Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > Ammo

Notices

Ammo All Ammo Discussions Go Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2016, 04:41 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,178 Times in 4,571 Posts
Default Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+

So, this afternoon, as a respite from the drudgery of work, the boss decided a range outing was in order (hey, I didn't need any special invitation!) so I brought several guns to work (I could have brought them up to the office but it was unnecessary to drag all that iron around so it remained in the car's trunk) and a variety of ammunition. Let's talk about my very modern 4" 686+ and the Mag-Tech cartridges I was using.

One out of every cylinderful, more or less*, failed to fire. All had firing pin marks and the range officer called them light strikes. Then he added that it could be bad primers.

*I say more or less because some cylinders fired completely and a couple had several failures to fire.

When I was encountering this I would re-fire these cartridges. Only one fired on a subsequent try.

When I was done with the Mag-Tech rounds I switched to Speer Lawman ammunition - I had about 25 rounds. They all fired fine.

And you say.......?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:15 PM
bigwheelzip's Avatar
bigwheelzip bigwheelzip is offline
Absent Comrade
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 12,990
Likes: 17,229
Liked 41,504 Times in 9,146 Posts
Default

I bought a case of Magtech 158FMJ on sale about a year ago, for use in my 686-6 Plus's. No failures at all. I won't buy more because it's very sooty.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:16 PM
Iggy's Avatar
Iggy Iggy is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 10,425
Liked 28,230 Times in 5,272 Posts
Default

Well, maybe it's kinda like a little gal down in Loredo told me one night.

"Honey, I think your firin' pin is too short."
__________________
Eccentric old coot

Last edited by Iggy; 04-07-2016 at 05:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:25 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,178 Times in 4,571 Posts
Default

Yes, Iggy, but the proper response is "It works for my purposes!"

I'll check the screws but the Speer ammunition was fine.

We'll see.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:36 PM
gen3guy gen3guy is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 604
Likes: 21
Liked 660 Times in 284 Posts
Default

I suspect that the ammo is at fault here. Specifically the primers. The fact that the Speer Lawman ammo functioned flawlessly is very telling. Technically it is a "light strike" and it's also possible that if you tried firing that ammo in another firearm it would function perfectly.

I had a similar problem with a Charter Arms Bulldog (admittedly not a Smith & Wesson) and some reloads. The little revolver functions fine with any factory load but I get "light strikes" with my reloads using Winchester primers. When I put the rounds that failed to fire in my Super Blackhawk they all go bang. If I switch to CCI primers, the little Bulldog works 100%. You would probably have a hard time convincing Mag-Tech that their ammo is at fault so just switch to Speer Lawman and move on.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 04-07-2016, 05:49 PM
cjwils cjwils is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northwest US
Posts: 190
Likes: 2
Liked 88 Times in 53 Posts
Default

A few years ago, I had a lot of trouble with Magtech 357 and 38 ammo failing to fire. That was in several different revolvers of different sizes and different brands. Those same revolvers all fired perfectly (and still fire perfectly) with several other brands of ammo and with all of my reloads. I am certain it was the Magtech ammo, and I have refused to buy any Magtech since then. Maybe they have fixed their problem by now, but I still refuse to buy Magtech.

Last edited by cjwils; 04-07-2016 at 05:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-09-2016, 06:49 PM
soFlaNative's Avatar
soFlaNative soFlaNative is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 10,707
Likes: 16,609
Liked 25,644 Times in 7,899 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjwils View Post
I am certain it was the Magtech ammo, and I have refused to buy any Magtech since then. Maybe they have fixed their problem by now, but I still refuse to buy Magtech.
I hope so, just received some of their "Shootin' Size" 158 gr. LRN at a good price from sgammo. Never used these loads. Length was even with uniform primers. I'll just try a few cylinders each in a couple revolvers and see what happens.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:36 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
Default

It is probably harder than average primer cups, but it wouldn't hurt to check the strain screw anyway, just to be sure. I mean, what does it cost to remove the grips, do a visual inspection, and put a screwdriver on the screw to check it, right?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:42 PM
Peak53's Avatar
Peak53 Peak53 is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 6,288
Liked 7,472 Times in 2,287 Posts
Default

did the failures happen in single action, double action, or both? Has there been any trigger work done?
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:51 PM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,135 Times in 3,678 Posts
Default

This situation sounds like what happens when primers are not seated completely down into the pockets. The first blow doesn't fire them but seats them completely in the pocket , the second time around they fire.
And the Speer rounds all fired...points to ammo related and possibly primer related. Not hard to imagine a batch of cases not getting primers completely seated, or it could be any of several primer things.
Make sure all your screws are tightened and try again with some different ammo.
Make sure all the springs are stock. swapping out lighter springs for a lighter pull can cause reliability problems .
Gary

Last edited by gwpercle; 04-09-2016 at 07:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-09-2016, 07:54 PM
Nevada Ed's Avatar
Nevada Ed Nevada Ed is offline
US Veteran
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 13,405
Likes: 3,189
Liked 12,771 Times in 5,690 Posts
Default

Ammo is ammo..............

49 out of 50 times it is the .................

Weapon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-10-2016, 01:41 PM
Gitagun Gitagun is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 59
Liked 53 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Interesting. Over the last few weeks, I fired several hundred rounds of Magtech .38 and .357 through several weapons with 100% reliability and accuracy. I was so impressed that I switched my carry ammo to Magtech.

Any brand can have temporary problems. I have a box of Federal .357 magnum ammo from a few years ago that I was only able to fire a few rounds out of a box of 20. I got hard strikes and the ammo wouldn't fire in any gun. I fault the primers in that case. There is no return on ammo so I saved the box of ammo just for demo purposes.

Check your gun out thoroughly as others have mentioned. Then again, you may have bought some faulty ammo. There are no guarantees and if you shoot enough, you will find issues with any weapon or ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-10-2016, 05:28 PM
PatriotX's Avatar
PatriotX PatriotX is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 8,112
Liked 9,615 Times in 2,161 Posts
Default

Were you firing a mix of 38s and 357s?

Sometimes, when my revolvers get dirty during extended firing sessions, the crud ring in the cylinder doesn't allow the magnum rounds to seat fully without a bit of push.

If this happens, the hammer sometimes won't set off the primer, as the energy is spent seating the cartridge.


So it could be a combo of gun/ammo issues.
__________________
- Post No Bills -
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-12-2016, 06:13 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,178 Times in 4,571 Posts
Default

Quote:
Were you firing a mix of 38s and 357s?
Not at the same time but I did pop through a few Hornady .357s. I'll be double checking this. I'll check all the screws and everything before I shoot it agin.

Quote:
did the failures happen in single action, double action, or both? Has there been any trigger work done?
Double action. 100% stock gun and it will stay that way; it doesn't need a thing as far as I'm concerned.

I have a 2.5" 686+ with trigger work - it's VERY slick but it's not really necessary. If I hadn't let the first gunsmith tinker with it (whilst he was making a holster for it - he was a leather crafter first and foremost) I wouldn't have needed the second gunsmith to make it right. The second time it became something of a rocket gun, the action is so smooth and slick.

But I like the original actions just fine as a rule.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-12-2016, 06:38 PM
Kanewpadle's Avatar
Kanewpadle Kanewpadle is offline
US Veteran
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,188
Likes: 13,015
Liked 17,127 Times in 5,143 Posts
Default

As I stated in another thread, Mag Tech has had problems with hard/bad primers. The local indoor range has a box full of Mag Tech in several calibers that have hard/bad primers.
__________________
Life Is A Gift. Defend it!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-12-2016, 06:49 PM
Otreb Otreb is offline
Member
Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+ Was it the ammo or was it the gun - Mag-Tech versus 686+  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WA St
Posts: 684
Likes: 285
Liked 912 Times in 366 Posts
Default

Another vote for 'check strain screw'.
I shoot a lot of MT ammo, never a problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mag-Tech .38 special ammo T-BERRY B. Ammo 3 11-22-2012 06:16 PM
140 grain Barnes .357 versus my present ccw ammo. pps Ammo 6 02-04-2012 10:24 AM
SOLD: m&p blade tech paddle holster/blade tech dual mag holder blkpitbull Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 2 08-09-2011 10:34 PM
Dynamic Research Tech. Ammo?? jal910s Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 03-02-2010 11:20 AM
Mag-Tech ammo in .32 handejector. 681ismyfavorite Ammo 4 09-28-2009 02:18 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)