.
Last edited by DWalt; 06-04-2016 at 12:44 PM.
|
06-04-2016, 11:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico & Arizona
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 735
Liked 1,460 Times in 644 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgun693
I got into Law Enforcement in 1977. Most guys that carried a .357 had some kind of LSWC. There were a few JHP but they were expense and didn't expand unless fired into concrete. The JHP bullet was simply a FMJ with a HP bored into it. There were Super Vels but they were really expensive. I bought one box for my 1911 .45, I used'm as long as I could then went to a 200 gr LSWC. I just didn't have the income to afford more. BTW, lead in the barrel was no problem. You covered the forcing cone with one finger, poured mercury in the barrel, covered the muzzle end of the barrel with another finger and tilted it back and forth a few times. A cloth patch pushed all the lead out and you could use that mercury over and over. There were guys carrying .38s, I only remember the LRN being used in them. The guys with 9 mm all carried the RNFMJ. I was carrying a M28 in my first gunfight. I loaded my own ammo because I knew the factory stuff wasn't the best. I found a Sierra Bullet, I think it was, that had a 3/4 jacket, with a very soft SWCHP front end. It worked very well. In the late '80s we were discouraged from carrying our own loads but there was some JHP ammo available by then. From '77 until '91 I provided my gun, ammo and leather gear. We then got the low bid gun, leather and ammo. Some departments issued better stuff and many didn't. Until the late 80s at least 50% of the guys carried a shotgun, their own, with buckshot, whatever was on sale.
|
Well, I started in LE in the mid-70's and my department issued the Federal 125 JHP rated at 1450 FPS in a 4" barrel !. It had quite a bit of exposed lead and expanded well. This was the round that built the 357's stopping power legend!
__________________
Support your Police, & NRA
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|